Development, Organoleptic Evaluation and Acceptability of Products Developed by Incorporating Foxtail Millet

Zainab Fatima and Avanti Rao
{"title":"Development, Organoleptic Evaluation and Acceptability of Products Developed by Incorporating Foxtail Millet","authors":"Zainab Fatima and Avanti Rao","doi":"10.26502/JFSNR.2642-11000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Millets have been neglected despite the nutritive value and therapeutic use. Foxtail millet is highly nutritious, non-glutinous and non-acid forming food. They are a rich source of protein, fiber and neutraceutical components. Hence, they are soothing and easy to digest. The aim of the present study was to incorporate foxtail millet into six different recipes namingly, laddu, peanut chutney, panjeri, kheer, cutlet and chakli. Among these chakli was excluded due to its less acceptability. Remaining five recipes laddu, panjeri, kheer, cutlet, peanut chutney were well accepted. The products were evaluated by numerical scoring by 38 semi-trained panelists to asses overall acceptability. While considering these products, the highest score for overall acceptability was 84.2 for variation 1 in case of laddu, then 83.4 for variation 1 in case of kheer, 83.4 for variation 2 in case of panjeri and 82.6 for variation 1 in case of peanut chutney. The most acceptable products, namely laddu, kheer, peanut chutney, panjeri were subjected to hedonic rating test with 51 semi-trained panelists. The result showed that in case of kheer, variation 2 was more acceptable with the score of (8.10 ± 0.92) followed by (7.96 ± 0.85) for variation 1. In case of laddu, variation 2 was more acceptable with the score of (8.75 ± 0.52) followed by (8.33 ± 0.65) for variation 1. In case of peanut chutney, variation 1 was more acceptable with the score of (8.10 ± 0.67) followed by (7.94 ± 0.95) for variation 2. In case of panjeri, variation 2 was more acceptable with the score of (8.37 ± 0.85) followed by (8.16 ± 0.83) for variation 1. Data was analyzed using ANOVA, which shows a significant difference between variation 1 and variation 2 of laddu and kheer at 1% and 5% level of significance and no significant difference was observed between variation 1 and variation 2 of peanut chutney and panjeri at 1% and 5% level of significance. Hence, from the present study it can be concluded that foxtail millet can easily be incorporated into various recipes without affecting the sensory and nutritional qualities.","PeriodicalId":15858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/JFSNR.2642-11000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Millets have been neglected despite the nutritive value and therapeutic use. Foxtail millet is highly nutritious, non-glutinous and non-acid forming food. They are a rich source of protein, fiber and neutraceutical components. Hence, they are soothing and easy to digest. The aim of the present study was to incorporate foxtail millet into six different recipes namingly, laddu, peanut chutney, panjeri, kheer, cutlet and chakli. Among these chakli was excluded due to its less acceptability. Remaining five recipes laddu, panjeri, kheer, cutlet, peanut chutney were well accepted. The products were evaluated by numerical scoring by 38 semi-trained panelists to asses overall acceptability. While considering these products, the highest score for overall acceptability was 84.2 for variation 1 in case of laddu, then 83.4 for variation 1 in case of kheer, 83.4 for variation 2 in case of panjeri and 82.6 for variation 1 in case of peanut chutney. The most acceptable products, namely laddu, kheer, peanut chutney, panjeri were subjected to hedonic rating test with 51 semi-trained panelists. The result showed that in case of kheer, variation 2 was more acceptable with the score of (8.10 ± 0.92) followed by (7.96 ± 0.85) for variation 1. In case of laddu, variation 2 was more acceptable with the score of (8.75 ± 0.52) followed by (8.33 ± 0.65) for variation 1. In case of peanut chutney, variation 1 was more acceptable with the score of (8.10 ± 0.67) followed by (7.94 ± 0.95) for variation 2. In case of panjeri, variation 2 was more acceptable with the score of (8.37 ± 0.85) followed by (8.16 ± 0.83) for variation 1. Data was analyzed using ANOVA, which shows a significant difference between variation 1 and variation 2 of laddu and kheer at 1% and 5% level of significance and no significant difference was observed between variation 1 and variation 2 of peanut chutney and panjeri at 1% and 5% level of significance. Hence, from the present study it can be concluded that foxtail millet can easily be incorporated into various recipes without affecting the sensory and nutritional qualities.
含谷子产品的开发、感官评价及可接受性
尽管小米具有营养价值和治疗用途,但它一直被忽视。谷子是一种营养丰富、不粘不酸的食物。它们是蛋白质、纤维和中性成分的丰富来源。因此,它们是舒缓的,容易消化。本研究的目的是将谷子加入六种不同的食谱中,分别是laddu, peanut chutney, panjeri, kheer, cutlet和chakli。其中,chakli被排除在外,因为它的可接受性较低。剩下的五种食谱都很受欢迎,比如拉杜、潘杰里、酥油、肉排、花生酸辣酱。产品由38名半训练的小组成员通过数字评分来评估总体可接受性。在考虑这些产品时,变体1的总体可接受性得分最高为84.2分,变体1的可接受性得分为83.4分,变体1的可接受性得分为83.4分,变体2的可接受性得分为83.4分,变体1的可接受性得分为82.6分,变体1的可接受性得分为82.6分。最容易接受的产品,即ladu, kheer,花生酸辣酱,panjeri,由51名半训练小组成员进行了快乐评级测试。结果表明,对于heer,变异2得分为(8.10±0.92),变异1得分为(7.96±0.85),变异2得分较高。在laddu情况下,变异2得分为(8.75±0.52),变异1得分为(8.33±0.65),变异2得分较高。以花生酸辣酱为例,变异1得分为(8.10±0.67),变异2得分为(7.94±0.95),变异1得分较高。以panjeri为例,变异2得分为(8.37±0.85),较易被接受,变异1得分为(8.16±0.83)。对数据进行方差分析,变异1与变异2在1%和5%的显著水平上差异显著,变异1与变异2在1%和5%的显著水平上差异不显著。因此,从本研究可以得出结论,谷子可以很容易地加入到各种食谱中,而不会影响感官和营养品质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信