Skin rash in patients treated with neoadjuvant erlotinib (Tarceva) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: Predictor for tumor response and survival?

van Gool Mh, J. Burgers, K. Sikorska, E. Schaake, T. S. Aukema, H. Klomp
{"title":"Skin rash in patients treated with neoadjuvant erlotinib (Tarceva) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: Predictor for tumor response and survival?","authors":"van Gool Mh, J. Burgers, K. Sikorska, E. Schaake, T. S. Aukema, H. Klomp","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2017-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Skin rash during treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has been reported to be predictive for response and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether skin rash during treatment (as a biomarker) in a preoperative setting was related to response and survival. Methods: This study was designed as an open-label phase II trial (also known as M06NEL). Patients received preoperative erlotinib (Tarceva) 150 mg once daily for 3 weeks. Skin toxicity during treatment was analysed in relation to metabolic and histopathological response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In total 59 patients (25 male, 34 female) were eligible for analysis. In 39 patients (66%) skin toxicity occurred. According to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCICTC), Grade 1 toxicity was seen in 15 patients (25%), Grade 2 in 19 patients (32%) and Grade 3 in five patients (8%). None of the patients showed skin toxicity Grade 4 and 5. The median follow up was 74 months. Thirty-six patients (61%) were alive at time of analysis. Twenty-seven patients (46%) showed disease progression during follow up. Hazard ratios (HR) indicated lower risk of death (HR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.29 1.50) and progression (HR = 0.64, 0.30 1.36), although in this small group results were not significant. Skin rash did not adequately predict response. Conclusions: In this neoadjuvant setting with limited treatment time in patients with early stage NSCLC, skin rash was not associated with response and survival and cannot be used as an early biomarker.","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"11 1","pages":"45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2017-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin rash during treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has been reported to be predictive for response and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether skin rash during treatment (as a biomarker) in a preoperative setting was related to response and survival. Methods: This study was designed as an open-label phase II trial (also known as M06NEL). Patients received preoperative erlotinib (Tarceva) 150 mg once daily for 3 weeks. Skin toxicity during treatment was analysed in relation to metabolic and histopathological response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In total 59 patients (25 male, 34 female) were eligible for analysis. In 39 patients (66%) skin toxicity occurred. According to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCICTC), Grade 1 toxicity was seen in 15 patients (25%), Grade 2 in 19 patients (32%) and Grade 3 in five patients (8%). None of the patients showed skin toxicity Grade 4 and 5. The median follow up was 74 months. Thirty-six patients (61%) were alive at time of analysis. Twenty-seven patients (46%) showed disease progression during follow up. Hazard ratios (HR) indicated lower risk of death (HR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.29 1.50) and progression (HR = 0.64, 0.30 1.36), although in this small group results were not significant. Skin rash did not adequately predict response. Conclusions: In this neoadjuvant setting with limited treatment time in patients with early stage NSCLC, skin rash was not associated with response and survival and cannot be used as an early biomarker.
新辅助厄洛替尼(特罗凯)治疗可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的皮疹:肿瘤反应和生存的预测因子?
背景:据报道,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗期间的皮疹可预测晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的反应和生存。本分析的目的是评估术前治疗期间的皮疹(作为一种生物标志物)是否与反应和生存有关。方法:本研究设计为开放标签II期试验(也称为M06NEL)。患者术前接受厄洛替尼(特罗凯)150 mg,每日1次,连续3周。分析治疗期间皮肤毒性与代谢和组织病理反应、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的关系。结果:共有59例患者(男25例,女34例)符合分析条件。39例(66%)患者发生皮肤毒性。根据美国国家癌症研究所共同毒性标准(NCICTC), 15例患者出现1级毒性(25%),19例患者出现2级毒性(32%),5例患者出现3级毒性(8%)。所有患者均未出现4级和5级皮肤毒性。中位随访时间为74个月。36例患者(61%)在分析时存活。27例(46%)患者在随访期间出现疾病进展。风险比(HR)显示死亡风险(HR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.29 1.50)和进展风险(HR = 0.64, 0.30 1.36)较低,尽管在这个小群体中结果不显著。皮疹不能充分预测反应。结论:在这种治疗时间有限的早期NSCLC患者的新辅助设置中,皮疹与反应和生存无关,不能用作早期生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信