A "Safe Space" to Debate Colonial Legacy

IF 0.3 0 ART
Johanna T Zetterstrom-Sharp, Chris Wingfield
{"title":"A \"Safe Space\" to Debate Colonial Legacy","authors":"Johanna T Zetterstrom-Sharp, Chris Wingfield","doi":"10.3167/armw.2019.070102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2016, students at Jesus College, Cambridge voted unanimously to repatriate to Nigeria a bronze cockerel looted during the violent British expedition into Benin City in 1897. The college, however, decided to temporarily relocate Okukor to the University’s Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. This article outlines the discussions that occurred during this process, exploring how the Museum was positioned as a safe space in which uncomfortable colonial legacies, including institutionalized racism and cultural patrimony rights, could be debated. We explore how a stated commitment to postcolonial dialogue ultimately worked to circumvent a call for postcolonial action. Drawing on Ann Stoler’s and Elizabeth Edwards’s discussions of colonial aphasia, this article argues that anthropology museums risk enabling such circumvention despite confronting their own institutional colonial legacies.","PeriodicalId":40959,"journal":{"name":"Museum Worlds","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Museum Worlds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2019.070102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In February 2016, students at Jesus College, Cambridge voted unanimously to repatriate to Nigeria a bronze cockerel looted during the violent British expedition into Benin City in 1897. The college, however, decided to temporarily relocate Okukor to the University’s Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. This article outlines the discussions that occurred during this process, exploring how the Museum was positioned as a safe space in which uncomfortable colonial legacies, including institutionalized racism and cultural patrimony rights, could be debated. We explore how a stated commitment to postcolonial dialogue ultimately worked to circumvent a call for postcolonial action. Drawing on Ann Stoler’s and Elizabeth Edwards’s discussions of colonial aphasia, this article argues that anthropology museums risk enabling such circumvention despite confronting their own institutional colonial legacies.
讨论殖民遗产的“安全空间”
2016年2月,剑桥大学耶稣学院的学生一致投票决定,将1897年英国暴力入侵贝宁城时掠夺的一只青铜公鸡归还给尼日利亚。然而,该学院决定暂时将Okukor搬迁到大学的考古和人类学博物馆。本文概述了在这个过程中发生的讨论,探讨了博物馆如何定位为一个安全的空间,在这个空间中,令人不安的殖民遗产,包括制度化的种族主义和文化遗产权利,可以进行辩论。我们探讨了对后殖民对话的明确承诺如何最终规避了对后殖民行动的呼吁。借鉴安·斯托勒(Ann Stoler)和伊丽莎白·爱德华兹(Elizabeth Edwards)对殖民失语症的讨论,本文认为,人类学博物馆尽管面临着自己的殖民遗产,但却有可能使这种规避成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信