Clinical and psychological ground of principles of prognostication of premature delivery risk

V. Siusiuka, V. Potapov, A. Shevchenko, O.D. Kyryliuk, N. Guba, N. Mosol
{"title":"Clinical and psychological ground of principles of prognostication of premature delivery risk","authors":"V. Siusiuka, V. Potapov, A. Shevchenko, O.D. Kyryliuk, N. Guba, N. Mosol","doi":"10.30841/2708-8731.6.2022.267683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective: to assess the diagnostic significance of anamnestic and clinical-psychological factors and develop the prediction criteria for the threat of premature birth (PB). Materials and methods. An analysis of the data of pregnant women who were tested in the II and early III trimesters (screening is the I stage of the study) was carried out. The pregnant women were conditionally divided into two groups. The main group included 30 women whose further course of pregnancy was complicated by the threat of PB. The comparison group included 222 women without clinical manifestations of threat of PB during the current pregnancy. During the II stage of the study, the systematization of existing anamnestic and clinical-psychological factors among the examined women was performed. At the III stage, a comparative analysis of the frequency of the symptoms identified at the I stage was carried out in pregnant women in groups with the calculation of diagnostic coefficients (DC) of measures of informativeness (MI) according to formulas. Diagnostic (prognostic) tables were created for each factor, DC and MI were calculated based on the ratio of frequencies. According to the methodology for calculating the accuracy of the diagnostic decision to achieve a probability level of 95 % (p=0.05), the limit ∑DC is a constant = ±13, to achieve a probability of 99 % = ±20, to achieve a probability of 99.9% = ±30. If there is a factor in the column of the scale that is not included in the spectrum of exclusions, put a check mark in the “yes” column of the corresponding row. In the absence of such a check mark is placed in the “no” column of the corresponding row. Regarding the filling of each row, the sum of DC is calculated by adding up the indicated DCs, in the case of reaching the value of ∑DC, a preliminary diagnostic conclusion is made about the probability for threat of PB (at ∑DC = -13), which has a confidence level of 95 % (p=0.05). If the value of ∑DK = -20 is reached, a final diagnostic conclusion is made about the probability of 99 % for threat of PB (p=0.01). If the limit of the range is -13 < ∑DC < +13, the conclusion is significant because in such case its “p” is > 0.05.Results. Based on the values ​​of DC and MI of Kullbak (valid signs), a clinical scale to predict threat of PB with a confidence level of 95 % (p=0.05) or 99 % (p=0.01) was developed. Among the informative signs (factors) for predicting of threat of PB the following factors were established: spontaneous miscarriage in the anamnesis, high personal and situational anxiety (45 points and above), IV and more pregnancies and artificial abortion in the anamnesis, as well as the level of neuroticism (16 points and above). Conclusions. It has been established that anamnestic and clinical-psychological factors, namely, miscarriage in the anamnesis, artificial abortion in the anamnesis, IV and more pregnancies, high levels of personal and situational anxiety and neuroticism, are important and effective criteria for predicting the threat of premature birth.","PeriodicalId":21003,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive health of woman","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive health of woman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.6.2022.267683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective: to assess the diagnostic significance of anamnestic and clinical-psychological factors and develop the prediction criteria for the threat of premature birth (PB). Materials and methods. An analysis of the data of pregnant women who were tested in the II and early III trimesters (screening is the I stage of the study) was carried out. The pregnant women were conditionally divided into two groups. The main group included 30 women whose further course of pregnancy was complicated by the threat of PB. The comparison group included 222 women without clinical manifestations of threat of PB during the current pregnancy. During the II stage of the study, the systematization of existing anamnestic and clinical-psychological factors among the examined women was performed. At the III stage, a comparative analysis of the frequency of the symptoms identified at the I stage was carried out in pregnant women in groups with the calculation of diagnostic coefficients (DC) of measures of informativeness (MI) according to formulas. Diagnostic (prognostic) tables were created for each factor, DC and MI were calculated based on the ratio of frequencies. According to the methodology for calculating the accuracy of the diagnostic decision to achieve a probability level of 95 % (p=0.05), the limit ∑DC is a constant = ±13, to achieve a probability of 99 % = ±20, to achieve a probability of 99.9% = ±30. If there is a factor in the column of the scale that is not included in the spectrum of exclusions, put a check mark in the “yes” column of the corresponding row. In the absence of such a check mark is placed in the “no” column of the corresponding row. Regarding the filling of each row, the sum of DC is calculated by adding up the indicated DCs, in the case of reaching the value of ∑DC, a preliminary diagnostic conclusion is made about the probability for threat of PB (at ∑DC = -13), which has a confidence level of 95 % (p=0.05). If the value of ∑DK = -20 is reached, a final diagnostic conclusion is made about the probability of 99 % for threat of PB (p=0.01). If the limit of the range is -13 < ∑DC < +13, the conclusion is significant because in such case its “p” is > 0.05.Results. Based on the values ​​of DC and MI of Kullbak (valid signs), a clinical scale to predict threat of PB with a confidence level of 95 % (p=0.05) or 99 % (p=0.01) was developed. Among the informative signs (factors) for predicting of threat of PB the following factors were established: spontaneous miscarriage in the anamnesis, high personal and situational anxiety (45 points and above), IV and more pregnancies and artificial abortion in the anamnesis, as well as the level of neuroticism (16 points and above). Conclusions. It has been established that anamnestic and clinical-psychological factors, namely, miscarriage in the anamnesis, artificial abortion in the anamnesis, IV and more pregnancies, high levels of personal and situational anxiety and neuroticism, are important and effective criteria for predicting the threat of premature birth.
早产风险预测原则的临床和心理基础
目的:评价健忘症和临床心理因素对早产儿的诊断意义,制定早产儿威胁的预测标准。材料和方法。对妊娠中期和妊娠早期(筛查是研究的第一阶段)接受检测的孕妇的数据进行了分析。孕妇被有条件地分成两组。主要组包括30名因PB威胁而使妊娠进程复杂化的妇女。对照组222例妊娠期无PB威胁临床表现的妇女。在研究的第二阶段,在被检查的妇女中进行了现有的健忘症和临床心理因素的系统化。在第三阶段,对各组孕妇在第一阶段确定的症状频率进行比较分析,并根据公式计算信息性测量(MI)的诊断系数(DC)。为每个因素创建诊断(预后)表,根据频率比计算DC和MI。根据计算方法,诊断决策的准确率达到95%的概率水平(p=0.05),限定∑DC为常数=±13,达到99%的概率=±20,达到99.9%的概率=±30。如果在量表的一列中有一个因素未包括在排除范围内,则在对应行的“是”列中打勾。如果没有这样的复选标记,则在相应行的“否”列中放置。对于每一行的填充,将指示的DC相加计算DC的总和,当达到∑DC值时,对PB(∑DC = -13)的威胁概率作出初步诊断结论,置信水平为95% (p=0.05)。若达到∑DK = -20,则最终诊断结论PB威胁的概率为99% (p=0.01)。当极限值为-13 <∑DC < +13时,其“p”> 0.05,该结论具有显著性。根据DC和MI值(有效体征),编制预测PB威胁的临床量表,置信度分别为95% (p=0.05)和99% (p=0.01)。在预测PB威胁的信息标志(因素)中,建立了以下因素:健忘症中自然流产,个人和情境高度焦虑(45分及以上),健忘症中IV次及以上妊娠和人工流产,神经质水平(16分及以上)。结论。已有研究表明,记忆和临床心理因素,即记忆期流产、记忆期人工流产、四次及多次妊娠、高水平的个人和情境焦虑和神经质,是预测早产威胁的重要和有效标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信