Rome-sacking and barebacking: longing, rhetoric, and revolution in Augustine and queer theory

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
C. Aldridge
{"title":"Rome-sacking and barebacking: longing, rhetoric, and revolution in Augustine and queer theory","authors":"C. Aldridge","doi":"10.1080/13558358.2020.1854039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Augustine’s sermon on ‘The Sacking of the City of Rome’ appears to lack the pastoral rhetoric that readers of his Confessions are so familiar with. This paper recovers the pastoral dimension of Augustine’s discourse by reading it alongside recent reinterpretations of barebacking subculture in queer theory. Maia Kotrosits argues that the rhetorical turn in the categorization of HIV/AIDS produced senses of asynchrony, and that barebacking responds to these by rooting the individual in an irreversible timeline of HIV-positivity. Barebacking can therefore be read as ‘pastoral’ rhetoric that resolves the agony of uncertainty. Augustine’s sermon is pastoral in this sense; Augustine imposes an historical ending that resolves the temporal anxiety he and his contemporaries felt after the sack of Rome in 410. Nevertheless, writing an ending – pastoral as that may be – can be a violent process if it negates or replaces the revolutionary work of making history.","PeriodicalId":42039,"journal":{"name":"Theology & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2020.1854039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Augustine’s sermon on ‘The Sacking of the City of Rome’ appears to lack the pastoral rhetoric that readers of his Confessions are so familiar with. This paper recovers the pastoral dimension of Augustine’s discourse by reading it alongside recent reinterpretations of barebacking subculture in queer theory. Maia Kotrosits argues that the rhetorical turn in the categorization of HIV/AIDS produced senses of asynchrony, and that barebacking responds to these by rooting the individual in an irreversible timeline of HIV-positivity. Barebacking can therefore be read as ‘pastoral’ rhetoric that resolves the agony of uncertainty. Augustine’s sermon is pastoral in this sense; Augustine imposes an historical ending that resolves the temporal anxiety he and his contemporaries felt after the sack of Rome in 410. Nevertheless, writing an ending – pastoral as that may be – can be a violent process if it negates or replaces the revolutionary work of making history.
洗劫罗马与光着马背:奥古斯丁与酷儿理论中的渴望、修辞与革命
奥古斯丁关于“洗劫罗马城”的布道似乎缺乏读者所熟悉的田园修辞。本文通过阅读奥古斯丁的话语以及最近在酷儿理论中对光背亚文化的重新解释,恢复了奥古斯丁话语的田园维度。Maia Kotrosits认为,HIV/AIDS分类的修辞转变产生了一种不同步的感觉,裸背通过将个人根植于HIV阳性的不可逆转的时间线来回应这些感觉。因此,光背可以被解读为解决不确定性带来的痛苦的“田园”修辞。奥古斯丁的布道在这个意义上是牧灵的;奥古斯丁强加了一个历史的结局,解决了他和他的同时代人在410年罗马被洗劫后感受到的时间焦虑。然而,写一个结局——可能是牧歌式的——如果它否定或取代创造历史的革命工作,可能是一个暴力的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信