Frac Fluid induced Damage in Tight Sands and Shale Reservoirs

Shuai Li, Bo Cai, Chunming He, Yuebin Gao, Jia Wang, Fei Yan, Yuting Liu, T. Yu, Xiaojun Zhong, N. Cheng, Haoyu Zhang
{"title":"Frac Fluid induced Damage in Tight Sands and Shale Reservoirs","authors":"Shuai Li, Bo Cai, Chunming He, Yuebin Gao, Jia Wang, Fei Yan, Yuting Liu, T. Yu, Xiaojun Zhong, N. Cheng, Haoyu Zhang","doi":"10.2118/208873-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the hydraulic fracturing of tight sands and shale reservoirs, ten thousands cubic meters of frac fluids were pumped into formation, while only 6-30% can be recovered. Frac fluids imbibed into formation matrix via capillary or forced pressure can cause formation damage, and this has been widely concerned.\n In this paper, we firstly reviewed and summarized the main damage mechanisms during the hydraulic fracturing of tight and shale reservoirs, including formation damage induced by fluids invasion, rock-fluids and fluids-fluids incompatibilities, proppants compaction and embedment, clay swelling and fines migration, chemical adsorption and particle dispersion et al. Secondly, we evaluated the formation damage via large-scale rock-block experiment (40cm×10cm×3cm cuboid size). Fluids invasion, water imbibition and flow-back process were carried out at the in-situ pressure condition to simulate the whole procedure of hydraulic fracturing. Liquid recovery and pressure profile obtained via the pressure detecting probes were used as evaluation method. What's more, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods were also used to illustrate the inner mechanism, explain the inside fluids distribution and fluids migration characteristics in different hydraulic fracturing procedure.\n Results showed that after frac fluid invasion, the rock permeability declined by 8-20%, and the hydrocarbon recovery decline by 25-30%, while the rock permeability can recover 3-12% after 24h's well shut-ins. Well shut-ins can increase rock permeability and this improvement is beneficial to hydrocarbon output in the later flow-back process. At the in-situ pressure condition, 4.3% more kerosene can be recovered than just at the spontaneous imbibition condition. Results also shows that invaded frac fluid forms a ‘water block’ and mainly distributes in macropores and mesopores and forms a water-block near fracture face, increasing capillary discontinuity and blocking seepage channels, while imbibition mechanism can reduce near-fracture water-blocks. A balance of displacement pressure and capillary pressure is crucial to the imbibition mechanism when considering in-situ pressure. The re-migration and distribution of the oil-water phase during the well shut-ins can weaken the water damage effect of the fracture wall, increase the relative permeability of the oil phase, and reduce the discontinuity of the capillary.\n Low fluids recovery after hydraulic fracturing would not all do harm to hydrocarbon recovery, sometimes it may help oil and gas extraction. Study of this paper can provide basis for oilfield field engineers to switch oil production choke and flow-back schedule management.","PeriodicalId":10891,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208873-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During the hydraulic fracturing of tight sands and shale reservoirs, ten thousands cubic meters of frac fluids were pumped into formation, while only 6-30% can be recovered. Frac fluids imbibed into formation matrix via capillary or forced pressure can cause formation damage, and this has been widely concerned. In this paper, we firstly reviewed and summarized the main damage mechanisms during the hydraulic fracturing of tight and shale reservoirs, including formation damage induced by fluids invasion, rock-fluids and fluids-fluids incompatibilities, proppants compaction and embedment, clay swelling and fines migration, chemical adsorption and particle dispersion et al. Secondly, we evaluated the formation damage via large-scale rock-block experiment (40cm×10cm×3cm cuboid size). Fluids invasion, water imbibition and flow-back process were carried out at the in-situ pressure condition to simulate the whole procedure of hydraulic fracturing. Liquid recovery and pressure profile obtained via the pressure detecting probes were used as evaluation method. What's more, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods were also used to illustrate the inner mechanism, explain the inside fluids distribution and fluids migration characteristics in different hydraulic fracturing procedure. Results showed that after frac fluid invasion, the rock permeability declined by 8-20%, and the hydrocarbon recovery decline by 25-30%, while the rock permeability can recover 3-12% after 24h's well shut-ins. Well shut-ins can increase rock permeability and this improvement is beneficial to hydrocarbon output in the later flow-back process. At the in-situ pressure condition, 4.3% more kerosene can be recovered than just at the spontaneous imbibition condition. Results also shows that invaded frac fluid forms a ‘water block’ and mainly distributes in macropores and mesopores and forms a water-block near fracture face, increasing capillary discontinuity and blocking seepage channels, while imbibition mechanism can reduce near-fracture water-blocks. A balance of displacement pressure and capillary pressure is crucial to the imbibition mechanism when considering in-situ pressure. The re-migration and distribution of the oil-water phase during the well shut-ins can weaken the water damage effect of the fracture wall, increase the relative permeability of the oil phase, and reduce the discontinuity of the capillary. Low fluids recovery after hydraulic fracturing would not all do harm to hydrocarbon recovery, sometimes it may help oil and gas extraction. Study of this paper can provide basis for oilfield field engineers to switch oil production choke and flow-back schedule management.
致密砂岩和页岩储层压裂液损伤研究
在致密砂岩和页岩储层水力压裂过程中,向地层中泵入数万立方米的压裂液,但采收率仅为6-30%。压裂液通过毛细管或强制压力进入地层基质会造成地层损害,这一问题已引起广泛关注。本文首先对致密页岩储层水力压裂过程中的主要损伤机制进行了综述和总结,包括流体侵入、岩-液-液不相容、支撑剂压实和嵌套、粘土膨胀和细粒运移、化学吸附和颗粒分散等。其次,通过大规模岩块实验(40cm×10cm×3cm长方体尺寸)对地层损害进行评价。在原地压力条件下进行流体侵入、水吸胀和反排过程模拟,模拟水力压裂全过程。以压力检测探头测得的液体回收率和压力曲线作为评价方法。并利用核磁共振(NMR)方法阐明了内部机理,解释了不同水力压裂过程中的内部流体分布和流体运移特征。结果表明,压裂液侵入后,岩石渗透率下降8-20%,油气采收率下降25-30%,而关井24h后岩石渗透率可恢复3-12%。关井可以提高岩石渗透率,有利于后期返排过程中的油气产量。在地压条件下,煤油采收率比自然渗吸条件下提高4.3%。研究结果还表明,侵入的压裂液形成“水块”,主要分布在大孔和中孔中,在裂缝面附近形成水块,增加了毛管不连续,阻塞了渗流通道,而渗吸机制可以减少裂缝附近的水块。当考虑原位压力时,驱替压力和毛管压力的平衡对吸胀机制至关重要。关井期间油水相的再运移和分布可以减弱裂缝壁的水损害效应,提高油相的相对渗透率,减小毛管的不连续。水力压裂后的低流体采收率并不会对油气采收率造成损害,有时可能有助于油气开采。本文的研究可为油田现场工程人员切换采油节流返排计划管理提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信