Quality Assessment of Sweetmeat (Rosogolla) Of Dhaka and Tangail Region of Bangladesh

U. Prodhan, Md. jahangir Alam, A. Sultana, Md Harun Rashid, T. Das, N. Akter, M. M. Rahman
{"title":"Quality Assessment of Sweetmeat (Rosogolla) Of Dhaka and Tangail Region of Bangladesh","authors":"U. Prodhan, Md. jahangir Alam, A. Sultana, Md Harun Rashid, T. Das, N. Akter, M. M. Rahman","doi":"10.9790/2402-1107010611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental study was design to assess the nutritional quality of the Rosogolla available in Dhaka and Tangail region of Bangladesh. Sweetmeats were collected from a branded shop in Mirpur road and non-branded Rosogolla in Dhaka city area and a branded shop in pachani bazar and non-branded Rosogolla available at old bus-stand of Tangail district area. Quality of the Rosogolla was evaluated by chemical, microbial and hazard analysis. It was found that quality differed according to the manufacturers of Rosogolla. The chemical analysis score implies that moisture, fat, protein, total sugar and ash content varied significantly (p<0.05) among four different types of Rosogolla. The mineral content i.e. Na, K, Mn, Fe, Zn and Ca in all samples were statistically significant (p<0.05). The toxic heavy metals such as As, Cr, Hg and Pb were not detected in all sample. It was found that the standard plate count in all sample were higher than the maximum permissible level of Bangladesh Standard and Testing Institute (BSTI) standard except R2 sample. Total coliform and total fungal count in all samples also found in unsatisfactory level. About 50% sample contained Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus which may be a hazard to consumer as they are pathogenic bacteria.","PeriodicalId":14546,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"06-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1107010611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

An experimental study was design to assess the nutritional quality of the Rosogolla available in Dhaka and Tangail region of Bangladesh. Sweetmeats were collected from a branded shop in Mirpur road and non-branded Rosogolla in Dhaka city area and a branded shop in pachani bazar and non-branded Rosogolla available at old bus-stand of Tangail district area. Quality of the Rosogolla was evaluated by chemical, microbial and hazard analysis. It was found that quality differed according to the manufacturers of Rosogolla. The chemical analysis score implies that moisture, fat, protein, total sugar and ash content varied significantly (p<0.05) among four different types of Rosogolla. The mineral content i.e. Na, K, Mn, Fe, Zn and Ca in all samples were statistically significant (p<0.05). The toxic heavy metals such as As, Cr, Hg and Pb were not detected in all sample. It was found that the standard plate count in all sample were higher than the maximum permissible level of Bangladesh Standard and Testing Institute (BSTI) standard except R2 sample. Total coliform and total fungal count in all samples also found in unsatisfactory level. About 50% sample contained Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus which may be a hazard to consumer as they are pathogenic bacteria.
孟加拉国达卡和坦盖尔地区甜肉(Rosogolla)质量评价
设计了一项实验研究,以评估孟加拉国达卡和坦盖尔地区可用的Rosogolla的营养质量。糖果是从达卡市区Mirpur路的一家品牌商店和非品牌Rosogolla以及Tangail区旧公交站的pachani bazaar的一家品牌商店和非品牌Rosogolla中收集的。采用化学分析、微生物学分析和危害分析等方法对其质量进行评价。研究发现,不同厂家的Rosogolla的质量不同。水分、脂肪、蛋白质、总糖和灰分含量在4种不同品种间差异显著(p<0.05)。各样品中Na、K、Mn、Fe、Zn、Ca的矿物质含量均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。所有样品均未检出砷、铬、汞、铅等有毒重金属。结果发现,除R2样品外,所有样品中标准板计数均高于孟加拉国标准与检测协会(BSTI)标准的最大允许水平。所有样品的总大肠菌群和总真菌数量也未达到不合格水平。大约50%的样本含有沙门氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,它们是致病菌,可能对消费者造成危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信