Optimization in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA): A Systematic Literature Review

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Crippa, C. Ugaya
{"title":"Optimization in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA): A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"J. Crippa, C. Ugaya","doi":"10.5539/jms.v13n2p68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This secondary scientific research follows the modality of review research through the systematic literature review (SLR) technique and aims to answer the following question: What methods in the literature use optimization techniques to develop Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)? The objective is to identify and map information, relate their applications, and provide a critical analysis. The research was conducted in a global context, on April 2, 2022, with no time horizon limit, in English, using Harzing's Publish or Perish tool and search sources: Scopus®, Web of Science™, and Google Scholar. After the automatic exclusion of duplicate titles, the selection of articles was carried out in five further steps: first filtering, second filtering, third filtering, fourth filtering, and finally the snowball system. Regarding the years of selected publications, a slow but continuous upward trend (growth) can be seen. A diversity of journals can be observed and that most methods integrating optimization and LCSA focus on each product/system or application. Each optimization model proposal has its specific characteristics when combined with LCSA. Overall, there is a greater frequency of articles that propose to evaluate by comparing alternative products/supply chains/production processes, followed by those that use optimization for product development in selecting the best design from a set of alternatives. This research confirms that Operational Research (OR) operates in different segments and can use different techniques to obtain optimal solutions and decision support. The optimization techniques found in this or other literature reviews should be evaluated against an established analytical model by applying them to the same case study.","PeriodicalId":36330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v13n2p68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This secondary scientific research follows the modality of review research through the systematic literature review (SLR) technique and aims to answer the following question: What methods in the literature use optimization techniques to develop Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)? The objective is to identify and map information, relate their applications, and provide a critical analysis. The research was conducted in a global context, on April 2, 2022, with no time horizon limit, in English, using Harzing's Publish or Perish tool and search sources: Scopus®, Web of Science™, and Google Scholar. After the automatic exclusion of duplicate titles, the selection of articles was carried out in five further steps: first filtering, second filtering, third filtering, fourth filtering, and finally the snowball system. Regarding the years of selected publications, a slow but continuous upward trend (growth) can be seen. A diversity of journals can be observed and that most methods integrating optimization and LCSA focus on each product/system or application. Each optimization model proposal has its specific characteristics when combined with LCSA. Overall, there is a greater frequency of articles that propose to evaluate by comparing alternative products/supply chains/production processes, followed by those that use optimization for product development in selecting the best design from a set of alternatives. This research confirms that Operational Research (OR) operates in different segments and can use different techniques to obtain optimal solutions and decision support. The optimization techniques found in this or other literature reviews should be evaluated against an established analytical model by applying them to the same case study.
生命周期可持续性评价(LCSA)中的优化:系统文献综述
本次二次科学研究遵循综述研究的模式,通过系统文献综述(SLR)技术,旨在回答以下问题:文献中哪些方法使用优化技术来开发生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)?目标是识别和映射信息,关联它们的应用程序,并提供关键的分析。该研究于2022年4月2日在全球范围内进行,没有时间限制,以英文进行,使用Harzing的“发表或灭亡”工具,搜索来源:Scopus®,Web of Science™和Google Scholar。在自动排除重复标题后,文章的选择进一步进行五步:第一过滤,第二过滤,第三过滤,第四过滤,最后是滚雪球系统。从所选出版物的年份来看,可以看到缓慢但持续的上升趋势。可以观察到各种各样的期刊,并且大多数集成优化和LCSA的方法都专注于每个产品/系统或应用。每种优化模型方案在与LCSA结合时都有其特定的特点。总的来说,有更多的文章建议通过比较替代产品/供应链/生产过程来进行评估,其次是那些使用优化来从一组替代方案中选择最佳设计的产品开发。本研究证实了运筹学(OR)在不同的领域中运作,可以使用不同的技术来获得最优的解决方案和决策支持。在本文或其他文献综述中发现的优化技术应该通过将它们应用于相同的案例研究来对已建立的分析模型进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Management and Sustainability
International Journal of Management and Sustainability Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信