Asymmetric Dynamics of Rent and Vacancy Rates in the Tokyo Office Market

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Kazushi Matsuo, M. Tsutsumi, T. Imazeki
{"title":"Asymmetric Dynamics of Rent and Vacancy Rates in the Tokyo Office Market","authors":"Kazushi Matsuo, M. Tsutsumi, T. Imazeki","doi":"10.53383/100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, it has been shown that the dynamics of office markets are asymmetric depending on the market conditions and the direction of supply and demand shocks. However, the actual state of asymmetry varies significantly from market to market, and an overview of the discussion is needed. In this study, we test our hypothesis on asymmetric dynamics in the Tokyo office market, one of the world's largest markets. We employ the rent-adjustment process model proposed by Englund et al. (2008), an improved and more realistic version of the error correction model that captures the interaction between rent, vacancy rates, and stock. The data of the Tokyo office market range from January 2000 to September 2015 and cover ten regions. The results reveal that the mechanism of rent and vacancy rate fluctuation depends largely on the direction of change in supply and demand and on market conditions, especially the upward and downward movements of rents. It is also shown that increases in demand and supply not only encourage rents toward equilibrium, but also have the effect of overshooting them. These results can be valuable in properly capturing future shocks in demand and supply.","PeriodicalId":44050,"journal":{"name":"International Real Estate Review","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Real Estate Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53383/100355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, it has been shown that the dynamics of office markets are asymmetric depending on the market conditions and the direction of supply and demand shocks. However, the actual state of asymmetry varies significantly from market to market, and an overview of the discussion is needed. In this study, we test our hypothesis on asymmetric dynamics in the Tokyo office market, one of the world's largest markets. We employ the rent-adjustment process model proposed by Englund et al. (2008), an improved and more realistic version of the error correction model that captures the interaction between rent, vacancy rates, and stock. The data of the Tokyo office market range from January 2000 to September 2015 and cover ten regions. The results reveal that the mechanism of rent and vacancy rate fluctuation depends largely on the direction of change in supply and demand and on market conditions, especially the upward and downward movements of rents. It is also shown that increases in demand and supply not only encourage rents toward equilibrium, but also have the effect of overshooting them. These results can be valuable in properly capturing future shocks in demand and supply.
东京写字楼市场租金和空置率的不对称动态
近年来,研究表明,写字楼市场的动态是不对称的,这取决于市场条件和供需冲击的方向。然而,不对称的实际状态因市场而异,需要对讨论进行概述。在这项研究中,我们在东京写字楼市场(世界上最大的市场之一)检验了我们关于不对称动力学的假设。我们采用了Englund等人(2008)提出的租金调整过程模型,这是误差修正模型的改进版,更现实,它捕捉了租金、空置率和库存之间的相互作用。东京写字楼市场的数据范围为2000年1月至2015年9月,涵盖10个地区。结果表明,租金和空置率波动的机制在很大程度上取决于供需变化的方向和市场条件,特别是租金的上下波动。研究还表明,需求和供给的增加不仅会促使租金趋于均衡,而且还会产生超调效应。这些结果对于正确把握未来的需求和供应冲击是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信