Improving wrist imaging through a multicentre educational intervention: The challenge of orthogonal projections

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
B. Snaith, S. Raine, L. Fowler, C. Osborne, Sophie House, Ryan Holmes, E. Tattersall, Emma Pierce, M. Dobson, J. Harcus
{"title":"Improving wrist imaging through a multicentre educational intervention: The challenge of orthogonal projections","authors":"B. Snaith, S. Raine, L. Fowler, C. Osborne, Sophie House, Ryan Holmes, E. Tattersall, Emma Pierce, M. Dobson, J. Harcus","doi":"10.1177/1758998320935920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In relation to wrist imaging, the accepted requirement is two orthogonal projections obtained at 90°, each with the wrist in neutral position. However, the literature and anecdotal experience suggests that this principle is not universally applied. Method This multiphase study was undertaken across eight different hospitals sites. Compliance with standard UK technique was confirmed if there was a change in ulna orientation between the dorsi-palmar (DP) and lateral wrist projections. A baseline evaluation for three days was randomly identified from the preceding three months. An educational intervention was implemented using a poster to demonstrate standard positioning. To measure the impact of the intervention, further evaluation took place at two weeks (early) and three months (late). Results Across the study phases, only a minority of radiographs demonstrated compliance with the standard technique, with an identical anatomical appearance of the distal ulna across the projections. Initial compliance was 16.8% (n = 40/238), and this improved to 47.8% (n = 77/161) post-intervention, but declined to 32.8% (n = 41/125) within three months. The presence of pathology appeared to influence practice, with a greater proportion of those with an abnormal radiographic examination demonstrating a change in ulna appearances in the baseline cohort (p < 0.001) and the late post-intervention group (p = 0.002) but not in the examinations performed two weeks after staff education (p = 0.239). Conclusion Assessment of image quality is critical for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Yet poor compliance with standard anatomical principles was evident. A simple educational intervention resulted in a transient improvement in wrist positioning, but the impact was not sustained over time.","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"107 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998320935920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction In relation to wrist imaging, the accepted requirement is two orthogonal projections obtained at 90°, each with the wrist in neutral position. However, the literature and anecdotal experience suggests that this principle is not universally applied. Method This multiphase study was undertaken across eight different hospitals sites. Compliance with standard UK technique was confirmed if there was a change in ulna orientation between the dorsi-palmar (DP) and lateral wrist projections. A baseline evaluation for three days was randomly identified from the preceding three months. An educational intervention was implemented using a poster to demonstrate standard positioning. To measure the impact of the intervention, further evaluation took place at two weeks (early) and three months (late). Results Across the study phases, only a minority of radiographs demonstrated compliance with the standard technique, with an identical anatomical appearance of the distal ulna across the projections. Initial compliance was 16.8% (n = 40/238), and this improved to 47.8% (n = 77/161) post-intervention, but declined to 32.8% (n = 41/125) within three months. The presence of pathology appeared to influence practice, with a greater proportion of those with an abnormal radiographic examination demonstrating a change in ulna appearances in the baseline cohort (p < 0.001) and the late post-intervention group (p = 0.002) but not in the examinations performed two weeks after staff education (p = 0.239). Conclusion Assessment of image quality is critical for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Yet poor compliance with standard anatomical principles was evident. A simple educational intervention resulted in a transient improvement in wrist positioning, but the impact was not sustained over time.
通过多中心教育干预改善手腕成像:正交投影的挑战
关于手腕成像,公认的要求是在90°处获得两个正交投影,每个手腕处于中立位置。然而,文献和轶事经验表明,这一原则并不普遍适用。方法本研究在8家不同的医院进行。如果尺骨在掌背(DP)和腕部外侧突出之间的方向发生改变,则证实了标准UK技术的依从性。从前三个月随机确定三天的基线评估。使用海报进行教育干预,以展示标准定位。为了衡量干预的影响,在两周(早期)和三个月(后期)进行了进一步的评估。结果在整个研究阶段,只有少数x线片显示符合标准技术,远端尺骨在投影处具有相同的解剖外观。初始依从性为16.8% (n = 40/238),干预后改善至47.8% (n = 77/161),但3个月内下降至32.8% (n = 41/125)。病理的存在似乎影响了实践,在基线队列(p < 0.001)和干预后晚期组(p = 0.002)中,有异常x线检查显示尺骨外观改变的比例更大,但在工作人员教育后两周进行的检查中没有这种情况(p = 0.239)。结论图像质量评价对诊断和治疗监测至关重要。然而,标准解剖原理的不一致性是显而易见的。一个简单的教育干预导致手腕定位的短暂改善,但影响不能持续一段时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信