The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Outcomes for Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures Using a Novel Combination of Needle-Knife Stricturoplasty, Balloon Dilation, and Steroid Injection (with Video).

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Andrew Canakis, Varun Kesar, Benjamin Twery, Osman Ali, Justin Canakis, Caleb Hudspath, Eric M Goldberg
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Outcomes for Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures Using a Novel Combination of Needle-Knife Stricturoplasty, Balloon Dilation, and Steroid Injection (with Video).","authors":"Andrew Canakis, Varun Kesar, Benjamin Twery, Osman Ali, Justin Canakis, Caleb Hudspath, Eric M Goldberg","doi":"10.1159/000527770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Benign esophageal strictures often present with dysphagia and can significantly impair a patient's quality of life, especially when refractory to standard endoscopic techniques. When repeat dilations fail to achieve an adequate luminal diameter or resolve dysphagia, further therapy with needle-knife or steroid injections is needed. However, patients can still clinically fail. To manage such strictures, we employed a novel combination of all three techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center case series of adult patients with benign strictures that were refractory to conventional endoscopic therapy and removable self-expanding metal stenting. Primary clinical success was defined as complete resolution in dysphagia. Secondary outcomes included periodic dilation index (frequency of dilations over the follow-up time), esophageal diameter changes, technical success, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four patients (median age 49.7 years old, interquartile range [IQR] 30-59) underwent endoscopic therapy for complex, benign strictures using our triple therapy technique. Etiologies of the strictures included peptic strictures (<i>n</i> = 3) and an anastomotic stricture (<i>n</i> = 1). There was 100% technical success rate with no associated adverse events. There was a 50% clinical success rate, with 1 additional patient having partial improvement in dysphagia. The median diameter of the esophagus before and after triple therapy was 3.2 mm (IQR 3.5-5.5) and 12.8 mm (IQR 11.7-14.2), respectively. The periodic dilation index was 6.3 before and 1.5 after triple therapy. The median length of follow-up was 362.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Triple combination therapy may be useful in benign strictures that are refractory to standard techniques. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":"48 1","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Benign esophageal strictures often present with dysphagia and can significantly impair a patient's quality of life, especially when refractory to standard endoscopic techniques. When repeat dilations fail to achieve an adequate luminal diameter or resolve dysphagia, further therapy with needle-knife or steroid injections is needed. However, patients can still clinically fail. To manage such strictures, we employed a novel combination of all three techniques.

Methods: Single-center case series of adult patients with benign strictures that were refractory to conventional endoscopic therapy and removable self-expanding metal stenting. Primary clinical success was defined as complete resolution in dysphagia. Secondary outcomes included periodic dilation index (frequency of dilations over the follow-up time), esophageal diameter changes, technical success, and complications.

Results: Four patients (median age 49.7 years old, interquartile range [IQR] 30-59) underwent endoscopic therapy for complex, benign strictures using our triple therapy technique. Etiologies of the strictures included peptic strictures (n = 3) and an anastomotic stricture (n = 1). There was 100% technical success rate with no associated adverse events. There was a 50% clinical success rate, with 1 additional patient having partial improvement in dysphagia. The median diameter of the esophagus before and after triple therapy was 3.2 mm (IQR 3.5-5.5) and 12.8 mm (IQR 11.7-14.2), respectively. The periodic dilation index was 6.3 before and 1.5 after triple therapy. The median length of follow-up was 362.5 days.

Conclusion: Triple combination therapy may be useful in benign strictures that are refractory to standard techniques. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

使用针刀狭窄成形术、球囊扩张术和类固醇注射的新组合治疗难治性良性食管狭窄的有效性和安全性(附视频)。
背景和目的:良性食管狭窄常伴有吞咽困难,严重影响患者的生活质量,尤其是在标准内镜技术难治的情况下。当重复扩张无法获得足够的管腔直径或解决吞咽困难时,就需要使用针刀或类固醇注射进行进一步治疗。然而,患者仍有可能出现临床治疗失败。为了治疗这类狭窄,我们采用了一种将上述三种技术相结合的新方法:单中心病例系列:常规内窥镜治疗和可拆卸自膨胀金属支架治疗无效的良性狭窄成年患者。主要临床成功定义为吞咽困难完全缓解。次要结果包括定期扩张指数(随访期间的扩张频率)、食管直径变化、技术成功率和并发症:四名患者(中位年龄 49.7 岁,四分位数间距 [IQR] 30-59)采用我们的三联疗法技术对复杂的良性狭窄进行了内窥镜治疗。狭窄的病因包括消化性狭窄(3 例)和吻合口狭窄(1 例)。技术成功率为 100%,无相关不良反应。临床成功率为 50%,另有一名患者的吞咽困难得到部分改善。三联疗法前后食道的中位直径分别为 3.2 毫米(IQR 3.5-5.5)和 12.8 毫米(IQR 11.7-14.2)。三联疗法前的周期性扩张指数为 6.3,三联疗法后为 1.5。中位随访时间为362.5天:结论:三联疗法可能适用于标准技术难治的良性狭窄。需要更大规模的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信