Double Casing Exit for Side-Track to Commingle Two Borehole Sizes Based Sections in One Slim Shot to Well TD

Meshal Al-Khaldi, Dhari Al-Saadi, Mohammad Al-Ajmi, Abhijit Dutta, Ibrahim Elafify, N. Farhi, W. Nouh
{"title":"Double Casing Exit for Side-Track to Commingle Two Borehole Sizes Based Sections in One Slim Shot to Well TD","authors":"Meshal Al-Khaldi, Dhari Al-Saadi, Mohammad Al-Ajmi, Abhijit Dutta, Ibrahim Elafify, N. Farhi, W. Nouh","doi":"10.2118/204881-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This project began when a 9-5/8\" in 43.5 ppf production casing became inaccessible due to the existing cemented pipe inside, preventing further reservoir section exposure and necessitating a mechanical side-track meanwhile introducing the challenge of loosing one section and imposimg slim hole challenges. The size and weight of the double-casing made for challenging drilling, as did the eight very different formations, which were drilled. The side-track was accomplished in two steps, an 8½ in hole followed by a single long 6⅛ in section, rather than the three steps (16 in, 12¼ in, 8½ in) that are typically required.\n The optimal kick off point carfully located across the dual casing by running electromagnetic diagnostics, the casing collar locator, and the cement bond log. The double casing mill was carefully tailored to successfully accomplish the exit in one run. Moreover, an extra 26 ft. MD rathole was drilled, which helped to eliminate the mud motor elongation run. A rotary steerable system was utilized directly in a directional BHA to drill an 8½ in open hole building section from vertical to a 30⁰ inclination. A 7.0 in liner was then set to isolate weak zones at the equivalent depth of the outer casing (13-3/8\"). Subsequently, a single 6⅛ in section was drilled to the well TD through the lower eight formations.\n Drilling a 6⅛ in section through eight formations came with a variety of challenges. These formations have different challenging behaviors relative to the wellbore pressure that typically leads to the drilling being done in two sections. Modeling the geo-mechanical characteristics of each formation allowed the determination of a mud weight range and rheology that would stabilize the wellbore through all eight formations. The slim, 6⅛ in, hole was stabilized with higher equivalent circulating density (ECD) values than is typically used in larger boreholes. Optimizing mud weight and drilling parameters, while managing differential sticking with close monitoring of real-time ECD, helped to stabilize the high-pressurized zones to deliver the well to the desired TD with a single borehole.\n This project represents the first time in Kuwait that double casings in such large sizes have been cut and sidetracked. It is also the first time these eight formations have been cut across such a smaller hole size, slim hole (6⅛ in) in a single shot. Geo-mechanical modeling allowed us to stabilize the pressurized formations and to control the ECD. The well also deployed the longest production liner in the field commingling multiple reservoirs with differnt pore pressure ramps, with excellent cement quality providing optimal zonal isolation.","PeriodicalId":11094,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204881-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This project began when a 9-5/8" in 43.5 ppf production casing became inaccessible due to the existing cemented pipe inside, preventing further reservoir section exposure and necessitating a mechanical side-track meanwhile introducing the challenge of loosing one section and imposimg slim hole challenges. The size and weight of the double-casing made for challenging drilling, as did the eight very different formations, which were drilled. The side-track was accomplished in two steps, an 8½ in hole followed by a single long 6⅛ in section, rather than the three steps (16 in, 12¼ in, 8½ in) that are typically required. The optimal kick off point carfully located across the dual casing by running electromagnetic diagnostics, the casing collar locator, and the cement bond log. The double casing mill was carefully tailored to successfully accomplish the exit in one run. Moreover, an extra 26 ft. MD rathole was drilled, which helped to eliminate the mud motor elongation run. A rotary steerable system was utilized directly in a directional BHA to drill an 8½ in open hole building section from vertical to a 30⁰ inclination. A 7.0 in liner was then set to isolate weak zones at the equivalent depth of the outer casing (13-3/8"). Subsequently, a single 6⅛ in section was drilled to the well TD through the lower eight formations. Drilling a 6⅛ in section through eight formations came with a variety of challenges. These formations have different challenging behaviors relative to the wellbore pressure that typically leads to the drilling being done in two sections. Modeling the geo-mechanical characteristics of each formation allowed the determination of a mud weight range and rheology that would stabilize the wellbore through all eight formations. The slim, 6⅛ in, hole was stabilized with higher equivalent circulating density (ECD) values than is typically used in larger boreholes. Optimizing mud weight and drilling parameters, while managing differential sticking with close monitoring of real-time ECD, helped to stabilize the high-pressurized zones to deliver the well to the desired TD with a single borehole. This project represents the first time in Kuwait that double casings in such large sizes have been cut and sidetracked. It is also the first time these eight formations have been cut across such a smaller hole size, slim hole (6⅛ in) in a single shot. Geo-mechanical modeling allowed us to stabilize the pressurized formations and to control the ECD. The well also deployed the longest production liner in the field commingling multiple reservoirs with differnt pore pressure ramps, with excellent cement quality providing optimal zonal isolation.
侧道双套管出口,可将两个基于井眼尺寸的井段在一次小射孔中合并至井深
该项目开始时,由于现有的胶结管,43.5 ppf的9-5/8”生产套管无法进入,防止了进一步的油藏部分暴露,需要机械侧钻,同时带来了一个部分的松动和小井眼的挑战。双套管的尺寸和重量给钻井带来了挑战,同时也给8个不同的地层带来了挑战。侧钻分两步完成,先钻一个8.5英寸的井眼,然后钻一个长6⅛英寸的井眼,而不是通常需要的三步(16英寸、12¼英寸、8½英寸)。通过电磁诊断、套管接箍定位仪和水泥胶结测井,确定了双套管的最佳起井点。双套管磨铣机经过精心设计,能够一次钻完井。此外,还额外钻了一个26英尺的MD大孔,这有助于消除泥浆马达延伸下入。在定向BHA中直接使用旋转导向系统,从垂直斜度到30⁰斜度,钻出了8.5英寸的裸眼建筑段。然后下入7.0的尾管,在套管的等效深度(13-3/8”)隔离薄弱区域。随后,通过下8层地层,钻一段6⅛英寸的井眼至井TD。在8层地层中钻6⅛英寸井眼面临着各种各样的挑战。这些地层相对于井筒压力具有不同的挑战性行为,通常导致钻井分两段进行。通过对每个地层的地质力学特征进行建模,可以确定泥浆比重范围和流变性,从而在所有8个地层中稳定井筒。与通常用于大井眼的等效循环密度(ECD)相比,6⅛英寸小井眼的稳定性更高。优化泥浆比重和钻井参数,同时通过密切监测实时ECD来控制压差粘连,有助于稳定高压区域,从而通过单井眼将井送到期望的TD。该项目是科威特首次采用如此大尺寸的双套管进行切割和侧钻。这也是这8个地层首次在一次射孔中钻过如此小的井眼尺寸(6⅛英寸)。地质力学建模使我们能够稳定加压地层并控制ECD。该井还采用了现场最长的生产尾管,将不同孔隙压力梯度的多个储层混合在一起,具有出色的水泥质量,提供了最佳的层间隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信