No evidence of a major learning slide 14 months into the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark

IF 2.3 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
J. Birkelund, K. Karlson
{"title":"No evidence of a major learning slide 14 months into the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark","authors":"J. Birkelund, K. Karlson","doi":"10.1080/14616696.2022.2129085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We study the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s academic performance in Denmark 14 months into the pandemic using nationwide and exceptionally rich data on reading test scores and family background (N ≈ 200,000 per year). We find no evidence of a major learning loss. While pupils in grade 8 experienced a three percentile points loss in reading performance, pupils in grades 2 and 4 experienced a learning gain of about five percentile points, possibly resulting from school closures being significantly longer among older (22 weeks) than younger children (eight weeks). Importantly and in contrast to pre-registered expectations, we find little evidence of widening learning gaps by family background. Further analyses point to that all of these patterns were already in place a few months into pandemic, suggesting that learning gaps did not widen during subsequent, longer school closures. We also find some indication that boys and low-performing pupils suffered more from school closures than girls and high-performing pupils, but these differences are minor. We discuss which political measures may have been instrumental for overcoming the COVID-19 learning slide in Denmark.","PeriodicalId":47392,"journal":{"name":"European Societies","volume":"19 1","pages":"468 - 488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2022.2129085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s academic performance in Denmark 14 months into the pandemic using nationwide and exceptionally rich data on reading test scores and family background (N ≈ 200,000 per year). We find no evidence of a major learning loss. While pupils in grade 8 experienced a three percentile points loss in reading performance, pupils in grades 2 and 4 experienced a learning gain of about five percentile points, possibly resulting from school closures being significantly longer among older (22 weeks) than younger children (eight weeks). Importantly and in contrast to pre-registered expectations, we find little evidence of widening learning gaps by family background. Further analyses point to that all of these patterns were already in place a few months into pandemic, suggesting that learning gaps did not widen during subsequent, longer school closures. We also find some indication that boys and low-performing pupils suffered more from school closures than girls and high-performing pupils, but these differences are minor. We discuss which political measures may have been instrumental for overcoming the COVID-19 learning slide in Denmark.
没有证据表明丹麦在COVID-19大流行14个月后出现了重大的学习滑坡
我们研究了COVID-19大流行14个月后对丹麦儿童学习成绩的影响,使用了全国范围内非常丰富的阅读测试成绩和家庭背景数据(N≈200,000 /年)。我们没有发现重大学习损失的证据。8年级学生的阅读成绩下降了3个百分点,而2年级和4年级学生的学习成绩提高了约5个百分点,这可能是由于年龄较大的学生(22周)比年龄较小的学生(8周)停课时间明显更长。重要的是,与预先登记的期望相反,我们发现很少有证据表明家庭背景会扩大学习差距。进一步的分析指出,所有这些模式在大流行发生几个月后就已经存在,这表明在随后较长时间的学校关闭期间,学习差距并没有扩大。我们还发现一些迹象表明,男孩和成绩差的学生比女孩和成绩好的学生受到学校关闭的影响更大,但这些差异很小。我们将讨论哪些政治措施可能有助于丹麦克服COVID-19的学习幻灯片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Societies
European Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: European Societies, the flagship journal of the European Sociological Association, aims to promote and share sociological research related to Europe. As a generalist sociology journal, we welcome research from all areas of sociology. However, we have a specific focus on addressing the socio-economic and socio-political challenges faced by European societies, as well as exploring all aspects of European social life and socioculture. Our journal is committed to upholding ethical standards and academic independence. We conduct a rigorous and anonymous review process for all submitted manuscripts. This ensures the quality and integrity of the research we publish. European Societies encourages a plurality of perspectives within the sociology discipline. We embrace a wide range of sociological methods and theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we are open to articles that adopt a historical perspective and engage in comparative research involving Europe as a whole or specific European countries. We also appreciate comparative studies that include societies beyond Europe. In summary, European Societies is dedicated to promoting sociological research with a focus on European societies. We welcome diverse methodological and theoretical approaches, historical perspectives, and comparative studies involving Europe and other societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信