Faculty perspective on competency-based research education: A multi-centre study from Saudi Arabia

Hamzah A. Naji, Jumana Sarraj, I. Muhsen, S. Kherallah, Ahmed S. Qannita, Akef S. Obeidat, M. Sajid
{"title":"Faculty perspective on competency-based research education: A multi-centre study from Saudi Arabia","authors":"Hamzah A. Naji, Jumana Sarraj, I. Muhsen, S. Kherallah, Ahmed S. Qannita, Akef S. Obeidat, M. Sajid","doi":"10.4103/JHS.JHS_145_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Research is becoming indispensable in today's medical education and clinical practice. Engaging medical students in research activities and producing clinically competent and research-oriented medical students are essential demands of today's modern medicine. Incorporating research-based competencies and designing research-oriented medical curricula are challenging and need more attention, especially in developing countries. The aim of this study was to identify research competencies for medical students and the best instructional modality for their integration in the medical curricula. Methodology: A list of research competencies needed to be acquired by medical students during their undergraduate level have been proposed and classified under the following categories: general research skills, biostatistics, basic biomedical research and clinical research and epidemiology. The competencies were further reviewed by academicians of different fields. Afterwards, a questionnaire was prepared targeting researchers who have mentored undergraduate medical students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Research mentors were asked to rate the importance of the competencies listed using a 5-point Likert scale and to determine how they should be delivered into the medical curricula. Results: Results showed that Likert scale mean score ranged from 3.44 to 4.71, illustrating mentors' agreement to the importance of the competencies listed. Around 52% and 58% of mentors choose 'compulsory component' in case of 'general research skills' and 'biostatistics', respectively. On the other hand, 75% and 66% of mentors choose 'non-compulsory component' in case of 'basic research' and 'clinical research and epidemiology', respectively. Conclusion: Standardisation of competencies might help to better integrate research competencies in medical curricula.","PeriodicalId":31033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Specialties","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JHS.JHS_145_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Research is becoming indispensable in today's medical education and clinical practice. Engaging medical students in research activities and producing clinically competent and research-oriented medical students are essential demands of today's modern medicine. Incorporating research-based competencies and designing research-oriented medical curricula are challenging and need more attention, especially in developing countries. The aim of this study was to identify research competencies for medical students and the best instructional modality for their integration in the medical curricula. Methodology: A list of research competencies needed to be acquired by medical students during their undergraduate level have been proposed and classified under the following categories: general research skills, biostatistics, basic biomedical research and clinical research and epidemiology. The competencies were further reviewed by academicians of different fields. Afterwards, a questionnaire was prepared targeting researchers who have mentored undergraduate medical students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Research mentors were asked to rate the importance of the competencies listed using a 5-point Likert scale and to determine how they should be delivered into the medical curricula. Results: Results showed that Likert scale mean score ranged from 3.44 to 4.71, illustrating mentors' agreement to the importance of the competencies listed. Around 52% and 58% of mentors choose 'compulsory component' in case of 'general research skills' and 'biostatistics', respectively. On the other hand, 75% and 66% of mentors choose 'non-compulsory component' in case of 'basic research' and 'clinical research and epidemiology', respectively. Conclusion: Standardisation of competencies might help to better integrate research competencies in medical curricula.
能力研究型教育的教师视角:来自沙特阿拉伯的多中心研究
导读:在当今的医学教育和临床实践中,研究变得不可或缺。让医学生参与研究活动,培养具有临床能力和研究型的医学生是当今现代医学的基本要求。纳入以研究为基础的能力和设计以研究为导向的医学课程具有挑战性,需要更多的关注,特别是在发展中国家。本研究的目的是确定医学生的研究能力,以及将其融入医学课程的最佳教学模式。方法:提出了医科学生在本科阶段需要获得的研究能力清单,并将其分为以下几类:一般研究技能、生物统计学、基础生物医学研究和临床研究以及流行病学。不同领域的学者进一步审查了这些能力。随后,针对在沙特阿拉伯利雅得指导医科本科生的研究人员准备了一份调查问卷。研究导师被要求使用5分李克特量表对所列能力的重要性进行评级,并决定如何将其纳入医学课程。结果:李克特量表平均得分在3.44 ~ 4.71之间,说明导师对所列胜任力的重要性表示认同。大约52%和58%的导师分别在“一般研究技能”和“生物统计学”的情况下选择了“必修部分”。另一方面,75%和66%的导师分别在“基础研究”和“临床研究和流行病学”的情况下选择“非强制性内容”。结论:能力标准化有助于更好地整合医学课程中的研究能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信