De-storying Community Narratives: Unimagined Community in Queer Educators’ Small Stories

James Joshua Coleman (Josh)
{"title":"De-storying Community Narratives: Unimagined Community in Queer Educators’ Small Stories","authors":"James Joshua Coleman (Josh)","doi":"10.1177/01614681231161126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Context: Within critical research broadly, scholars increasingly turn to stories and storytelling to pursue equity in educational contexts. Such scholarship does, however, primarily focus on the composition or creation of stories. Expanding the scope of storytelling research, this article turns to queer and trans knowledges to highlight a parallel set of storytelling practices—de-composing practices—and demonstrates their impact on historically marginalized community narratives and the pursuit of equity and justice in the field of education. Purpose/Objective/Research Question or Focus of Study: As critical calls for storying, counter-storytelling, and restorying increase within critical research in education, this article theorizes a parallel literacy practice, de-storying, as part of a set of de-composing practices. Defined as the habitual and often subconscious unimagining of community narratives in alignment with dominant narratives, de-storying shows how certain stories of marginalized communities come to be consistently unimagined. This article focuses particularly on queer community narratives and de-storying’s impact in the form of unimagined ancestors, elders, guardians, and peers. Research Design: A narrative inquiry project, this research study shares data from an inquiry community of nine queer educators. Gathering together 13 times over the course of an academic year, these educators engaged in a structured restorying process and through speculative storytelling reimagined and rewrote narrativized experiences of queerphobia. In particular, small stories demonstrated how de-storying affected these educators’ storytelling practices and, furthermore, revealed that three dominant community narratives (i.e., heteronormativity, queer fatalism, and homonormativity) compressed the potential small stories these educators told. Conclusions/Recommendations: Findings from this project illustrate how de-storying practices resulted in four unimagined community narratives across participants: missing queer ancestors, elders, guardians, and peers. De-storying occurred across various intersections of participants’ identities. Findings from this study advance critical approaches to storytelling by revealing de-storying as one of many potential de-composing practices. This article concludes by inviting the theorization of additional de-composing practices in order to center the most marginalized stories within education—namely, those that are actively unimagined.","PeriodicalId":22248,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231161126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Context: Within critical research broadly, scholars increasingly turn to stories and storytelling to pursue equity in educational contexts. Such scholarship does, however, primarily focus on the composition or creation of stories. Expanding the scope of storytelling research, this article turns to queer and trans knowledges to highlight a parallel set of storytelling practices—de-composing practices—and demonstrates their impact on historically marginalized community narratives and the pursuit of equity and justice in the field of education. Purpose/Objective/Research Question or Focus of Study: As critical calls for storying, counter-storytelling, and restorying increase within critical research in education, this article theorizes a parallel literacy practice, de-storying, as part of a set of de-composing practices. Defined as the habitual and often subconscious unimagining of community narratives in alignment with dominant narratives, de-storying shows how certain stories of marginalized communities come to be consistently unimagined. This article focuses particularly on queer community narratives and de-storying’s impact in the form of unimagined ancestors, elders, guardians, and peers. Research Design: A narrative inquiry project, this research study shares data from an inquiry community of nine queer educators. Gathering together 13 times over the course of an academic year, these educators engaged in a structured restorying process and through speculative storytelling reimagined and rewrote narrativized experiences of queerphobia. In particular, small stories demonstrated how de-storying affected these educators’ storytelling practices and, furthermore, revealed that three dominant community narratives (i.e., heteronormativity, queer fatalism, and homonormativity) compressed the potential small stories these educators told. Conclusions/Recommendations: Findings from this project illustrate how de-storying practices resulted in four unimagined community narratives across participants: missing queer ancestors, elders, guardians, and peers. De-storying occurred across various intersections of participants’ identities. Findings from this study advance critical approaches to storytelling by revealing de-storying as one of many potential de-composing practices. This article concludes by inviting the theorization of additional de-composing practices in order to center the most marginalized stories within education—namely, those that are actively unimagined.
去故事化的社区叙事:酷儿教育者小故事中的不可想象的社区
背景/背景:在广泛的批判性研究中,学者们越来越多地转向故事和讲故事来追求教育背景中的公平。然而,这类学术确实主要关注故事的构成或创作。本文扩展了叙事研究的范围,转向酷儿和跨性别知识,强调了一套平行的叙事实践——解构实践——并展示了它们对历史上被边缘化的社区叙事和追求教育领域的公平和正义的影响。目的/目标/研究问题或研究焦点:随着批判性教育研究中对故事、反故事和恢复的需求的增加,本文将平行的识字实践——反故事——理论化,作为一系列解构实践的一部分。去故事化被定义为习惯性的、经常是潜意识的、与主流叙事相一致的群体叙事,它显示了边缘化群体的某些故事是如何始终无法想象的。这篇文章特别关注酷儿群体的叙事和以不可想象的祖先、长辈、监护人和同龄人的形式去故事化的影响。研究设计:这是一个叙述性的探究项目,这项研究分享了来自九位酷儿教育者的探究社区的数据。在一学年的课程中,这些教育工作者聚集在一起13次,参与了一个有组织的修复过程,通过推测性的故事叙述,重新想象和重写了同性恋恐惧症的叙述经历。特别是,小故事展示了去故事化如何影响这些教育者的讲故事实践,并且进一步揭示了三种主要的社区叙事(即异性恋、酷儿宿命论和同性宿命论)压缩了这些教育者讲述的潜在小故事。结论/建议:本项目的研究结果说明了去故事化实践如何在参与者中产生四种无法想象的社区叙事:失踪的酷儿祖先、长辈、监护人和同龄人。去故事化发生在参与者身份的不同交叉点上。这项研究的发现通过揭示作为许多潜在的分解实践之一的去故事化,推进了讲故事的批判性方法。这篇文章的最后邀请了额外的分解实践的理论化,以便在教育中集中最边缘化的故事-即那些主动无法想象的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信