Dutch Norming Study For 208 Color Drawings Depicting Transitive Events

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Edwige Sijyeniyo, R. Hartsuiker, S. Bernolet
{"title":"Dutch Norming Study For 208 Color Drawings Depicting Transitive Events","authors":"Edwige Sijyeniyo, R. Hartsuiker, S. Bernolet","doi":"10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a norming study amongst Dutch children (6-12 years) to investigate whether they would correctly  interpret our set of 208 color drawings, developed for  longitudinal research on the production and comprehension of transitive sentences, if the transitive action on each drawing was described with an active or a  passive sentence. The children provided 93.02% correct answers to our pictures, which indicates that the pictures are clear in terms of how the transitive actions are displayed. There were several factors that contributed to an incorrect interpretation of a transitive action in a picture. (1) Pictures were more difficult to interpret when a passive  sentence was used to describe a transitive event compared to an active sentence; (2) children made more errors interpreting pictures when abstract verbs, such as  “inhalen” (to overtake) and “vervangen” (to replace), were used to describe a transitive event; (3) children had difficulty interpreting our pictures when particular verbs (“roepen” [to shout] and “volgen” [to follow]) were  presented in a passive sentence, while other verbs  (“blokkeren” [to block] and “inhalen”) rendered more  correct answers when the transitive event was described  with a passive sentence; finally, (4) younger children  provided more incorrect answers to our pictures than older children, regardless of whether the transitive action in the picture was described with an active or a passive sentence. In particular, the younger children provided significantly more incorrect answers to pictures with the verb “groeten” (to greet) compared to the older children. Because our set contains many verb-noun combinations, the set is very useful to researchers who intend to investigate the  acquisition of transitive structures in children in a  longitudinal design, not only for studies with typically developing children, but also in studies with children who  have a delay in their language development. Keywords: Norming study, picture set, transitive structures, L1 syntax acquisition.","PeriodicalId":38590,"journal":{"name":"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a norming study amongst Dutch children (6-12 years) to investigate whether they would correctly  interpret our set of 208 color drawings, developed for  longitudinal research on the production and comprehension of transitive sentences, if the transitive action on each drawing was described with an active or a  passive sentence. The children provided 93.02% correct answers to our pictures, which indicates that the pictures are clear in terms of how the transitive actions are displayed. There were several factors that contributed to an incorrect interpretation of a transitive action in a picture. (1) Pictures were more difficult to interpret when a passive  sentence was used to describe a transitive event compared to an active sentence; (2) children made more errors interpreting pictures when abstract verbs, such as  “inhalen” (to overtake) and “vervangen” (to replace), were used to describe a transitive event; (3) children had difficulty interpreting our pictures when particular verbs (“roepen” [to shout] and “volgen” [to follow]) were  presented in a passive sentence, while other verbs  (“blokkeren” [to block] and “inhalen”) rendered more  correct answers when the transitive event was described  with a passive sentence; finally, (4) younger children  provided more incorrect answers to our pictures than older children, regardless of whether the transitive action in the picture was described with an active or a passive sentence. In particular, the younger children provided significantly more incorrect answers to pictures with the verb “groeten” (to greet) compared to the older children. Because our set contains many verb-noun combinations, the set is very useful to researchers who intend to investigate the  acquisition of transitive structures in children in a  longitudinal design, not only for studies with typically developing children, but also in studies with children who  have a delay in their language development. Keywords: Norming study, picture set, transitive structures, L1 syntax acquisition.
荷兰208幅及物事件彩色绘画规范研究
我们在荷兰儿童(6-12岁)中进行了一项规范研究,以调查他们是否能够正确地解释我们的208幅彩色图画,如果每张图画上的及物动作用主动或被动句子来描述,这些图画是为了对及物句的产生和理解进行纵向研究而开发的。孩子们对我们的图片给出了93.02%的正确答案,这表明图片在及物动作的展示方式上是清晰的。有几个因素导致了对图片中及物动作的错误解释。(1)用被动句描述及物事件比用主动句描述及物事件更难理解图片;(2)当使用抽象动词如“inhalen”(超越)和“vervangen”(取代)来描述及物事件时,儿童在解释图片时出现更多错误;(3)当特定动词(“roepen”[大喊]和“volgen”[跟随])以被动句呈现时,儿童在理解我们的图片时出现困难,而其他动词(“blokkeren”[阻挡]和“inhalen”)以被动句描述及物事件时呈现出更正确的答案;最后,(4)无论图片中的及物动作是用主动句还是被动句来描述,年龄较小的儿童比年龄较大的儿童提供了更多的错误答案。特别是,与年龄较大的孩子相比,年龄较小的孩子对带有动词“groeten”(迎接)的图片给出的错误答案明显更多。因为我们的集合包含了许多动词-名词组合,所以这个集合对于那些打算在纵向设计中研究儿童及物结构习得的研究人员非常有用,不仅适用于典型发育儿童的研究,也适用于语言发展迟缓的儿童的研究。关键词:规范化学习,图片集,及物结构,母语语法习得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie
Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信