Novelty and Utility: How the Arts May Advance Question Creation in Contemporary Research

Johannes Lehmann, Rachel Garber Cole, Nathaniel E. Stern
{"title":"Novelty and Utility: How the Arts May Advance Question Creation in Contemporary Research","authors":"Johannes Lehmann, Rachel Garber Cole, Nathaniel E. Stern","doi":"10.1162/leon_a_02400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper builds on research around novelty and utility to argue that the value of arts thinking should be applied in the generation of scientific questions. Arts thinking is often playful, less goal oriented, and can lead to new modes of questioning. Scientific thinking often solves an existing question, serves a purpose in solving the question, and must be predictable. The “problem of the problem” is that asking creative questions is the linchpin of the quality of research across the sciences, just as the best of art “does things” that make us move and feel moved; yet we posit that it is useful to consider that what each teaches and celebrates typically tends more toward either utility or novelty as an entry point. A new theoretical basis is presented in identifying questions primarily based on novelty rather than utility, and a catalogue of methods proposed for creating questions to employ in education, practice, and project planning.","PeriodicalId":93330,"journal":{"name":"Leonardo (Oxford, England)","volume":"11 1","pages":"488-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leonardo (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper builds on research around novelty and utility to argue that the value of arts thinking should be applied in the generation of scientific questions. Arts thinking is often playful, less goal oriented, and can lead to new modes of questioning. Scientific thinking often solves an existing question, serves a purpose in solving the question, and must be predictable. The “problem of the problem” is that asking creative questions is the linchpin of the quality of research across the sciences, just as the best of art “does things” that make us move and feel moved; yet we posit that it is useful to consider that what each teaches and celebrates typically tends more toward either utility or novelty as an entry point. A new theoretical basis is presented in identifying questions primarily based on novelty rather than utility, and a catalogue of methods proposed for creating questions to employ in education, practice, and project planning.
新颖性与实用性:艺术如何推动当代研究中的问题创造
摘要本文以新颖性和实用性研究为基础,论证了艺术思维的价值应该应用于科学问题的生成。艺术思维通常是有趣的,不太以目标为导向,可以导致新的质疑模式。科学思维常常解决一个存在的问题,为解决问题服务,而且必须是可预测的。“问题的问题”是,提出创造性的问题是整个科学研究质量的关键,就像最好的艺术“做事情”让我们感动和感到感动一样;然而,我们认为,考虑到每个人的教导和庆祝通常更倾向于实用性或新颖性作为切入点,这是有用的。本文提出了一个新的理论基础,即主要基于新颖性而非实用性来识别问题,并提出了一系列用于教育、实践和项目规划的问题创建方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信