Fogging Effectiveness Based on Time and Location of DHF Cases (Study in Sleman Regency)

Q4 Medicine
T. Kesetyaningsih, Kusbaryanto Kusbaryanto, B. Sulistyo, N. Listyaningrum, TRI BASKORO T. Satoto
{"title":"Fogging Effectiveness Based on Time and Location of DHF Cases (Study in Sleman Regency)","authors":"T. Kesetyaningsih, Kusbaryanto Kusbaryanto, B. Sulistyo, N. Listyaningrum, TRI BASKORO T. Satoto","doi":"10.15294/kemas.v18i3.39970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dengue fever is a viral infection transmitted through the bite of the Aedes mosquito. Dengue fever is a public health problem worldwide, including in Indonesia. The increase in dengue cases is closely related to the presence of mosquito vectors. The prevention of dengue outbreaks is by fogging focus. Until now, there is no method to evaluate the effectiveness of focal fogging, yet many suspect that fogging focus is less effective because the incidence of DHF tends to increase over several decades. The study aims to find a method to evaluate the effectiveness of fogging with a spatial-temporal approach. It is an observational study using data on the incidence of DHF along with the date of illness, coordinates of DHF patients, and the date of fogging obtained from the District Health Office. Data processing is by ArcMap 10.5. Determination of the time limit and extent of protective fogging is based on the provision that if in the buffer area within a radius of 200 meters, there is more than one case of DHF on days 4-21 after the patient has a fever, then fogging is declared ineffective. There were 1,070 cases of DHF in 2008-2013 in Sleman Regency. 773 (72.24%) cases were fogged, while 290 were not. Of the 773 fogged cases, 59 (7.63%) were within the time and place of fogging protection. It means that the effectiveness of fogging in Sleman Regency reached 92.37%. Overall, there were 59 of 1,070 (5.5%) DHF cases came from ineffective fogging. By spatio-temporal approach, the fogging focus has been quite successful in suppressing the incidence of DHF in the Sleman Regency. In the future, it is necessary to consider fogging is focused other than in the patient’s house and surroundings.","PeriodicalId":30682,"journal":{"name":"KEMAS Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEMAS Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v18i3.39970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dengue fever is a viral infection transmitted through the bite of the Aedes mosquito. Dengue fever is a public health problem worldwide, including in Indonesia. The increase in dengue cases is closely related to the presence of mosquito vectors. The prevention of dengue outbreaks is by fogging focus. Until now, there is no method to evaluate the effectiveness of focal fogging, yet many suspect that fogging focus is less effective because the incidence of DHF tends to increase over several decades. The study aims to find a method to evaluate the effectiveness of fogging with a spatial-temporal approach. It is an observational study using data on the incidence of DHF along with the date of illness, coordinates of DHF patients, and the date of fogging obtained from the District Health Office. Data processing is by ArcMap 10.5. Determination of the time limit and extent of protective fogging is based on the provision that if in the buffer area within a radius of 200 meters, there is more than one case of DHF on days 4-21 after the patient has a fever, then fogging is declared ineffective. There were 1,070 cases of DHF in 2008-2013 in Sleman Regency. 773 (72.24%) cases were fogged, while 290 were not. Of the 773 fogged cases, 59 (7.63%) were within the time and place of fogging protection. It means that the effectiveness of fogging in Sleman Regency reached 92.37%. Overall, there were 59 of 1,070 (5.5%) DHF cases came from ineffective fogging. By spatio-temporal approach, the fogging focus has been quite successful in suppressing the incidence of DHF in the Sleman Regency. In the future, it is necessary to consider fogging is focused other than in the patient’s house and surroundings.
基于时间和地点的登革出血热病例雾化效果研究(以Sleman县为例)
登革热是一种通过伊蚊叮咬传播的病毒感染。登革热是世界范围内的一个公共卫生问题,包括印度尼西亚。登革热病例的增加与蚊子媒介的存在密切相关。登革热疫情的预防是通过雾化焦点。到目前为止,还没有评估焦点雾化效果的方法,但许多人怀疑焦点雾化效果较差,因为几十年来登革出血热的发病率趋于增加。本研究旨在寻找一种基于时空的方法来评估雾化效果。这是一项观察性研究,使用了从区卫生局获得的登革出血热发病率数据以及发病日期、登革出血热患者座标和雾化日期。数据处理由arcmap10.5完成。防护雾化时限和范围的确定依据如下规定:在患者发热后的第4-21天内,如果在200米半径的缓冲区内出现1例以上的登革出血热病例,则宣布雾化无效。2008-2013年,Sleman县共发生DHF 1070例,雾化773例(72.24%),未雾化290例(290例)。773例雾霾病例中,59例(7.63%)在雾霾防护时间和地点内。这意味着Sleman摄政区的雾化效果达到了92.37%。总体而言,1070例DHF病例中有59例(5.5%)来自无效雾化。通过时空方法,雾化焦点在抑制Sleman摄区DHF发病率方面取得了相当大的成功。在未来,有必要考虑雾化是集中在病人的房子和周围环境以外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信