Specters of Goffman: Impression Management in the Irish Welfare Space

Q3 Social Sciences
Joe Whelan
{"title":"Specters of Goffman: Impression Management in the Irish Welfare Space","authors":"Joe Whelan","doi":"10.1177/1936724420983578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Goffmanian thesis of stigma occurring as an aspect of “spoiled identity” has arguably provided the dominant theoretical understanding of social stigma over the past half century. Yet, there have also been strong critiques of Goffman’s thesis of stigma which range from concerns with the micro-personal nature of his work to question marks over the corpus of materials used by Goffman when originally theorizing stigma. Recent scholarly contributions have theorized a more structural understanding of the role and function of stigma and this, in turn, has arguably forced the question of whether or not Goffman’s thesis of stigma has now become redundant in terms of its application in the social sciences. This paper intends to explore this question by offering a juxtaposition of the theoretical and the empirical. To meet this task, the paper first engages in a theoretical discussion of the Goffmanian thesis of social stigma. Crucially, however, original research, conducted in Ireland, is also presented. This empirical material shows that, despite the very valid concerns with Goffman’s theory of stigma, much of his analysis with respect to impression management is borne out in lived experience. In doing so, aspects of the Goffmanian thesis of impression management as a response to the potential for stigma are affirmed thus demonstrating the continuing applicability of this theoretical strand. New understandings of impression management are also advanced.","PeriodicalId":39829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"47 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724420983578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The Goffmanian thesis of stigma occurring as an aspect of “spoiled identity” has arguably provided the dominant theoretical understanding of social stigma over the past half century. Yet, there have also been strong critiques of Goffman’s thesis of stigma which range from concerns with the micro-personal nature of his work to question marks over the corpus of materials used by Goffman when originally theorizing stigma. Recent scholarly contributions have theorized a more structural understanding of the role and function of stigma and this, in turn, has arguably forced the question of whether or not Goffman’s thesis of stigma has now become redundant in terms of its application in the social sciences. This paper intends to explore this question by offering a juxtaposition of the theoretical and the empirical. To meet this task, the paper first engages in a theoretical discussion of the Goffmanian thesis of social stigma. Crucially, however, original research, conducted in Ireland, is also presented. This empirical material shows that, despite the very valid concerns with Goffman’s theory of stigma, much of his analysis with respect to impression management is borne out in lived experience. In doing so, aspects of the Goffmanian thesis of impression management as a response to the potential for stigma are affirmed thus demonstrating the continuing applicability of this theoretical strand. New understandings of impression management are also advanced.
高夫曼的幽灵:爱尔兰福利空间的印象管理
戈夫曼关于耻辱作为“被宠坏的身份”的一个方面出现的论点,可以说在过去半个世纪中为社会耻辱提供了主导的理论理解。然而,对戈夫曼的病耻感理论也有强烈的批评,从对他的工作的微观个人性质的关注到对戈夫曼最初理论化病耻感时使用的材料语料的质疑。最近的学术贡献理论化了对耻辱感的作用和功能的更结构性的理解,这反过来又有争议地提出了一个问题,即戈夫曼的耻辱感理论在社会科学中的应用是否已经变得多余了。本文试图通过理论和实证的并置来探讨这个问题。为了完成这一任务,本文首先对社会耻辱的戈夫曼理论进行了理论讨论。然而,至关重要的是,在爱尔兰进行的原始研究也被提出。这一实证材料表明,尽管戈夫曼的耻辱感理论非常有效,但他关于印象管理的许多分析都是在生活经验中得到证实的。在这样做的过程中,戈夫曼的印象管理理论的各个方面作为对污名化的潜在反应得到了肯定,从而证明了这一理论链的持续适用性。对印象管理的新理解也被提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Social Science
Journal of Applied Social Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Social Science publishes research articles, essays, research reports, teaching notes, and book reviews on a wide range of topics of interest to the social science practitioner. Specifically, we encourage submission of manuscripts that, in a concrete way, apply social science or critically reflect on the application of social science. Authors must address how they either improved a social condition or propose to do so, based on social science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信