Prevalence, precision, and road safety implications of using faulty speedometers among commercial drivers in Ghana

IF 2.2
James Damsere-Derry, F. Afukaar, C. Mock, P. Donkor
{"title":"Prevalence, precision, and road safety implications of using faulty speedometers among commercial drivers in Ghana","authors":"James Damsere-Derry, F. Afukaar, C. Mock, P. Donkor","doi":"10.1080/21650020.2022.2093267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Vehicular speed is a significant risk factor for road crashes globally. The first objective was to establish the proportion of motorists who drive with faulty speedometers. Second, the study sought to establish procedures used to determine speeds when speedometers are defective. The third objective was to establish the precision with which motorists determine driving speeds with faulty speedometers. Convenience sampling was used to interview 124 professional drivers at 16 bus terminals in Kumasi to understand their speeding behaviors and perceptions on the accuracy of using defective speedometers. Secondly, drivers using defective speedometers were purposively nested for real-life driving tests in which their self-reported speeds were concurrently compared with actual speed measurements made with android-speedometers. Results show that 58% of drivers used defective speedometers. Ninety-six percentof the drivers with defective speedometers were confident that they could precisely tell their travelling speeds through procedures such as driving experiences, personal judgment, intruding wind, engine sound, and poking hands outside cars, thereby underestimating their actual speeds. In the driving tests, mean self-reported speed (58.7 ± 5.2 km/h) was significantly lower than measured speed (64.6 ± 8.9 km/h; p = 0.0003). This research has implications for road safety enforcement, education, and advocacy.","PeriodicalId":90388,"journal":{"name":"Urban, planning and transport research","volume":"13 1","pages":"358 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban, planning and transport research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2093267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Vehicular speed is a significant risk factor for road crashes globally. The first objective was to establish the proportion of motorists who drive with faulty speedometers. Second, the study sought to establish procedures used to determine speeds when speedometers are defective. The third objective was to establish the precision with which motorists determine driving speeds with faulty speedometers. Convenience sampling was used to interview 124 professional drivers at 16 bus terminals in Kumasi to understand their speeding behaviors and perceptions on the accuracy of using defective speedometers. Secondly, drivers using defective speedometers were purposively nested for real-life driving tests in which their self-reported speeds were concurrently compared with actual speed measurements made with android-speedometers. Results show that 58% of drivers used defective speedometers. Ninety-six percentof the drivers with defective speedometers were confident that they could precisely tell their travelling speeds through procedures such as driving experiences, personal judgment, intruding wind, engine sound, and poking hands outside cars, thereby underestimating their actual speeds. In the driving tests, mean self-reported speed (58.7 ± 5.2 km/h) was significantly lower than measured speed (64.6 ± 8.9 km/h; p = 0.0003). This research has implications for road safety enforcement, education, and advocacy.
在加纳的商业司机中使用故障速度计的普遍性、精度和道路安全影响
车辆速度是全球道路交通事故的一个重要危险因素。第一个目标是确定有故障速度计驾驶的驾驶者的比例。其次,该研究试图建立在速度计有缺陷时确定速度的程序。第三个目标是确定驾驶员在有故障的速度计上确定行驶速度的精度。采用方便抽样的方法,对库马西16个公交总站的124名职业司机进行了访谈,了解他们的超速行为和对使用缺陷速度计准确性的看法。其次,故意将使用有缺陷的速度计的驾驶员嵌套在现实驾驶测试中,将他们自我报告的速度与使用机器人速度计测量的实际速度同时进行比较。结果显示,58%的司机使用了有缺陷的速度计。96%的速度计有缺陷的司机相信,他们可以通过驾驶经验、个人判断、干扰的风、发动机声音和把手伸出车外等程序准确地判断出自己的行驶速度,从而低估了自己的实际速度。在驾驶测试中,自述平均速度(58.7±5.2 km/h)显著低于实测值(64.6±8.9 km/h);P = 0.0003)。本研究对道路安全执法、教育和宣传具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书