Impacts of Conservation Incentives in Protected Areas: The Case of Bolsa Floresta, Brazil

E. Cisneros, J. Börner, S. Pagiola, S. Wunder
{"title":"Impacts of Conservation Incentives in Protected Areas: The Case of Bolsa Floresta, Brazil","authors":"E. Cisneros, J. Börner, S. Pagiola, S. Wunder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incentive-based conservation is a promising approach to tropical forest conservation, including within multiple-use protected areas. In this paper, we analyze the environmental impacts of Bolsa Floresta, a longstanding forest conservation program combining conditional household–level payments with livelihood-focused investments in 15 multiple-use forest reserve areas in the Brazilian state of Amazonas. We use grid-based data, nearest-neighbor matching, and panel data econometrics to compare three forest-related program outcomes – deforestation, degradation, and fires – of participating and non-participating reserve areas. Both pre and post-treatment deforestation and degradation pressures were low, including because low–pressure sites had been preferentially targeted. Thus, we find significant but small additional conservation effects from the implementation of the program. Notwithstanding, treatment effects excel in areas with higher deforestation pressure and higher potential agricultural income. Our findings add to the growing body of evidence showing that adverse spatial targeting by administrative choice, i.e. dis- proportionally selecting low–pressure sites into programs, is a prime cause for the low additionality found in rigorous impact evaluations of incentive-based forest conservation initiatives.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Incentive-based conservation is a promising approach to tropical forest conservation, including within multiple-use protected areas. In this paper, we analyze the environmental impacts of Bolsa Floresta, a longstanding forest conservation program combining conditional household–level payments with livelihood-focused investments in 15 multiple-use forest reserve areas in the Brazilian state of Amazonas. We use grid-based data, nearest-neighbor matching, and panel data econometrics to compare three forest-related program outcomes – deforestation, degradation, and fires – of participating and non-participating reserve areas. Both pre and post-treatment deforestation and degradation pressures were low, including because low–pressure sites had been preferentially targeted. Thus, we find significant but small additional conservation effects from the implementation of the program. Notwithstanding, treatment effects excel in areas with higher deforestation pressure and higher potential agricultural income. Our findings add to the growing body of evidence showing that adverse spatial targeting by administrative choice, i.e. dis- proportionally selecting low–pressure sites into programs, is a prime cause for the low additionality found in rigorous impact evaluations of incentive-based forest conservation initiatives.
保护区保护激励措施的影响:以巴西Bolsa Floresta为例
基于奖励的保护是一种很有希望的热带森林保护方法,包括在多用途保护区内。在本文中,我们分析了Bolsa Floresta的环境影响。Bolsa Floresta是一个长期的森林保护项目,将有条件的家庭补贴与以生计为重点的投资结合起来,在巴西亚马逊州的15个多用途森林保护区开展。我们使用基于网格的数据、最近邻匹配和面板数据计量学来比较参与和未参与保护区的三种与森林相关的项目结果——毁林、退化和火灾。处理前和处理后的毁林和退化压力都很低,包括因为优先针对低压地点。因此,我们发现该计划的实施产生了显著但很小的额外保护效果。然而,在森林砍伐压力大、农业收入潜力高的地区,治理效果较好。我们的发现增加了越来越多的证据,表明行政选择的不利空间目标,即不成比例地选择低压地点进入计划,是在基于激励的森林保护倡议的严格影响评估中发现的低附加性的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信