Evaluation of prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases

K. Pawełczyk, M. Marciniak, Piotr Błasiak, A. Rzechonek
{"title":"Evaluation of prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases","authors":"K. Pawełczyk, M. Marciniak, Piotr Błasiak, A. Rzechonek","doi":"10.5114/wo.2015.56007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study The resection of pulmonary metastases is a routine practice of thoracic surgery wards; however, clear protocols or prognostic factors defining the surgical treatment criteria are still not available. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in a group of patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases. Material and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a group of 250 patients admitted to the Wrocław Thoracic Surgery Centre for radical resection of pulmonary lesions in the years 1996–2010. Results The patients included in the study (n = 250) underwent 339 thoracotomies in total. The overall five-year survival was 52.8%. The univariate data analysis showed that the survival rate was significantly better in patients subjected to more than one thoracotomy (p = 0.01674). Among the other data, such as sex, tumour histology, disease-free interval (DFI) ≤ 12 and > 12 months, DFI ≤ 36 and > 36 months, age, number of tumours identified in CT and number of tumours subject to resection, operated side, resection type, radicality of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy, no statistical significance was observed in univariate and multivariate analysis (p > 0.05). Conclusions Outcomes of re-metastasectomy are satisfactory if patients meet the baseline criteria for surgical treatment. None of the evaluated factors potentially influencing the patient survival was demonstrated to have any prognostic value. Further research, including the biology of tumours with pulmonary metastases, is necessary to select the group of patients that will benefit most from surgical treatment.","PeriodicalId":10652,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Oncology","volume":"2 1","pages":"378 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2015.56007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim of the study The resection of pulmonary metastases is a routine practice of thoracic surgery wards; however, clear protocols or prognostic factors defining the surgical treatment criteria are still not available. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in a group of patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases. Material and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a group of 250 patients admitted to the Wrocław Thoracic Surgery Centre for radical resection of pulmonary lesions in the years 1996–2010. Results The patients included in the study (n = 250) underwent 339 thoracotomies in total. The overall five-year survival was 52.8%. The univariate data analysis showed that the survival rate was significantly better in patients subjected to more than one thoracotomy (p = 0.01674). Among the other data, such as sex, tumour histology, disease-free interval (DFI) ≤ 12 and > 12 months, DFI ≤ 36 and > 36 months, age, number of tumours identified in CT and number of tumours subject to resection, operated side, resection type, radicality of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy, no statistical significance was observed in univariate and multivariate analysis (p > 0.05). Conclusions Outcomes of re-metastasectomy are satisfactory if patients meet the baseline criteria for surgical treatment. None of the evaluated factors potentially influencing the patient survival was demonstrated to have any prognostic value. Further research, including the biology of tumours with pulmonary metastases, is necessary to select the group of patients that will benefit most from surgical treatment.
肺转移瘤手术治疗的预后因素评价
研究目的肺转移瘤切除术是胸外科病房的常规做法;然而,明确的方案或预后因素定义的手术治疗标准仍然是不可用的。本研究的目的是评估一组接受肺转移灶切除术的患者的预后因素与长期生存的关系。材料与方法回顾性分析1996-2010年在Wrocław胸外科中心行根治性肺病变切除术的250例患者。结果纳入研究的250例患者共行339例开胸手术。总体5年生存率为52.8%。单因素数据分析显示,多次开胸患者的生存率显著提高(p = 0.01674)。其他性别、肿瘤组织学、无病间期(DFI)≤12个月和> 12个月、DFI≤36个月和> 36个月、年龄、CT发现肿瘤数和待切除肿瘤数、手术侧、切除类型、切除根治性、淋巴结切除程度、辅助治疗等资料,单因素和多因素分析差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论满足手术治疗基线标准的患者,再转移切除术的结果是满意的。所有评估的潜在影响患者生存的因素均未被证明具有任何预后价值。进一步的研究,包括肺转移肿瘤的生物学,对于选择从手术治疗中获益最多的患者群体是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信