Effectiveness of technology for braille literacy education for children: a systematic review.

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Rationality and Society Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-15 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2022.2070676
Elizabeth R Hoskin, Morag K Coyne, Michael J White, Stephan C D Dobri, T Claire Davies, Shane D Pinder
{"title":"Effectiveness of technology for braille literacy education for children: a systematic review.","authors":"Elizabeth R Hoskin, Morag K Coyne, Michael J White, Stephan C D Dobri, T Claire Davies, Shane D Pinder","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2022.2070676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the well-documented importance of braille for people who are blind or visually impaired, few studies explore technology for facilitating braille literacy education. Evaluations of the impact of using assistive devices on academics for children and youth who are blind or visually impaired are needed. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of technology used to support braille literacy education for children and youth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The population of interest was defined as children and youth aged 0-21 years who were blind or visually impaired, learning literacy through braille as their primary medium, and had not previously learned to read through sighted methods. Sixteen academic education, health sciences, multidisciplinary, rehabilitation, and engineering databases were searched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve peer-reviewed, English-language articles were included in the review evaluating a total of 176 participants. In general, the quality of research was low with little evidence to support the use of current technology for braille literacy education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standards of technology evaluation for braille literacy must be developed. Furthermore, assistive technologies for braille literacy education for children and youth should provide real-time auditory and tactile feedback, enable independent study/practice and editing of work, and be easy to use, motivational, and engaging. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONStandards must be developed to ensure technology evaluation is consistent among researchers and clinicians to achieve the best outcomes.Technologies for braille literacy education for children and youth should provide real-time auditory and tactile feedback, enable independent study/practice and editing of work, and be easy to use, motivational, and engaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":47079,"journal":{"name":"Rationality and Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"120-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rationality and Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2070676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the well-documented importance of braille for people who are blind or visually impaired, few studies explore technology for facilitating braille literacy education. Evaluations of the impact of using assistive devices on academics for children and youth who are blind or visually impaired are needed. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of technology used to support braille literacy education for children and youth.

Materials and methods: The population of interest was defined as children and youth aged 0-21 years who were blind or visually impaired, learning literacy through braille as their primary medium, and had not previously learned to read through sighted methods. Sixteen academic education, health sciences, multidisciplinary, rehabilitation, and engineering databases were searched.

Results: Twelve peer-reviewed, English-language articles were included in the review evaluating a total of 176 participants. In general, the quality of research was low with little evidence to support the use of current technology for braille literacy education.

Conclusions: Standards of technology evaluation for braille literacy must be developed. Furthermore, assistive technologies for braille literacy education for children and youth should provide real-time auditory and tactile feedback, enable independent study/practice and editing of work, and be easy to use, motivational, and engaging. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONStandards must be developed to ensure technology evaluation is consistent among researchers and clinicians to achieve the best outcomes.Technologies for braille literacy education for children and youth should provide real-time auditory and tactile feedback, enable independent study/practice and editing of work, and be easy to use, motivational, and engaging.

儿童盲文识字教育技术的有效性:系统回顾。
目的:尽管盲文对盲人或视障人士的重要性有目共睹,但很少有研究探讨促进盲文识字教育的技术。我们需要评估使用辅助设备对盲人或视障儿童和青少年学业的影响。本系统性综述旨在评估用于支持儿童和青少年盲文识字教育的技术的有效性:研究对象定义为 0-21 岁的盲童和青少年,他们是盲人或视力受损者,以盲文为主要媒介学习识字,之前没有通过视力正常的方法学习过阅读。检索了 16 个学术教育、健康科学、多学科、康复和工程数据库:共有 12 篇经同行评审的英文文章被纳入审查范围,共评估了 176 名参与者。总体而言,研究质量较低,几乎没有证据支持将当前技术用于盲文扫盲教育:结论:必须制定盲文扫盲技术评估标准。此外,用于儿童和青少年盲文识字教育的辅助技术应能提供实时的听觉和触觉反馈,能够独立学习/练习和编辑作品,并且易于使用、具有激励性和吸引力。儿童和青少年盲文识字教育技术应提供实时听觉和触觉反馈,能够独立学习/练习和编辑作业,并且易于使用、具有激励性和吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Rationality & Society focuses on the growing contributions of rational-action based theory, and the questions and controversies surrounding this growth. Why Choose Rationality and Society? The trend toward ever-greater specialization in many areas of intellectual life has lead to fragmentation that deprives scholars of the ability to communicate even in closely adjoining fields. The emergence of the rational action paradigm as the inter-lingua of the social sciences is a remarkable exception to this trend. It is the one paradigm that offers the promise of bringing greater theoretical unity across disciplines such as economics, sociology, political science, cognitive psychology, moral philosophy and law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信