Verifying the calculation approach for radial suspension force based on the airgap flux density for SPM, consequent-pole, and bearingless AC homopolar motors

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Takahiro Noguchi, Hiroya Sugimoto, Yusuke Fujii, Akira Chiba
{"title":"Verifying the calculation approach for radial suspension force based on the airgap flux density for SPM, consequent-pole, and bearingless AC homopolar motors","authors":"Takahiro Noguchi,&nbsp;Hiroya Sugimoto,&nbsp;Yusuke Fujii,&nbsp;Akira Chiba","doi":"10.1002/eej.23404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, a calculation method is proposed for the radial suspension force of a bearingless motor with a surface-mounted permanent magnet (SPM) rotor, a consequent-pole permanent magnet (CPM) rotor, and a homopolar permanent rotor (HPM). The radial suspension forces are calculated mathematically and analytically using the airgap flux density. It was confirmed that the proposed radial force equations are practical to calculate the suspension force based on the airgap flux density. The CPM bearingless motor and bearingless AC HPM have salient pole rotors that interact with the 2-pole Magnetomotive force (MMF) to generate 6- and 10-pole components. As a result, the radial suspension force of the CPM bearingless motor is generated by 8- and 6-pole, and 8- and 10-pole magnetic flux, whereas the bearingless AC HPM produces the radial suspension force by DC and 2-pole components. The shaft torque, the suspension force, and efficiency were also compared for SPM, CPM bearingless motors, and bearingless AC HPM. Consequently, the torque value of the CPM bearingless motor is quite close to SPM bearingless motor. Moreover, the suspension force of the CPM bearingless motor is quite close to bearingless AC HPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50550,"journal":{"name":"Electrical Engineering in Japan","volume":"215 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrical Engineering in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eej.23404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a calculation method is proposed for the radial suspension force of a bearingless motor with a surface-mounted permanent magnet (SPM) rotor, a consequent-pole permanent magnet (CPM) rotor, and a homopolar permanent rotor (HPM). The radial suspension forces are calculated mathematically and analytically using the airgap flux density. It was confirmed that the proposed radial force equations are practical to calculate the suspension force based on the airgap flux density. The CPM bearingless motor and bearingless AC HPM have salient pole rotors that interact with the 2-pole Magnetomotive force (MMF) to generate 6- and 10-pole components. As a result, the radial suspension force of the CPM bearingless motor is generated by 8- and 6-pole, and 8- and 10-pole magnetic flux, whereas the bearingless AC HPM produces the radial suspension force by DC and 2-pole components. The shaft torque, the suspension force, and efficiency were also compared for SPM, CPM bearingless motors, and bearingless AC HPM. Consequently, the torque value of the CPM bearingless motor is quite close to SPM bearingless motor. Moreover, the suspension force of the CPM bearingless motor is quite close to bearingless AC HPM.

验证了基于气隙磁通密度计算SPM、结果极和无轴承交流同极电机径向悬浮力的方法
提出了一种面贴式永磁(SPM)转子、结果极式永磁(CPM)转子和同极式永磁(HPM)转子的无轴承电机径向悬浮力的计算方法。利用气隙磁通密度对径向悬架力进行了数学和解析计算。结果表明,基于气隙磁通密度计算悬架力的径向力方程是可行的。CPM无轴承电机和无轴承交流HPM具有凸极转子,与2极磁动势(MMF)相互作用,产生6极和10极组件。因此,CPM无轴承电机的径向悬浮力由8极和6极、8极和10极磁通量产生,而无轴承交流HPM的径向悬浮力由直流和2极磁通量产生。比较了SPM、CPM无轴承电机和无轴承交流HPM的轴转矩、悬架力和效率。因此,CPM无轴承电机的转矩值与SPM无轴承电机非常接近。此外,CPM无轴承电机的悬架力与无轴承交流HPM非常接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electrical Engineering in Japan
Electrical Engineering in Japan 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Electrical Engineering in Japan (EEJ) is an official journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEEJ). This authoritative journal is a translation of the Transactions of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. It publishes 16 issues a year on original research findings in Electrical Engineering with special focus on the science, technology and applications of electric power, such as power generation, transmission and conversion, electric railways (including magnetic levitation devices), motors, switching, power economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信