The Origins of a Capital Market Union in the United States

Jeffrey N. Gordon, Kathryn Judge
{"title":"The Origins of a Capital Market Union in the United States","authors":"Jeffrey N. Gordon, Kathryn Judge","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/11080.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EU policy-makers have focused on the creation of a “Capital Market Union” to advance the economic vitality of the EU in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-09 and the Eurozone crisis of 2011-13. The hope is that EU-wide capital markets will help remedy the limitations in the EU’s pattern of bank-centered finance, which, despite the launch of the Banking Union, remains tied to Member States. Capital market development will provide alternative channels for finance, which will facilitate greater resiliency, more economic integration within the EU, and more choices for savers and firms. This chapter uses the origins of the US capital market union to explore how law can advance the creation of a CMU. The chapter shows the importance of expanding the focal lens beyond investor protection to reveal the full array of ways that the legal choices of repression, substitution, and facilitation shape the private funding of economic activity. \nCentral to the US story was a mismatch between growing enterprises and a stunted banking system. Political choices led to a banking system populated primarily by small local banks that were ill suited to provide financing in the amounts, or with the risk, needed to fund the railroads and the follow-on industrial film expansion. The bond market stepped in, creating national and international channels for debt and then equity finance. Depression-era legal enactments strengthened these markets, through a strong disclosure regime, a powerful market regulator and enforcer (the SEC), and, through the separation of commercial and investment banking (“Glass-Steagall”), the creation of a set of private actors, investment banks, with strong incentives to develop ever more robust capital markets. These developments also helped deter states from interfering excessively in the issuance of debt or equity securities, a core challenge for any capital market union. \nIn arguing for a richer understanding of “financial structure law,” the chapter makes some EU-specific suggestions. These focus on facilitating the growth of EU-wide asset managers, which can engage in credit intermediation similar to banks but with lower systemic risk. In marshalling individuals’ retirement savings, the asset managers can provide a funding supply side to CMU.","PeriodicalId":10000,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11080.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

EU policy-makers have focused on the creation of a “Capital Market Union” to advance the economic vitality of the EU in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-09 and the Eurozone crisis of 2011-13. The hope is that EU-wide capital markets will help remedy the limitations in the EU’s pattern of bank-centered finance, which, despite the launch of the Banking Union, remains tied to Member States. Capital market development will provide alternative channels for finance, which will facilitate greater resiliency, more economic integration within the EU, and more choices for savers and firms. This chapter uses the origins of the US capital market union to explore how law can advance the creation of a CMU. The chapter shows the importance of expanding the focal lens beyond investor protection to reveal the full array of ways that the legal choices of repression, substitution, and facilitation shape the private funding of economic activity. Central to the US story was a mismatch between growing enterprises and a stunted banking system. Political choices led to a banking system populated primarily by small local banks that were ill suited to provide financing in the amounts, or with the risk, needed to fund the railroads and the follow-on industrial film expansion. The bond market stepped in, creating national and international channels for debt and then equity finance. Depression-era legal enactments strengthened these markets, through a strong disclosure regime, a powerful market regulator and enforcer (the SEC), and, through the separation of commercial and investment banking (“Glass-Steagall”), the creation of a set of private actors, investment banks, with strong incentives to develop ever more robust capital markets. These developments also helped deter states from interfering excessively in the issuance of debt or equity securities, a core challenge for any capital market union. In arguing for a richer understanding of “financial structure law,” the chapter makes some EU-specific suggestions. These focus on facilitating the growth of EU-wide asset managers, which can engage in credit intermediation similar to banks but with lower systemic risk. In marshalling individuals’ retirement savings, the asset managers can provide a funding supply side to CMU.
美国资本市场联盟的起源
在2007-09年全球金融危机和2011-13年欧元区危机之后,欧盟政策制定者一直致力于创建“资本市场联盟”,以提升欧盟的经济活力。希望在于,欧盟范围内的资本市场将有助于弥补欧盟以银行为中心的金融模式的局限性。尽管推出了银行业联盟,但这种模式仍与成员国联系在一起。资本市场的发展将为融资提供替代渠道,这将促进更大的弹性,促进欧盟内部的经济一体化,并为储户和企业提供更多选择。本章从美国资本市场联盟的起源出发,探讨法律如何推动资本市场联盟的建立。本章展示了将焦点镜头扩展到投资者保护之外的重要性,以揭示压制,替代和促进的法律选择塑造经济活动私人资金的各种方式。美国故事的核心是成长型企业与发育不良的银行体系之间的不匹配。政治选择导致银行体系主要由小型地方银行组成,这些银行不适合为铁路和随后的工业胶片扩张提供所需的资金,也不适合承担风险。债券市场介入,为债务和股权融资创造了国内和国际渠道。大萧条时期颁布的法律加强了这些市场,通过强有力的信息披露制度,强有力的市场监管和执行者(美国证券交易委员会),以及通过将商业银行和投资银行分离(“格拉斯-斯蒂格尔法案”),创造了一系列私人行为者,投资银行,它们有强烈的动机发展更强大的资本市场。这些进展还有助于阻止各国过度干预债务或股票证券的发行,这是任何资本市场联盟面临的核心挑战。为了更好地理解“金融结构法”,本章提出了一些针对欧盟的建议。这些措施的重点是促进欧盟范围内资产管理公司的发展,这些公司可以从事与银行类似的信贷中介,但系统性风险较低。在整理个人退休储蓄方面,资产管理公司可以为CMU提供资金供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信