Comparison of Ultrasonographic Estimated Fetal Weight at Term with Actual Birth Weight in Punjab

Asadullah ., Z. Haider, Muhammad Athar Shams Rana, Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq, S. Qayyum, Muhammad Amir Bilal, Fatima Binte Mustafa, Ramsha Shahbaz, A. Nawaz, M. Z. Abidin, R. Zafar, Samia Shahid
{"title":"Comparison of Ultrasonographic Estimated Fetal Weight at Term with Actual Birth Weight in Punjab","authors":"Asadullah ., Z. Haider, Muhammad Athar Shams Rana, Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq, S. Qayyum, Muhammad Amir Bilal, Fatima Binte Mustafa, Ramsha Shahbaz, A. Nawaz, M. Z. Abidin, R. Zafar, Samia Shahid","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs2023176190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The fetus is thought to have an inherent growth potential that under normal circumstances, yields a healthy newborn of appropriate size. Knowledge of weight of fetus in intrauterine life is important for the obstetrician to decide the management plan for delivery whether it would be vaginal or cesarean section. Aim: To compare estimated fetal weight on ultrasound at term with actual birth weight in Bahawalnagar Punjab. Methodology: A cross sectional analytical study was conducted at Tahir Medical Complex Haroon Abad district Bahawalnagar. Data of 200 participants were designated done suitable sample method. SPSS version 21.0 was used for data analysis. Results: out of total number of 200 pregnant women, mean±S. D of estimated fetal weight were 3245.8150±17.53151, Mean ±S. D of actual birth weight were 3260.7700±17.80643. Mean±S.D of Biparietal diameter were 9.2325±0.23428. The minimum and maximum values were 8.70 and 9.76 respectively. Two hundred pregnant females were included in this study. Conclusion: This study indicates that estimation of Birth weight clearly has a role in management of labor and delivery in a term pregnancy. Among term singleton cephalic pregnancies studied, fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s formula is comparable to ultrasound estimates for predicting the actual birth weight within 10%. This study also revealed the mean estimated weight through ultrasound were similar to actual weight. Our results indicated the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of birth weight to be considerably significant therefore it is a reliable modality for estimating fetal weight using the Biparietal diameter, femur length and abdominal circumference as compared to actual birth weight. Keywords: Expected Fetal weight, actual fetal weight, Biparietal diameter, abdominal circumferences, femur length.","PeriodicalId":19842,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023176190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The fetus is thought to have an inherent growth potential that under normal circumstances, yields a healthy newborn of appropriate size. Knowledge of weight of fetus in intrauterine life is important for the obstetrician to decide the management plan for delivery whether it would be vaginal or cesarean section. Aim: To compare estimated fetal weight on ultrasound at term with actual birth weight in Bahawalnagar Punjab. Methodology: A cross sectional analytical study was conducted at Tahir Medical Complex Haroon Abad district Bahawalnagar. Data of 200 participants were designated done suitable sample method. SPSS version 21.0 was used for data analysis. Results: out of total number of 200 pregnant women, mean±S. D of estimated fetal weight were 3245.8150±17.53151, Mean ±S. D of actual birth weight were 3260.7700±17.80643. Mean±S.D of Biparietal diameter were 9.2325±0.23428. The minimum and maximum values were 8.70 and 9.76 respectively. Two hundred pregnant females were included in this study. Conclusion: This study indicates that estimation of Birth weight clearly has a role in management of labor and delivery in a term pregnancy. Among term singleton cephalic pregnancies studied, fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s formula is comparable to ultrasound estimates for predicting the actual birth weight within 10%. This study also revealed the mean estimated weight through ultrasound were similar to actual weight. Our results indicated the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of birth weight to be considerably significant therefore it is a reliable modality for estimating fetal weight using the Biparietal diameter, femur length and abdominal circumference as compared to actual birth weight. Keywords: Expected Fetal weight, actual fetal weight, Biparietal diameter, abdominal circumferences, femur length.
旁遮普超声估计胎儿足月体重与实际出生体重的比较
背景:胎儿被认为具有内在的生长潜力,在正常情况下,会产生一个健康的新生儿。了解胎儿在宫内的体重对于产科医生决定阴道或剖宫产的管理计划是很重要的。目的:比较旁遮普巴哈瓦尔纳格尔地区足月超声胎儿体重与实际出生体重。方法:在Bahawalnagar的Haroon Abad区Tahir医疗中心进行了横断面分析研究。选取200名参与者的数据,采用合适的抽样方法。采用SPSS 21.0版本进行数据分析。结果:200例孕妇中,平均±S。估计胎儿体重的D值为3245.8150±17.53151,平均值±S。实际出生体重D = 3260.7700±17.80643。均值±S。双顶骨直径的D值为9.2325±0.23428。最小值为8.70,最大值为9.76。200名怀孕女性参与了这项研究。结论:本研究表明,出生体重的估计在足月妊娠的分娩管理中具有明显的作用。在研究的足月单胎头位妊娠中,使用Hadlock公式估计的胎儿体重与超声估计的预测实际出生体重的准确度在10%以内。该研究还发现,通过超声波估计的平均体重与实际体重相似。我们的结果表明,超声在估计出生体重方面的诊断准确性相当显著,因此它是一种可靠的方法,可以使用双顶骨直径、股骨长度和腹部围来估计胎儿体重,与实际出生体重相比。关键词:预期胎儿体重,实际胎儿体重,双顶骨直径,腹围,股骨长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信