Living Archives, Living Story: Questions of Ethics, Responsibility, and Sharing

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Beth Yahp
{"title":"Living Archives, Living Story: Questions of Ethics, Responsibility, and Sharing","authors":"Beth Yahp","doi":"10.1080/08989575.2022.2154449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I would like to think through an uncomfortable moment in my experience of life-writing pedagogy and its aftermath. This moment was inflected by my own practice as a life writer, highlighting for me the pressures and desires that attend teaching life writing or sharing aspects of another’s story. I discuss visualization as a writing technique and describe facilitating life writing in a community space, outside of state or educational institutions, where such institutions are often perceived and experienced as predatory, and I revisit the importance of protocols to ensure participants’ safety, including gatekeeping of the material produced. I consider an alternative view by a participant about sharing her stories. In 2019, I was part of a collaborative project with Malaysia Design Archive, consisting of workshops that guided participants through visual analysis, the exploration of non-state and activist archives, the politics of knowledge production, and narrative-making using personal objects.1 Inspired by an earlier Malaysia Design Archive project, “Living Library: Stories of Strength and Resistance,”2 we proposed “Living Archives” as a way to re-imagine archives and archival practices with Malaysian activists, artists, curators, and researchers, many from minority communities. Interaction with personal objects (beads, pamphlets, family photographs, a feathered headdress) over two and a half days of intensive workshops encouraged the participants to explore what an archive could be (physical, embodied, or ephemeral), who gets to narrate an archive, and to imagine the alternative lives of objects or imaginary archives.3 In Malaysia, censorship of alternative narratives and interpretations of both contemporary and historical or archival material is used to control tightly an authoritarian-capitalist-religious narrative of nation.4 Our project aligned with Malaysia Design Archive’s mission as an independent community archive and site of “digital undercommons” that seeks to document Malaysia’s design history and foster an ethos of research and history from below.5 Situated in the creative enclave of the Zhongshan https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2154449","PeriodicalId":37895,"journal":{"name":"a/b: Auto/Biography Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"487 - 494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"a/b: Auto/Biography Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2154449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay I would like to think through an uncomfortable moment in my experience of life-writing pedagogy and its aftermath. This moment was inflected by my own practice as a life writer, highlighting for me the pressures and desires that attend teaching life writing or sharing aspects of another’s story. I discuss visualization as a writing technique and describe facilitating life writing in a community space, outside of state or educational institutions, where such institutions are often perceived and experienced as predatory, and I revisit the importance of protocols to ensure participants’ safety, including gatekeeping of the material produced. I consider an alternative view by a participant about sharing her stories. In 2019, I was part of a collaborative project with Malaysia Design Archive, consisting of workshops that guided participants through visual analysis, the exploration of non-state and activist archives, the politics of knowledge production, and narrative-making using personal objects.1 Inspired by an earlier Malaysia Design Archive project, “Living Library: Stories of Strength and Resistance,”2 we proposed “Living Archives” as a way to re-imagine archives and archival practices with Malaysian activists, artists, curators, and researchers, many from minority communities. Interaction with personal objects (beads, pamphlets, family photographs, a feathered headdress) over two and a half days of intensive workshops encouraged the participants to explore what an archive could be (physical, embodied, or ephemeral), who gets to narrate an archive, and to imagine the alternative lives of objects or imaginary archives.3 In Malaysia, censorship of alternative narratives and interpretations of both contemporary and historical or archival material is used to control tightly an authoritarian-capitalist-religious narrative of nation.4 Our project aligned with Malaysia Design Archive’s mission as an independent community archive and site of “digital undercommons” that seeks to document Malaysia’s design history and foster an ethos of research and history from below.5 Situated in the creative enclave of the Zhongshan https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2154449
活的档案,活的故事:伦理、责任和分享问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
a/b: Auto/Biography Studies
a/b: Auto/Biography Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: a /b: Auto/Biography Studies enjoys an international reputation for publishing the highest level of peer-reviewed scholarship in the fields of autobiography, biography, life narrative, and identity studies. a/b draws from a diverse community of global scholars to publish essays that further the scholarly discourse on historic and contemporary auto/biographical narratives. For over thirty years, the journal has pushed ongoing conversations in the field in new directions and charted an innovative path into interdisciplinary and multimodal narrative analysis. The journal accepts submissions of scholarly essays, review essays, and book reviews of critical and theoretical texts as well as proposals for special issues and essay clusters. Submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to independent, anonymous peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信