Supervised Credit, Government Strategies and Green Development: Evidence from China

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bingbing Zhang
{"title":"Supervised Credit, Government Strategies and Green Development: Evidence from China","authors":"Bingbing Zhang","doi":"10.35784/preko.4035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between supervised credit (SC), government strategies, and green development (GD) utilizing the instrumental variable two-stage least squares (IV-2SLS) and spatial econometric model and panel data from 30 provinces and cities in China from 2006 to 2020. The study reached the following main results. First, untrustworthy punishment and trustworthy incentives promote the environmental protection through optimal allocation of supervised resources, which can be positively regulated by the government transformation. Second, beggar-thy-neighbor and free rider can be found in government environmental SC. Strengthening punishment in neighboring regions will have a negative effect on the local GD, whereas increasing incentives will have the opposite effect. Third, strategic interactions among various governmental sections have varying effects on GD. The eastern regions implement difference-based promotion for trustworthy incentives and ineffective imitation for untrustworthy punishment. The central and western regions, on the other hand, use ineffective imitation for trustworthy incentives and inhibiting imitation for untrustworthy punishment, the eastern regions implement ineffective imitation and the central and western regions execute inhibiting imitation. Finally, when R&D investment exceeds a certain threshold, but the industrial structure is lower, the untrustworthy punishment can play its promoting role; otherwise, the trustworthy incentives will turn over. The study findings reveal the unique mechanism of SC and provides new impetus regional policymakers to promote sustainable GD.","PeriodicalId":44696,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.4035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between supervised credit (SC), government strategies, and green development (GD) utilizing the instrumental variable two-stage least squares (IV-2SLS) and spatial econometric model and panel data from 30 provinces and cities in China from 2006 to 2020. The study reached the following main results. First, untrustworthy punishment and trustworthy incentives promote the environmental protection through optimal allocation of supervised resources, which can be positively regulated by the government transformation. Second, beggar-thy-neighbor and free rider can be found in government environmental SC. Strengthening punishment in neighboring regions will have a negative effect on the local GD, whereas increasing incentives will have the opposite effect. Third, strategic interactions among various governmental sections have varying effects on GD. The eastern regions implement difference-based promotion for trustworthy incentives and ineffective imitation for untrustworthy punishment. The central and western regions, on the other hand, use ineffective imitation for trustworthy incentives and inhibiting imitation for untrustworthy punishment, the eastern regions implement ineffective imitation and the central and western regions execute inhibiting imitation. Finally, when R&D investment exceeds a certain threshold, but the industrial structure is lower, the untrustworthy punishment can play its promoting role; otherwise, the trustworthy incentives will turn over. The study findings reveal the unique mechanism of SC and provides new impetus regional policymakers to promote sustainable GD.
监管信贷、政府战略与绿色发展:来自中国的证据
本文利用工具变量两阶段最小二乘法(ii - 2sls)、空间计量模型和2006 - 2020年中国30个省市的面板数据,研究了监管信贷(SC)、政府战略和绿色发展(GD)之间的关系。研究得出了以下主要结果。首先,失信惩罚和失信激励通过监管资源的优化配置促进环境保护,这可以通过政府转型进行正向调节。其次,政府环境SC存在以邻为壑和搭便车现象,周边地区加大惩罚力度会对当地GD产生负面影响,而加大激励力度则会产生相反的效果。第三,政府各部门之间的战略互动对gdp的影响是不同的。东部地区对诚信激励实行差异促进,对失信惩罚实行无效模仿。中西部地区以无效模仿激励守信,抑制模仿惩罚失信,东部地区以无效模仿,中西部地区以抑制模仿。最后,当研发投入超过一定阈值,但产业结构较低时,失信惩罚可以发挥其促进作用;否则,值得信赖的激励机制就会失效。研究结果揭示了可持续发展的独特机制,为区域决策者促进可持续发展提供了新的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Problemy Ekorozwoju ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信