Islamic Law at the Grassroot; SIGMA Program at Bhasa Radio Situbondo and Its Controversy

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Muntaha Artalim, Zaim, Ahmad Azaim Ibrahimy, A. Hamid, Achak Muassasah, Dar Al-Hadith, Marocco Al-Hasaniyyah Morocco
{"title":"Islamic Law at the Grassroot; SIGMA Program at Bhasa Radio Situbondo and Its Controversy","authors":"Muntaha Artalim, Zaim, Ahmad Azaim Ibrahimy, A. Hamid, Achak Muassasah, Dar Al-Hadith, Marocco Al-Hasaniyyah Morocco","doi":"10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.8332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the controversy of SIGMA (Konsultasi Agama or Religious Consultation) at Bhasa Radio 93.1 FM Situbondo as the representation of how grassroots Muslims perceive Islamic law. SIGMA is an aired interactive forum discussing current issues of Islamic law engaging a host, a speaker, and listeners. However, it sparks controversy particularly because of the stigma of a liberalist. This research, therefore, focuses on the typology of SIGMA perspective through the opinion of its speakers, genealogy beyond their thought, and the controversy that comes along. As a qualitative field study with a socio-philosophical approach, it used interviews with 14 informants consisting of SIGMA speakers and staff as well as listeners from diverse backgrounds. It turns out that; firstly, SIGMA’s perspective indicates a progressive type of thought rather than liberal as stigmatized because of the employment of maqas{id al-syari’ah during discussing the issue and making decisions afterward. Secondly, the thinking model can be traced back historically to NU (Nahdlatul Ulama’) reformists who likely use maqas{id al-syari'ah to examine Islamic law along with a progressive mindset. SIGMA speakers furthermore tend to employ advancement of ijtihad and contextual fiqh like what bahs| al-masa'il forums typically do. Thirdly, the controversy stems mainly from the negative stigma which tends to be loudly and sporadically expressed making sympathetic voices unheard. This implies how grassroots Muslims interact with Islamic law in both textual and contextual realms particularly when coping with the changing situation and dynamic methodologies.","PeriodicalId":31072,"journal":{"name":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.8332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the controversy of SIGMA (Konsultasi Agama or Religious Consultation) at Bhasa Radio 93.1 FM Situbondo as the representation of how grassroots Muslims perceive Islamic law. SIGMA is an aired interactive forum discussing current issues of Islamic law engaging a host, a speaker, and listeners. However, it sparks controversy particularly because of the stigma of a liberalist. This research, therefore, focuses on the typology of SIGMA perspective through the opinion of its speakers, genealogy beyond their thought, and the controversy that comes along. As a qualitative field study with a socio-philosophical approach, it used interviews with 14 informants consisting of SIGMA speakers and staff as well as listeners from diverse backgrounds. It turns out that; firstly, SIGMA’s perspective indicates a progressive type of thought rather than liberal as stigmatized because of the employment of maqas{id al-syari’ah during discussing the issue and making decisions afterward. Secondly, the thinking model can be traced back historically to NU (Nahdlatul Ulama’) reformists who likely use maqas{id al-syari'ah to examine Islamic law along with a progressive mindset. SIGMA speakers furthermore tend to employ advancement of ijtihad and contextual fiqh like what bahs| al-masa'il forums typically do. Thirdly, the controversy stems mainly from the negative stigma which tends to be loudly and sporadically expressed making sympathetic voices unheard. This implies how grassroots Muslims interact with Islamic law in both textual and contextual realms particularly when coping with the changing situation and dynamic methodologies.
伊斯兰教法在基层的应用;拉萨广播电台西格玛节目及其争议
本研究探讨了Bhasa Radio 93.1 FM sitbondo的SIGMA (Konsultasi Agama或宗教咨询)作为基层穆斯林如何看待伊斯兰法律的代表的争议。SIGMA是一个播出的互动论坛,讨论当前的伊斯兰法律问题,有主持人、演讲者和听众。然而,它引发了争议,特别是因为自由主义者的耻辱。因此,本研究的重点是通过说话人的观点来研究SIGMA视角的类型学,超越他们思想的谱系,以及随之而来的争议。作为一项具有社会哲学方法的定性实地研究,它使用了对14名告密者的采访,包括SIGMA演讲者和工作人员以及来自不同背景的听众。事实证明;首先,SIGMA的观点表明了一种进步的思想类型,而不是自由主义,因为在讨论问题和之后做出决定时使用maqas{id al-syari 'ah而被污名化。其次,这种思维模式可以追溯到历史上的NU (Nahdlatul Ulama ')改革派,他们可能使用maqas{id al-syari'ah来检查伊斯兰法律以及进步的心态。此外,SIGMA演讲者倾向于采用伊吉提哈德和上下文法的进步,就像bahs al-masa'il论坛通常做的那样。第三,争议主要源于负面的污名,这种污名往往大声而零星地表达,使同情的声音闻所未闻。这意味着基层穆斯林如何在文本和上下文领域与伊斯兰法律互动,特别是在应对不断变化的情况和动态方法时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum  Pranata Sosial
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信