Constitutionalization of criminal law: the problem of defining the object and subject of the legal process

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
O. Guzeeva
{"title":"Constitutionalization of criminal law: the problem of defining the object and subject of the legal process","authors":"O. Guzeeva","doi":"10.17223/22253513/43/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The constitutionalization of criminal law is a complex and multi-level process of translating constitutional ideas and values into criminal law and the practice of its application. This is a controlled and directed process, which, from the point of view of its structural and functional analysis, presupposes the presence of a well-defined object of influence and subjects of constitutionalization. The object-subject characteristic of the constitutionalization of criminal law in branch science has not been studied. In the article, the author solves this urgent problem based on the application of a systematic approach within the framework of the implementation of the requirements of structural and functional analysis. The constitutionalization of criminal law is understood in this work as a process of substantive concretization of constitutional principles and standards in the practice of criminal law regulation. Proceeding from the fact that such regulation is an organic unity of the law and the practice of its application, the author, nevertheless, argues that the phenomenon of criminal law practice itself, as an element of the object of constitutionalization of criminal law, should be limited, excluding from its scope institutional and procedural characteristics of the practice, and leaving only its results in the form of the content, interpretation and meaning of the criminal law norms created by the parliament and applied by the court in a particular case. As a result, it is concluded that the object of constitutionalization in criminal law is precisely the criminal law norms expressed in the sources of law, which are given a particular interpretation in the process of law enforcement. When analyzing the subjects of the constitutionalization of criminal law, there is widespread opinion in science that this is exclusively the Constitutional Court of Russia is critically assessed. It is proved that, in addition to it, the subjects of constitutionalization are: parliament and courts of general jurisdiction. This made it possible to classify the subjects of constitutionalization, depending on the moment at which criminal regulation they are connected to ensure its constitutionality. “Primary” subjects of constitutionalization (parliament and court of general jurisdiction) carry out perspective constitutionalization, using constitutional principles and norms to regulate public relations, creating and applying criminal law norms. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is empowered to carry out retrospective constitutionalization of the already declared legal matter through constitutional justice, which makes it possible to recognize it as a \"secondary\" subject of the constitutionalization of criminal law. The author declares no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/43/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The constitutionalization of criminal law is a complex and multi-level process of translating constitutional ideas and values into criminal law and the practice of its application. This is a controlled and directed process, which, from the point of view of its structural and functional analysis, presupposes the presence of a well-defined object of influence and subjects of constitutionalization. The object-subject characteristic of the constitutionalization of criminal law in branch science has not been studied. In the article, the author solves this urgent problem based on the application of a systematic approach within the framework of the implementation of the requirements of structural and functional analysis. The constitutionalization of criminal law is understood in this work as a process of substantive concretization of constitutional principles and standards in the practice of criminal law regulation. Proceeding from the fact that such regulation is an organic unity of the law and the practice of its application, the author, nevertheless, argues that the phenomenon of criminal law practice itself, as an element of the object of constitutionalization of criminal law, should be limited, excluding from its scope institutional and procedural characteristics of the practice, and leaving only its results in the form of the content, interpretation and meaning of the criminal law norms created by the parliament and applied by the court in a particular case. As a result, it is concluded that the object of constitutionalization in criminal law is precisely the criminal law norms expressed in the sources of law, which are given a particular interpretation in the process of law enforcement. When analyzing the subjects of the constitutionalization of criminal law, there is widespread opinion in science that this is exclusively the Constitutional Court of Russia is critically assessed. It is proved that, in addition to it, the subjects of constitutionalization are: parliament and courts of general jurisdiction. This made it possible to classify the subjects of constitutionalization, depending on the moment at which criminal regulation they are connected to ensure its constitutionality. “Primary” subjects of constitutionalization (parliament and court of general jurisdiction) carry out perspective constitutionalization, using constitutional principles and norms to regulate public relations, creating and applying criminal law norms. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is empowered to carry out retrospective constitutionalization of the already declared legal matter through constitutional justice, which makes it possible to recognize it as a "secondary" subject of the constitutionalization of criminal law. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
刑法的宪法化:法律程序客体与主体的界定问题
刑法的宪法化是一个复杂的、多层次的过程,它将宪法思想和价值观转化为刑法并付诸实践。这是一个受控制和指导的过程,从其结构和功能分析的角度来看,这一过程预设了一个明确的影响对象和宪政主体的存在。刑法构成的主体性特征在分支科学中尚未得到研究。在本文中,作者在需求结构和功能分析的框架内应用系统的方法解决了这一紧迫的问题。本文将刑法的宪法化理解为刑法规制实践中宪法原则和标准的实质性具体化过程。然而,从刑法规制是法律及其适用实践的有机统一这一事实出发,作者认为,刑法实践现象本身作为刑法宪法化对象的一个要素,应加以限制,将其排除在实践的体制和程序特征之外,只将其结果以内容的形式留下。议会制定并由法院在特定案件中适用的刑法规范的解释和含义。由此得出结论:刑法的宪法化对象正是法律渊源所表达的刑法规范,并在执法过程中给予特定的解释。在分析刑法宪法化的主体时,科学界普遍认为这是对俄罗斯宪法法院的唯一批判性评估。事实证明,除了宪法之外,宪法化的主体还包括:议会和具有一般管辖权的法院。这就有可能对宪法化的主体进行分类,这取决于它们与刑事法规相联系的时刻,以确保其合宪性。宪法化的“初级”主体(议会和具有一般管辖权的法院)进行透视宪法化,用宪法原则和规范规范公共关系,创造和适用刑法规范。俄罗斯联邦宪法法院有权通过宪法司法对已经宣布的法律事项进行追溯性的宪法化,从而有可能将其视为刑法宪法化的“次要”主题。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信