Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Sweet Isovanillyl Derivatives

A. Bassoli, M. Drew, Channa K. Hattotuwagama, L. Merlini, G. Morini, Gareth R. H. Wilden
{"title":"Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Sweet Isovanillyl Derivatives","authors":"A. Bassoli, M. Drew, Channa K. Hattotuwagama, L. Merlini, G. Morini, Gareth R. H. Wilden","doi":"10.1002/1521-3838(200105)20:1<3::AID-QSAR3>3.0.CO;2-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Isovanillyl derivatives constitute a large class of sweet compounds in which there is a high degree of structural similarity and a wide range of biological activity, the relative sweetness RS spanning from 50 to 10 000 times with respect to sucrose. This paper describes the results obtained by applying statistical models to develop QSARs for these derivatives. For a set of 14 compounds (set 1) appropriate physicochemical parameters for regression equations were selected using the genetic algorithm method. The best equation indicates a very close correlation (N=14, ND=5, r2=0.982, Rcv2=0.942, LOF=0.074, PRESS=0.271, SPRESS=0.184, SDEP=0.139). Good results have also been obtained by Molecular Field Analysis (MFA) applied to the same set of compounds (N=14, ND=4, r2=0.957, rcv2=0.925, LOF=0.044, PRESS=0.348, SPRESS=0.196, SDEP=0.158). QSARs have also been derived for a larger set of 41 compounds (set 2, including set 1, plus other 27 compounds) with a much larger variety of structural types. These compounds have been divided into a training set of 35 compounds and a test set of 6 compounds. The most significant QSAR obtained using physicochemical parameters (N=35, ND=6, r2=0.673, rcv2=0.522, LOF 0.337, PRESS=7.432, SPRESS=0.515, SDEP=0.461) proved less successful than one using MFA parameters (N=35, ND=6, r2=0.746, rcv2=0.607, LOF 0.261, PRESS=6.110, SPRESS=0.467, SDEP=0.418). PRESS values for the test set were 4.079 and 1.962 respectively showing that the MFA data had more predictive power. Equations with different numbers of descriptors were compared and it was concluded that the LOF which is dependent upon the number of parameters used as well as the sum of squares is a suitable measure of equation quality. These equations were also validated by scrambling the experimental data which gave significantly worse agreement than the real data except when an excessive number of descriptors was used.","PeriodicalId":20818,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3838(200105)20:1<3::AID-QSAR3>3.0.CO;2-H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Isovanillyl derivatives constitute a large class of sweet compounds in which there is a high degree of structural similarity and a wide range of biological activity, the relative sweetness RS spanning from 50 to 10 000 times with respect to sucrose. This paper describes the results obtained by applying statistical models to develop QSARs for these derivatives. For a set of 14 compounds (set 1) appropriate physicochemical parameters for regression equations were selected using the genetic algorithm method. The best equation indicates a very close correlation (N=14, ND=5, r2=0.982, Rcv2=0.942, LOF=0.074, PRESS=0.271, SPRESS=0.184, SDEP=0.139). Good results have also been obtained by Molecular Field Analysis (MFA) applied to the same set of compounds (N=14, ND=4, r2=0.957, rcv2=0.925, LOF=0.044, PRESS=0.348, SPRESS=0.196, SDEP=0.158). QSARs have also been derived for a larger set of 41 compounds (set 2, including set 1, plus other 27 compounds) with a much larger variety of structural types. These compounds have been divided into a training set of 35 compounds and a test set of 6 compounds. The most significant QSAR obtained using physicochemical parameters (N=35, ND=6, r2=0.673, rcv2=0.522, LOF 0.337, PRESS=7.432, SPRESS=0.515, SDEP=0.461) proved less successful than one using MFA parameters (N=35, ND=6, r2=0.746, rcv2=0.607, LOF 0.261, PRESS=6.110, SPRESS=0.467, SDEP=0.418). PRESS values for the test set were 4.079 and 1.962 respectively showing that the MFA data had more predictive power. Equations with different numbers of descriptors were compared and it was concluded that the LOF which is dependent upon the number of parameters used as well as the sum of squares is a suitable measure of equation quality. These equations were also validated by scrambling the experimental data which gave significantly worse agreement than the real data except when an excessive number of descriptors was used.
甜异香草基衍生物的定量构效关系
异香草基衍生物是一类具有高度结构相似性和广泛生物活性的甜化合物,其相对甜度RS为蔗糖的50 ~ 10000倍。本文描述了应用统计模型为这些衍生品开发qsar的结果。对于14个化合物(集合1),采用遗传算法选择合适的理化参数建立回归方程。最佳方程显示相关性非常密切(N=14, ND=5, r2=0.982, Rcv2=0.942, LOF=0.074, PRESS=0.271, PRESS=0.184, SDEP=0.139)。对同一组化合物进行分子场分析(MFA)也获得了较好的结果(N=14, ND=4, r2=0.957, rcv2=0.925, LOF=0.044, PRESS=0.348, PRESS=0.196, SDEP=0.158)。qsar还被用于更大的41个化合物(集合2,包括集合1,加上其他27个化合物),具有更大的结构类型。这些化合物被分为35个化合物的训练集和6个化合物的测试集。使用理化参数(N=35, ND=6, r2=0.673, rcv2=0.522, LOF 0.337, PRESS=7.432, PRESS=0.515, SDEP=0.461)获得的最显著QSAR比使用MFA参数(N=35, ND=6, r2=0.746, rcv2=0.607, LOF 0.261, PRESS=6.110, PRESS=0.467, SDEP=0.418)获得的效果要差。检验集的PRESS值分别为4.079和1.962,说明MFA数据具有更强的预测能力。通过对具有不同数量描述符的方程进行比较,得出了LOF与参数数量和平方和的关系是衡量方程质量的合适指标。这些方程也通过打乱实验数据来验证,除了使用过多的描述符时,实验数据的一致性明显差于实际数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信