The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall.

H. Roediger
{"title":"The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall.","authors":"H. Roediger","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"150 undergraduates were given instructions in using 1 of 4 mnemonic techniques: imagery, the link method, a peg system, or the method of loci. Relative to controls, all mnemonic groups showed an advantage in memorizing 20-word lists for unordered recall. However, the greatest differences appeared when recall was scored by a strict positional criterion whereby Ss received credit for recalling a word only when it was placed in its correct position. By this scoring method, peg and loci Ss performed best on an immediate test, and imagery and control Ss, worst. Performance of Ss told to use linking images was intermediate. Mnemonic devices have greater effects on the ordering of recall than on the number of words that can be recalled without regard to order. Some experimental failures to show that mnemonic devices are effective may have been due to testing only item information. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":76919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory","volume":"15 1","pages":"558-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"130","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 130

Abstract

150 undergraduates were given instructions in using 1 of 4 mnemonic techniques: imagery, the link method, a peg system, or the method of loci. Relative to controls, all mnemonic groups showed an advantage in memorizing 20-word lists for unordered recall. However, the greatest differences appeared when recall was scored by a strict positional criterion whereby Ss received credit for recalling a word only when it was placed in its correct position. By this scoring method, peg and loci Ss performed best on an immediate test, and imagery and control Ss, worst. Performance of Ss told to use linking images was intermediate. Mnemonic devices have greater effects on the ordering of recall than on the number of words that can be recalled without regard to order. Some experimental failures to show that mnemonic devices are effective may have been due to testing only item information. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
四种助记法在排序记忆中的有效性。
150名本科生被指导使用四种助记技术中的一种:意象法、链接法、peg系统或位点法。与对照组相比,所有助记组在记忆20个单词的无序记忆方面都表现出优势。然而,当按照严格的位置标准对记忆进行评分时,最大的差异出现了,即只有当一个单词被放在正确的位置时,学生才能记住它。通过这种评分方法,peg和位点s在即时测试中表现最好,而意象和对照s表现最差。被告知使用链接图像的学生表现一般。记忆工具对记忆顺序的影响要大于对不考虑顺序而能记住的单词数量的影响。一些实验未能证明助记装置是有效的,可能是由于只测试了项目信息。(24 ref) (PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2006 APA,版权所有)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书