Meister Eckhart Reading Ibn Gabirol’s Fons vitae

Ze’ev Strauss, Eckhart Reading Ibn Gabirol’s, Fons vitae
{"title":"Meister Eckhart Reading Ibn Gabirol’s Fons vitae","authors":"Ze’ev Strauss, Eckhart Reading Ibn Gabirol’s, Fons vitae","doi":"10.1515/9783110618839-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The High Scholastic German Dominican Meister Eckhart (1260–1328) is renowned for his innovative philosophy that dared to break the mould of the accepted Scholastic worldview of his days.2 Some of the heterodox elements of his thought also seem to have originated from his favourable view of Jewish philosophical sources. The celebrated Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135/38–1204) immediately comes to mind since his Judaeo-Arabic Aristotelianism exerted a formative impact on Eckhart.3 However, Maimonides is not the only Jewish philosopher to have shaped Eckhart’s body of thought. A further philosophical source requiring scholarly attention is Fons vitae by the eleventh-century Jewish Andalusian Solomon Ibn Gabirol (1020/21–58), generally denoted in Scholasticism as Avicebron or as Avencebrol. Eckhart, who was not aware of Avicebron’s Jewish faith, approvingly invokes his philosophical authority on several occasions. His treatment of Fons vitae’s metaphysical assertions represents a constructive way of approaching Gabirolean thought which deviates from his Dominican predecessors, the ardent Aristotelians Albertus Magnus (c. 1200– 80) and Thomas Aquinas (1225–74). These two thirteenth-century Scholastics are rather notorious for their critical attitude towards Avicebronian hylomorphism.4","PeriodicalId":93772,"journal":{"name":"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The High Scholastic German Dominican Meister Eckhart (1260–1328) is renowned for his innovative philosophy that dared to break the mould of the accepted Scholastic worldview of his days.2 Some of the heterodox elements of his thought also seem to have originated from his favourable view of Jewish philosophical sources. The celebrated Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135/38–1204) immediately comes to mind since his Judaeo-Arabic Aristotelianism exerted a formative impact on Eckhart.3 However, Maimonides is not the only Jewish philosopher to have shaped Eckhart’s body of thought. A further philosophical source requiring scholarly attention is Fons vitae by the eleventh-century Jewish Andalusian Solomon Ibn Gabirol (1020/21–58), generally denoted in Scholasticism as Avicebron or as Avencebrol. Eckhart, who was not aware of Avicebron’s Jewish faith, approvingly invokes his philosophical authority on several occasions. His treatment of Fons vitae’s metaphysical assertions represents a constructive way of approaching Gabirolean thought which deviates from his Dominican predecessors, the ardent Aristotelians Albertus Magnus (c. 1200– 80) and Thomas Aquinas (1225–74). These two thirteenth-century Scholastics are rather notorious for their critical attitude towards Avicebronian hylomorphism.4
埃克哈特先生正在阅读伊本·加比罗尔的自传
高等学院派德裔多米尼加人埃克哈特(1260-1328)以其敢于打破当时公认的学院派世界观的创新哲学而闻名他思想中的一些非正统元素似乎也源于他对犹太哲学来源的有利看法。我立刻想到了著名的犹太哲学家迈蒙尼德(1135/38-1204),因为他的犹太-阿拉伯亚里士多德主义对埃克哈特产生了形成性的影响。然而,迈蒙尼德并不是唯一一个影响埃克哈特思想体系的犹太哲学家。另一个需要学术关注的哲学来源是11世纪安达卢西亚犹太人所罗门·伊本·加比罗尔(1020/21-58)的《生命之书》,在经院哲学中通常被称为Avicebron或Avencebrol。埃克哈特并不知道阿维伯伦的犹太信仰,他在几个场合赞许地援引了他的哲学权威。他对Fons vitae的形而上学断言的处理代表了一种建设性的接近Gabirolean思想的方式,偏离了他的多米尼加前辈,热心的亚里士多德主义者Albertus Magnus(约1200 - 80)和Thomas Aquinas(1225-74)。这两位13世纪的经院哲学家因其对阿维塞布罗尼式词形学的批判态度而臭名昭著
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信