A feasibility study of local adaptation of Lung SBRT RapidPlan commercial model

Q4 Medicine
Haiyang Wang, Hao Wu, Xiaoyu Xiang, Yuliang Huang, Chenguang Li, Q. Hu, Yixiao Du, Jian Gong, Weibo Li, Yibao Zhang
{"title":"A feasibility study of local adaptation of Lung SBRT RapidPlan commercial model","authors":"Haiyang Wang, Hao Wu, Xiaoyu Xiang, Yuliang Huang, Chenguang Li, Q. Hu, Yixiao Du, Jian Gong, Weibo Li, Yibao Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the feasibility and optimization effect of modifying the Henry Ford Hospital (HFHS) RapidPlan model for stereotactic body radiation therapy planning based on local requirements. \n \n \nMethods \nThe following changes were made based on Henry Ford Health System(HFHS) Rapid Plan Lung SBRT model, taking the latest clinical guideline evidence and local clinical practice into account: Internal gross target volume(IGTV) and organ at risk(OAR) structure, lung, were added and set corresponding parameters.The upper value of planning target volume (PTV) was adjusted from 109% to 125%. The original training library was replaced with 73 local historical simultaneous integrated boosting plans, and statistical verification and outlier cleaning of the initial trained model were performed using Model Analytics software. Totally 10 cases not included in the model library were selected for independent verification, and automatic optimization result of the models before and after modifying were compared under the same beam condition. The following dosimetric parameters were compared after target dose normalization: conformal index (CI) of target volume, the mean doses, maximum doses and dose-volume parameters of OARs. \n \n \nResults \nThe \" tail\" of the PTV′s DVH and the \" shoulder\" and \" tail\" of the IGTV′s DVH of model M(local) validation plan (M(local)_P) performs higher than the original model HFHS (HFHS_P). The PTV_CI (1.07±0.13) of Mlocal_P were significantly smaller than HFHS_P (1.25±0.24) (Z=-2.497, P<0.05). Except for Heart_D15 cm3 and Heart_Dmax, most of the Mlocal_P dosimetric parameters of OARs were lower than HFHS_P, and the standard deviation was smaller. However, the difference of between two plans was no more than 3.06%. 10 HFHS_P plans don′t satisfy dose parameters requirement, two of which PTV_CI values are 1.52 and 1.74, far beyond the clinically acceptable range. \n \n \nConclusions \nCommercial model HFHS could be localized by replacing training library and adjusting parameters. Moreover, plans optimized by the modified model are local clinical acceptable in the aspects of target volume conformity and hotspots, and have a better performance in terms of OAR sparing and plan consistency. \n \n \nKey words: \nRadiotherapy planning; RapidPlan; Localize; Lung cancer; Stereotactic body radiation therapy","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"23 1","pages":"203-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility and optimization effect of modifying the Henry Ford Hospital (HFHS) RapidPlan model for stereotactic body radiation therapy planning based on local requirements. Methods The following changes were made based on Henry Ford Health System(HFHS) Rapid Plan Lung SBRT model, taking the latest clinical guideline evidence and local clinical practice into account: Internal gross target volume(IGTV) and organ at risk(OAR) structure, lung, were added and set corresponding parameters.The upper value of planning target volume (PTV) was adjusted from 109% to 125%. The original training library was replaced with 73 local historical simultaneous integrated boosting plans, and statistical verification and outlier cleaning of the initial trained model were performed using Model Analytics software. Totally 10 cases not included in the model library were selected for independent verification, and automatic optimization result of the models before and after modifying were compared under the same beam condition. The following dosimetric parameters were compared after target dose normalization: conformal index (CI) of target volume, the mean doses, maximum doses and dose-volume parameters of OARs. Results The " tail" of the PTV′s DVH and the " shoulder" and " tail" of the IGTV′s DVH of model M(local) validation plan (M(local)_P) performs higher than the original model HFHS (HFHS_P). The PTV_CI (1.07±0.13) of Mlocal_P were significantly smaller than HFHS_P (1.25±0.24) (Z=-2.497, P<0.05). Except for Heart_D15 cm3 and Heart_Dmax, most of the Mlocal_P dosimetric parameters of OARs were lower than HFHS_P, and the standard deviation was smaller. However, the difference of between two plans was no more than 3.06%. 10 HFHS_P plans don′t satisfy dose parameters requirement, two of which PTV_CI values are 1.52 and 1.74, far beyond the clinically acceptable range. Conclusions Commercial model HFHS could be localized by replacing training library and adjusting parameters. Moreover, plans optimized by the modified model are local clinical acceptable in the aspects of target volume conformity and hotspots, and have a better performance in terms of OAR sparing and plan consistency. Key words: Radiotherapy planning; RapidPlan; Localize; Lung cancer; Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Lung SBRT RapidPlan商业模型局部适应性的可行性研究
目的探讨根据当地需要对美国亨利福特医院(Henry Ford Hospital, HFHS)的RapidPlan模型进行立体定向放射治疗规划的可行性及优化效果。方法在亨利福特健康系统(HFHS)快速计划肺SBRT模型的基础上,结合最新的临床指南证据和当地临床实践,进行以下修改:增加肺内总靶体积(IGTV)和危险器官(OAR)结构,并设置相应参数。规划目标体积(PTV)上限由109%调整为125%。将原始训练库替换为73个本地历史同步集成提升计划,使用model Analytics软件对初始训练模型进行统计验证和离群点清洗。选取未纳入模型库的10个案例进行独立验证,比较相同梁条件下修改前后模型的自动优化结果。将靶剂量归一化后的剂量学参数:靶体积适形指数(CI)、平均剂量、最大剂量和OARs的剂量-体积参数进行比较。结果模型M(局部)验证方案(M(局部)_P)的PTV的DVH的“尾部”和IGTV的DVH的“肩部”和“尾部”均优于原模型HFHS (HFHS_P)。Mlocal_P的PTV_CI(1.07±0.13)显著小于HFHS_P(1.25±0.24)(Z=-2.497, P<0.05)。除Heart_D15 cm3和Heart_Dmax外,OARs的Mlocal_P剂量学参数大多低于HFHS_P,标准差较小。但两种方案的差异不超过3.06%。10个HFHS_P方案不满足剂量参数要求,其中2个方案PTV_CI值分别为1.52和1.74,远远超出临床可接受范围。结论通过更换训练库和调整参数,可实现HFHS商品化模型的本地化。改进模型优化后的方案在靶体积符合性和热点方面均为局部临床可接受的方案,在OAR保留和方案一致性方面表现更好。关键词:放疗计划;RapidPlan;本地化;肺癌;立体定向全身放射治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信