Measuring the research funding landscape: a case study of BRICS nations

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Sheikh Shueb, Sumeer Gul
{"title":"Measuring the research funding landscape: a case study of BRICS nations","authors":"Sheikh Shueb, Sumeer Gul","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-08-2022-0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to determine the funding ratio of BRICS nations in various research areas. The leading funding institutions that support research in the developing world have also been researched.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study involves the funding acknowledgment analysis of the data retrieved from the “Clarivate Analytics' InCites database” under “22 specific research areas” to determine whether the publication was funded.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study shows that China achieves the highest funding ratio of 88.6%, followed by Brazil (73.74%), Russia (72.93%) and South Africa (70.94%). However, India has the lowest funding ratio of 58.2%. For the subject areas, the highest funding ratio is by microbiology in Russia (86.6%), India (84.3%) and China (96.9%) and space science in Brazil (93.7%) and South Africa (94.82%). However, economics and business achieves the lowest funding ratio in Brazil (38.6%), India (20.1%) and South Africa (30.24%). Moreover, the regional funding agencies are the leading research sponsors in the BRICS nations.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study implies increasing the funding ratio across various research areas, including arts, humanities and social sciences. The nations, particularly India, also need to gear up sponsoring the research to improve the funding ratio for scientific development, bringing overall good.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study efforts to show the status of countries and research subjects in terms of funding ratio and reveals the prominent funders working toward scientific growth.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-08-2022-0192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the funding ratio of BRICS nations in various research areas. The leading funding institutions that support research in the developing world have also been researched. Design/methodology/approach This study involves the funding acknowledgment analysis of the data retrieved from the “Clarivate Analytics' InCites database” under “22 specific research areas” to determine whether the publication was funded. Findings This study shows that China achieves the highest funding ratio of 88.6%, followed by Brazil (73.74%), Russia (72.93%) and South Africa (70.94%). However, India has the lowest funding ratio of 58.2%. For the subject areas, the highest funding ratio is by microbiology in Russia (86.6%), India (84.3%) and China (96.9%) and space science in Brazil (93.7%) and South Africa (94.82%). However, economics and business achieves the lowest funding ratio in Brazil (38.6%), India (20.1%) and South Africa (30.24%). Moreover, the regional funding agencies are the leading research sponsors in the BRICS nations. Practical implications This study implies increasing the funding ratio across various research areas, including arts, humanities and social sciences. The nations, particularly India, also need to gear up sponsoring the research to improve the funding ratio for scientific development, bringing overall good. Originality/value This study efforts to show the status of countries and research subjects in terms of funding ratio and reveals the prominent funders working toward scientific growth.
衡量研究经费格局:以金砖国家为例
本研究的目的是确定金砖国家在各个研究领域的资助比例。还研究了支持发展中国家研究的主要资助机构。设计/方法/方法本研究涉及对“Clarivate Analytics’InCites数据库”中“22个特定研究领域”下检索的数据进行资助确认分析,以确定该出版物是否获得资助。本研究显示,中国的资助比例最高,为88.6%,其次是巴西(73.74%)、俄罗斯(72.93%)和南非(70.94%)。然而,印度的融资比例最低,为58.2%。在学科领域中,资助比例最高的是俄罗斯(86.6%)、印度(84.3%)和中国(96.9%)的微生物学,以及巴西(93.7%)和南非(94.82%)的空间科学。然而,经济和商业在巴西(38.6%)、印度(20.1%)和南非(30.24%)的融资比例最低。此外,地区资助机构是金砖国家主要的研究资助机构。实际意义本研究建议增加不同研究领域的拨款比例,包括艺术、人文和社会科学。这些国家,尤其是印度,还需要加大对这项研究的资助力度,以提高科学发展的资助比例,从而带来整体的好处。原创性/价值本研究旨在展示国家和研究课题在资助比例方面的地位,并揭示为科学增长而努力的杰出资助者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信