Audiology students’ clinical communication and information giving practices during initial consultations: The impact of a brief intervention.

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
A. Kanji, J. Watermeyer, Mishkah Ismail
{"title":"Audiology students’ clinical communication and information giving practices during initial consultations: The impact of a brief intervention.","authors":"A. Kanji, J. Watermeyer, Mishkah Ismail","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.2008175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: This exploratory study aimed to describe the impact of a brief training workshop on student audiologists’ clinical communication and information giving practices during initial consultations with adult patients. Method: This study used a two-group pretest-posttest qualitative research design, comprising three phases. Phases 1 and 3 comprised analysis of video recordings of feedback sessions during initial audiology consultations between adult patients and student audiologists, followed by video-based reflections and semi-structured interviews with students one week after the audiological consultation. Phase 2 comprised the intervention phase which took the form of a training workshop with all final year audiology students. Eight interactions were video recorded in total, four pre-intervention and four post-intervention. Our analysis incorporated an interactional sociolinguistic focus examining content and students’ communication strategies when providing information to patients. Results: Limited clinical experience and not knowing how much information to provide were common challenges reported by students. Before the intervention, students were observed to use script-like methods of providing information, with a systematic presentation of results per test. Post-intervention, students began with the audiological diagnosis and related the findings to concerns raised by patients during case history taking. Conclusions: Findings suggest that even a brief training workshop can have an immediate and tangible impact on the way students provide information to patients in audiological consultations. Teaching and learning clinical communication skills is an ongoing process. Students should also be afforded opportunities for practice accompanied by reflexive engagements in order for them to consolidate and strengthen the skills they have learned.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.2008175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This exploratory study aimed to describe the impact of a brief training workshop on student audiologists’ clinical communication and information giving practices during initial consultations with adult patients. Method: This study used a two-group pretest-posttest qualitative research design, comprising three phases. Phases 1 and 3 comprised analysis of video recordings of feedback sessions during initial audiology consultations between adult patients and student audiologists, followed by video-based reflections and semi-structured interviews with students one week after the audiological consultation. Phase 2 comprised the intervention phase which took the form of a training workshop with all final year audiology students. Eight interactions were video recorded in total, four pre-intervention and four post-intervention. Our analysis incorporated an interactional sociolinguistic focus examining content and students’ communication strategies when providing information to patients. Results: Limited clinical experience and not knowing how much information to provide were common challenges reported by students. Before the intervention, students were observed to use script-like methods of providing information, with a systematic presentation of results per test. Post-intervention, students began with the audiological diagnosis and related the findings to concerns raised by patients during case history taking. Conclusions: Findings suggest that even a brief training workshop can have an immediate and tangible impact on the way students provide information to patients in audiological consultations. Teaching and learning clinical communication skills is an ongoing process. Students should also be afforded opportunities for practice accompanied by reflexive engagements in order for them to consolidate and strengthen the skills they have learned.
听力学学生在初次会诊期间的临床交流和信息提供实践:简短干预的影响。
摘要目的:本探索性研究旨在描述一个简短的培训工作坊对学生听力学家临床沟通和信息提供实践的影响。方法:本研究采用两组前测后测定性研究设计,分为三个阶段。第一阶段和第三阶段包括分析成人患者和学生听力学家在初次听力学咨询期间反馈会话的视频记录,然后在听力学咨询一周后对学生进行基于视频的反思和半结构化访谈。第二阶段包括干预阶段,以培训研讨会的形式与所有最后一年的听力学学生。总共记录了8次互动,4次干预前和4次干预后。我们的分析结合了互动社会语言学的重点,研究内容和学生在向患者提供信息时的沟通策略。结果:临床经验有限和不知道提供多少信息是学生报告的常见挑战。在干预之前,观察学生使用类似脚本的方法提供信息,并系统地呈现每次测试的结果。干预后,学生开始进行听力学诊断,并将结果与患者在病历记录中提出的问题联系起来。结论:研究结果表明,即使是一个简短的培训研讨会也可以对学生在听力学咨询中向患者提供信息的方式产生直接和切实的影响。临床沟通技巧的传授和学习是一个持续的过程。为了巩固和加强他们所学到的技能,学生们也应该有机会进行练习,并伴有反思性的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Speech Language and Hearing
Speech Language and Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信