Evidence From the Scientific Assessment of Electronic Cigarettes and Their Role in Tobacco Harm Reduction

O. Camacho, J. Ebajemito, S. Coburn, K. Prasad, S. Costigan, James J. Murphy
{"title":"Evidence From the Scientific Assessment of Electronic Cigarettes and Their Role in Tobacco Harm Reduction","authors":"O. Camacho, J. Ebajemito, S. Coburn, K. Prasad, S. Costigan, James J. Murphy","doi":"10.2478/cttr-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary While smoking remains a main global cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, a potential inflection point has arrived where it could become possible for non-combustible nicotine products to displace cigarettes and reduce risk for smokers who transition completely from smoking. These have proven consumer satisfaction and are now widely and increasingly available globally. One of the most prominent of these nicotine products are electronic cigarettes (ECs), which are used daily by millions of current and former smokers. The category is not without controversy as these products are not risk free and can cause nicotine dependence. The differing interpretation of science assessing ECs has transpired into inconsistent regulation and product standards, providing an environment for its fragmented manufacturing base which allows for variable product quality and in turn, product quality variability has impacted on how they are viewed. In this review, we assess published scientific evidence to evaluate whether, on balance, ECs fulfil a tobacco harm reduction role by reducing health risks relative to smoking and providing a viable alternative for smokers while having limited appeal to non-smokers.","PeriodicalId":10723,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"63 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Summary While smoking remains a main global cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, a potential inflection point has arrived where it could become possible for non-combustible nicotine products to displace cigarettes and reduce risk for smokers who transition completely from smoking. These have proven consumer satisfaction and are now widely and increasingly available globally. One of the most prominent of these nicotine products are electronic cigarettes (ECs), which are used daily by millions of current and former smokers. The category is not without controversy as these products are not risk free and can cause nicotine dependence. The differing interpretation of science assessing ECs has transpired into inconsistent regulation and product standards, providing an environment for its fragmented manufacturing base which allows for variable product quality and in turn, product quality variability has impacted on how they are viewed. In this review, we assess published scientific evidence to evaluate whether, on balance, ECs fulfil a tobacco harm reduction role by reducing health risks relative to smoking and providing a viable alternative for smokers while having limited appeal to non-smokers.
电子烟科学评估的证据及其在减少烟草危害中的作用
虽然吸烟仍然是全球可预防的发病和死亡的主要原因,但一个潜在的拐点已经到来,在这个拐点上,不燃尼古丁产品有可能取代香烟,并降低完全戒烟的吸烟者的风险。事实证明,这些产品令消费者满意,目前在全球范围内广泛且日益普及。这些尼古丁产品中最突出的一种是电子烟(ECs),每天都有数百万现在和以前的吸烟者使用。这类产品并非没有争议,因为这些产品并非没有风险,而且可能导致尼古丁依赖。科学评估ec的不同解释已经演变为不一致的法规和产品标准,为其分散的制造基础提供了一个环境,允许可变的产品质量,反过来,产品质量的可变性影响了他们如何看待。在这篇综述中,我们评估了已发表的科学证据,以评估总的来说,ec是否通过降低与吸烟相关的健康风险,为吸烟者提供一种可行的替代方案,同时对非吸烟者的吸引力有限,从而发挥了减少烟草危害的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信