Overview and Current News in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

M. A. Ibarra, José Antonio De la Peña Celaya
{"title":"Overview and Current News in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia","authors":"M. A. Ibarra, José Antonio De la Peña Celaya","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.86662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a challenge in patients of any age range. In the elderly patient, this challenge is further complicated by having to take into account the physical, social, psychological, and emotional factors of this age group, which, together with the complex nature of the disease’s biology, give rise to many questions. Although the diagnostic approach of the disease does not differ from that performed in pediatric or young patients, it does in the determination of risk factors and treatment, since many of the determinants of risk have a different value to that assigned in other patients, and, therefore, we cannot apply all available resources in younger patients to facilitate our work. The genetic alterations of ALL are found more frequently in elderly patients, since age is a factor that increases the risk of presenting these alterations. As an example, the prognostic value of the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (t (9:22)) cannot be weighted at the same scale as in pediatric patients. Comorbidities play another important role when it comes to making therapeutic decisions, and there is currently controversy regarding the use of scores designed to determine the physical and physiological status of elderly subjects. Several analyzes have been carried out to define the value and usefulness of these tools in the older patients with ALL; however, work must still be done in this area. The treatment schemes should be adjusted to the needs and specific characteristics of each individual in advanced age. The use of intensive chemotherapy should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team, always considering the benefit of our patients. In the present chapter, the diverse differences in ALL biology will be addressed when compared with those of children and young adults, and with the impact on the different prognostic determinants and their weight at the time of deciding treatment. The need to apply geriatric tools for decision-making and the therapeutic schemes used around the world for elderly people will also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":91314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a challenge in patients of any age range. In the elderly patient, this challenge is further complicated by having to take into account the physical, social, psychological, and emotional factors of this age group, which, together with the complex nature of the disease’s biology, give rise to many questions. Although the diagnostic approach of the disease does not differ from that performed in pediatric or young patients, it does in the determination of risk factors and treatment, since many of the determinants of risk have a different value to that assigned in other patients, and, therefore, we cannot apply all available resources in younger patients to facilitate our work. The genetic alterations of ALL are found more frequently in elderly patients, since age is a factor that increases the risk of presenting these alterations. As an example, the prognostic value of the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (t (9:22)) cannot be weighted at the same scale as in pediatric patients. Comorbidities play another important role when it comes to making therapeutic decisions, and there is currently controversy regarding the use of scores designed to determine the physical and physiological status of elderly subjects. Several analyzes have been carried out to define the value and usefulness of these tools in the older patients with ALL; however, work must still be done in this area. The treatment schemes should be adjusted to the needs and specific characteristics of each individual in advanced age. The use of intensive chemotherapy should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team, always considering the benefit of our patients. In the present chapter, the diverse differences in ALL biology will be addressed when compared with those of children and young adults, and with the impact on the different prognostic determinants and their weight at the time of deciding treatment. The need to apply geriatric tools for decision-making and the therapeutic schemes used around the world for elderly people will also be discussed.
急性淋巴细胞白血病的综述和最新消息
急性淋巴细胞白血病的管理是一个挑战,在任何年龄范围的患者。在老年患者中,由于必须考虑到这一年龄组的身体、社会、心理和情感因素,加上疾病生物学的复杂性,这一挑战变得更加复杂。虽然该疾病的诊断方法与儿科或年轻患者的诊断方法没有区别,但在确定风险因素和治疗方面存在差异,因为许多风险决定因素与其他患者具有不同的价值,因此,我们不能将所有可用资源用于年轻患者以促进我们的工作。ALL的基因改变在老年患者中更为常见,因为年龄是增加出现这些改变的风险的一个因素。例如,费城染色体(t(9:22))存在的预后价值不能以与儿科患者相同的尺度加权。在做出治疗决定时,合并症起着另一个重要作用,目前关于使用评分来确定老年受试者的身体和生理状态存在争议。已经进行了一些分析,以确定这些工具在老年ALL患者中的价值和有用性;然而,在这方面仍有工作要做。治疗方案应根据每个老年人的需要和具体特点进行调整。强化化疗的使用应在多学科团队中讨论,始终考虑到患者的利益。在本章中,当与儿童和年轻人的生物学比较时,将讨论ALL生物学的不同差异,以及对不同预后决定因素的影响及其在决定治疗时的权重。还将讨论将老年学工具用于决策的必要性以及世界各地对老年人使用的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信