‘Virtually’ the same learning outcomes. A case study of a virtual client briefed communication project across borders

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Alexandre Duarte, Kirstie Riedl
{"title":"‘Virtually’ the same learning outcomes. A case study of a virtual client briefed communication project across borders","authors":"Alexandre Duarte, Kirstie Riedl","doi":"10.7195/ri14.v19i2.1724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the world becomes increasingly more turbulent, complex and competitive, there has been an increased interest in creativity as the major force to prepare students for these demands. At the same time, digital native students today are used to working in an environment rich with instantly accessible information and knowledge, yet paradoxically students are less satisfied with their courses in the online environment.  Educators are thus challenged to use innovative methods to nurture creativity online as they would do in the face-to-face classroom. \nIn 2010, six European universities created an international project, named Cross Border Brand Communication (CBBC) that has taken place every year since but in 2020 took place online due to the Covid-19 pandemic.  This article describes and analyzes the best practices resulting from this case and addresses the research questions as to whether the creative learning outcomes and teaching practices online are the same as face-to-face and to what extent are students satisfied with this learning environment.  Reflection on the project and case indicates that although learning outcomes online are “virtually” the same, the student experience is inferior to such face-to-face projects. \n ","PeriodicalId":43741,"journal":{"name":"Revista Icono 14-Revista Cientifica de Comunicacion y Tecnologias","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Icono 14-Revista Cientifica de Comunicacion y Tecnologias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v19i2.1724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the world becomes increasingly more turbulent, complex and competitive, there has been an increased interest in creativity as the major force to prepare students for these demands. At the same time, digital native students today are used to working in an environment rich with instantly accessible information and knowledge, yet paradoxically students are less satisfied with their courses in the online environment.  Educators are thus challenged to use innovative methods to nurture creativity online as they would do in the face-to-face classroom. In 2010, six European universities created an international project, named Cross Border Brand Communication (CBBC) that has taken place every year since but in 2020 took place online due to the Covid-19 pandemic.  This article describes and analyzes the best practices resulting from this case and addresses the research questions as to whether the creative learning outcomes and teaching practices online are the same as face-to-face and to what extent are students satisfied with this learning environment.  Reflection on the project and case indicates that although learning outcomes online are “virtually” the same, the student experience is inferior to such face-to-face projects.  
“实际上”是相同的学习结果。一个虚拟客户端跨边界通信项目的案例研究
随着世界变得越来越动荡、复杂和竞争激烈,人们对创造力的兴趣日益浓厚,认为它是帮助学生应对这些需求的主要力量。与此同时,今天的数字原生学生已经习惯了在一个充满即时信息和知识的环境中工作,然而矛盾的是,学生们对在线环境中的课程不太满意。因此,教育工作者面临的挑战是使用创新的方法来培养在线创造力,就像他们在面对面的课堂上做的那样。2010年,六所欧洲大学创建了一个名为“跨境品牌传播”(CBBC)的国际项目,自那以后每年都进行,但由于新冠肺炎大流行,2020年开始在网上进行。本文描述并分析了该案例产生的最佳实践,并解决了关于创造性学习成果和在线教学实践是否与面对面教学相同以及学生对这种学习环境的满意程度的研究问题。对项目和案例的反思表明,尽管在线学习成果“几乎”相同,但学生的体验不如面对面的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信