Shifting the Mythic Discourse: Ambiguity and Destabilization in Joanne Kyger’s The Tapestry and the Web

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Estíbaliz Encarnación-Pinedo
{"title":"Shifting the Mythic Discourse: Ambiguity and Destabilization in Joanne Kyger’s The Tapestry and the Web","authors":"Estíbaliz Encarnación-Pinedo","doi":"10.5209/amal.66717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Homeric Penelope, long hailed as a feminist icon just as much as an example of submissive wife, has been the focus of numerous revisions and interpretations ranging from the reactionary to the most subversive. This article analyzes Joanne Kyger’s revision of the mythic discourse in The Tapestry and the Web (1965) by studying two of the main strategies used by the poet: subtle shifts of focus and the use of alternative sources. Building from Joseph Campbell’s concept of the monomyth, which gave the poet the aesthetic freedom to move within Homer’s text, the article examines Kyger’s use of the mythic discourse to undermine the prevalence of patriarchal narratives and question their position as established categories. Operating inside and outside the Homeric construct, Kyger’s collection perpetuates and subverts the classical myth in a move that anticipates contemporary – feminist – revisions and adaptations.  ","PeriodicalId":40412,"journal":{"name":"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/amal.66717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Homeric Penelope, long hailed as a feminist icon just as much as an example of submissive wife, has been the focus of numerous revisions and interpretations ranging from the reactionary to the most subversive. This article analyzes Joanne Kyger’s revision of the mythic discourse in The Tapestry and the Web (1965) by studying two of the main strategies used by the poet: subtle shifts of focus and the use of alternative sources. Building from Joseph Campbell’s concept of the monomyth, which gave the poet the aesthetic freedom to move within Homer’s text, the article examines Kyger’s use of the mythic discourse to undermine the prevalence of patriarchal narratives and question their position as established categories. Operating inside and outside the Homeric construct, Kyger’s collection perpetuates and subverts the classical myth in a move that anticipates contemporary – feminist – revisions and adaptations.  
转移神话话语:乔安妮·凯格《挂毯与网络》中的模糊性与不稳定性
荷马式的佩内洛普(Penelope),长期以来被誉为女权主义的象征,也是顺从妻子的典范,一直是无数次修订和解释的焦点,从反动到最具颠覆性。本文分析了乔安妮·凯格在《织锦与网络》(the Tapestry and the Web, 1965)中对神话话语的修改,研究了诗人使用的两种主要策略:微妙的焦点转移和替代来源的使用。约瑟夫·坎贝尔(Joseph Campbell)提出的单神话(monomyth)概念赋予了诗人在荷马文本中移动的审美自由,本文从这个概念出发,考察了凯格(Kyger)对神话话语的使用,以削弱父权叙事的盛行,并质疑其作为既定类别的地位。在荷马式结构内外运作,Kyger的合集延续并颠覆了古典神话,这一举动预示着当代女权主义的修订和改编。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica
Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 2008 by José Manuel Losada, Amaltea (ISSN-e 1989-1709) is a journal of myth criticism with intimate connections to Asteria, the International Association of Myth Criticism, and the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Its object of study is the way ancient, medieval and modern myths are perceived and adapted in literature and the arts from 1900 to the present day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信