{"title":"Compassionate Exclusivism: Relational Atonement and Post-Mortem Salvation","authors":"A. Davis","doi":"10.12978/jat.2021-9.000013030018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faithful persons tend to relate to their religious beliefs as truth claims, particularly inasmuch as their beliefs have soteriological implications for those of different religions. For Christians the particular claims which matter most in this regard are those made by Jesus of Nazareth and his claims are primarily relational in nature. I propose a model in which we understand divine grace from Jesus as being mediated through relational knowledge of him on a compassionately exclusivist basis, including post-mortem. Supporting this model, I draw from Eleonore Stump’s hypothesis in her 2018 Atonement that the crucifixion of Jesus opens the divine psyche to all human psyches sufficiently for salvific mutual indwelling to occur, and from Gavin D’Costa’s conception of the descensus Christi ad inferos as the mechanism for grace’s accessibility post-mortem presented in his 2009 Christianity and World Religions. This model seeks to address ongoing, justified pastoral concern for the soteriological status of non-Christians while still treating Christianity as objectively true.","PeriodicalId":14947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytic Theology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytic Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2021-9.000013030018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Faithful persons tend to relate to their religious beliefs as truth claims, particularly inasmuch as their beliefs have soteriological implications for those of different religions. For Christians the particular claims which matter most in this regard are those made by Jesus of Nazareth and his claims are primarily relational in nature. I propose a model in which we understand divine grace from Jesus as being mediated through relational knowledge of him on a compassionately exclusivist basis, including post-mortem. Supporting this model, I draw from Eleonore Stump’s hypothesis in her 2018 Atonement that the crucifixion of Jesus opens the divine psyche to all human psyches sufficiently for salvific mutual indwelling to occur, and from Gavin D’Costa’s conception of the descensus Christi ad inferos as the mechanism for grace’s accessibility post-mortem presented in his 2009 Christianity and World Religions. This model seeks to address ongoing, justified pastoral concern for the soteriological status of non-Christians while still treating Christianity as objectively true.
忠实的人倾向于把他们的宗教信仰作为真理的主张,特别是因为他们的信仰对其他宗教有救赎的含义。对于基督徒来说,在这方面最重要的是拿撒勒人耶稣的主张,他的主张主要是关系性的。我提出了一个模型,在这个模型中,我们理解来自耶稣的神圣恩典是通过对他的关系知识来调解的,这是一种同情的排他性基础,包括死后。为了支持这一模型,我从Eleonore Stump在她2018年的《赎罪》中提出的假设中得出结论,即耶稣被钉在十字架上,向所有人的心灵打开了神圣的心灵,足以使救赎的相互内住发生,以及从Gavin D 'Costa在他2009年的《基督教和世界宗教》中提出的“基督的降世与地狱”的概念中得出结论,即恩典的可及性是死后的机制。这种模式寻求解决持续的、合理的牧师对非基督徒救赎论地位的关注,同时仍然将基督教视为客观真实的。