God and Moral Skepticism

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Milburn
{"title":"God and Moral Skepticism","authors":"J. Milburn","doi":"10.5840/QD20155112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"order to make our moral discourse and practice intelligible we must refer to making sense of, or understanding as rational. Morality will be grounded on God if we need to refer to God to make sense of our moral concepts and practices. Here I wish to look at one aspect of our moral practice that may or practice of making knowledge claims in regards to morality; that is, claimshould not do. What I wish to argue for is that it is hard, if not impossible, to make sense of this aspect of our moral practice without supposing theism. preliminary remarks, I will look at a recent skeptical argument found in KierKnowing Right from Wrong. We can call this the argument from epistemic luck, since it tries to show that if our moral beliefs are true, then it is only a 1 I will argue that the theist is in a much better position to respond to the argument from epistemic luck than his atheist counterpart.","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"43 1","pages":"118 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20155112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

order to make our moral discourse and practice intelligible we must refer to making sense of, or understanding as rational. Morality will be grounded on God if we need to refer to God to make sense of our moral concepts and practices. Here I wish to look at one aspect of our moral practice that may or practice of making knowledge claims in regards to morality; that is, claimshould not do. What I wish to argue for is that it is hard, if not impossible, to make sense of this aspect of our moral practice without supposing theism. preliminary remarks, I will look at a recent skeptical argument found in KierKnowing Right from Wrong. We can call this the argument from epistemic luck, since it tries to show that if our moral beliefs are true, then it is only a 1 I will argue that the theist is in a much better position to respond to the argument from epistemic luck than his atheist counterpart.
上帝与道德怀疑主义
为了使我们的道德话语和实践变得可理解,我们必须把理解或理解称为理性。如果我们需要参考上帝来理解我们的道德观念和实践,道德将以上帝为基础。在这里,我想看一下我们道德实践的一个方面可能是关于道德的知识主张的实践;也就是说,索赔不应该做。我想论证的是,如果不假设有神论,就很难理解我们道德实践的这一方面,如果不是不可能的话。在开始评论之前,我将看看最近在基尔的《明辨是非》中发现的一个持怀疑态度的论点。我们可以称其为来自认识运气的论证,因为它试图表明,如果我们的道德信仰是真的,那么只有1,我认为有神论者比他的无神论对手更能回应来自认识运气的论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信