Index to International Security: Volume 43 (Summer 2018–Spring 2019)

IF 4.8 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Security Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1162/isec_x_00349

D. Jordan, Stephen G. Brooks, Brian Greenhill, Mark L. Haas, Matthew Adam, Adria Lawrence, Nuno P. Monteiro

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bartz, Eric, and Khalid Momand, “Correspondence: Debating the Rule of Law in Afghanistan” [re: Swenson 42:1], 43:1 (Summer 2018), pp. 181–185. Beckley, Michael, “The Power of Nations: Measuring What Matters,” 43:2 (Fall 2018), pp. 7–44. Beckley, Michael, “Correspondence: Will East Asia Balance against Beijing?” [reply to Sharp and Meyers], 43:3 (Winter 2018/19), pp. 194–197. Brands, Hal, see Feaver, Peter D., and Hal Brands. Brooks, Deborah Jordan, Stephen G. Brooks, Brian D. Greenhill, and Mark L. Haas, “The Demographic Transition Theory of War: Why Young Societies Are Conoict Prone and Old Societies Are the Most Peaceful,” 43:3 (Winter 2018/19), pp. 53–95. Brooks, Stephen G., see Brooks, Deborah Jordan, Stephen G. Brooks, Brian D. Greenhill, and Mark L. Haas.

查看原文本刊更多论文

国际安全指数:第43卷(2018年夏季- 2019年春季)

Bartz, Eric, Khalid Momand，“通信:辩论阿富汗的法治”[re: Swenson 42:1]， 43:1(夏季2018)，第181-185页。贝克利，迈克尔，“国家的力量:衡量什么是重要的，”43:2(2018年秋季)，第7-44页。迈克尔·贝克利，《通信:东亚会制衡北京吗?》[回复夏普和迈耶斯]，43:3(冬季2018/19)，第194-197页。布兰兹，哈尔，见菲弗，彼得·D和哈尔·布兰兹。布鲁克斯、黛博拉·乔丹、斯蒂芬·g·布鲁克斯、布莱恩·d·格林希尔、马克·l·哈斯:《战争的人口转型理论:为什么年轻社会容易发生冲突，而年老社会最和平》，第43卷第3期(2018/19冬季)，第53-95页。Stephen G. Brooks，参见Brooks, Deborah Jordan, Stephen G. Brooks, Brian D. Greenhill和Mark L. Haas。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Security Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Security publishes lucid, well-documented essays on the full range of contemporary security issues. Its articles address traditional topics of war and peace, as well as more recent dimensions of security, including environmental, demographic, and humanitarian issues, transnational networks, and emerging technologies. International Security has defined the debate on US national security policy and set the agenda for scholarship on international security affairs for more than forty years. The journal values scholarship that challenges the conventional wisdom, examines policy, engages theory, illuminates history, and discovers new trends. Readers of IS discover new developments in: The causes and prevention of war U.S.-China relations Great power politics Ethnic conflict and intra-state war Terrorism and insurgency Regional security in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America U.S. foreign and defense policy International relations theory Diplomatic and military history Cybersecurity and defense technology Political economy, business, and security Nuclear proliferation.