An investigation of environmental, social and governance measures of listed mining sector companies in Australia

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Kumudini Heenetigala, C. D. S. Lokuwaduge, Anona Armstrong, A. Ediriweera
{"title":"An investigation of environmental, social and governance measures of listed mining sector companies in Australia","authors":"Kumudini Heenetigala, C. D. S. Lokuwaduge, Anona Armstrong, A. Ediriweera","doi":"10.15209/JBSGE.V10I4.866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to determine the extent of ESG reporting and to determine the nature and type of ESG indicators used to report ESG disclosures of listed mining sector companies in Australia. The study was conducted with secondary data collected from integrated or sustainability reports of Top 100 Companies in the Diversified Metal and Mining Sector for the year 2013. A pilot study was conducted with 12 companies which were top end of market capitalisation and compared with total of 30 companies. Findings revealed that majority of the companies had a sustainability report and the trend is towards integrated reporting and majority of the companies at the top end of market capitalisation reported on non-financial disclosures. However, the measures used for environmental and social indicators is an issue because the same indicator was measured differently by companies even in the same industry, whereas, indicators used for governance was of regulatory nature and was comparable. This study showed that there is a clear need for uniform measures to report ESG indicator.","PeriodicalId":37233,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15209/JBSGE.V10I4.866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the extent of ESG reporting and to determine the nature and type of ESG indicators used to report ESG disclosures of listed mining sector companies in Australia. The study was conducted with secondary data collected from integrated or sustainability reports of Top 100 Companies in the Diversified Metal and Mining Sector for the year 2013. A pilot study was conducted with 12 companies which were top end of market capitalisation and compared with total of 30 companies. Findings revealed that majority of the companies had a sustainability report and the trend is towards integrated reporting and majority of the companies at the top end of market capitalisation reported on non-financial disclosures. However, the measures used for environmental and social indicators is an issue because the same indicator was measured differently by companies even in the same industry, whereas, indicators used for governance was of regulatory nature and was comparable. This study showed that there is a clear need for uniform measures to report ESG indicator.
对澳大利亚矿业上市公司的环境、社会和治理措施的调查
本文的目的是确定ESG报告的范围,并确定用于报告澳大利亚上市矿业公司ESG披露的ESG指标的性质和类型。本研究采用的二手数据收集自2013年多元化金属和采矿业百强公司的综合或可持续发展报告。我们对12家市值最高的公司进行了一项试点研究,并与总共30家公司进行了比较。调查结果显示,大多数公司都有可持续发展报告,趋势是综合报告,大多数市值最高的公司都报告了非财务披露。然而,用于环境和社会指标的措施是一个问题,因为即使在同一行业,公司对同一指标的衡量方式也不同,而用于治理的指标具有监管性质,具有可比性。本研究表明,明确需要统一的ESG指标报告措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信