La inconveniencia del requisito de unanimidad para la transformación societaria: reflexión a partir del artículo 31 de la Ley 1258 de 2008

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW

Revista de Derecho Privado Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI:10.18601/01234366.N41.06

María Isabel Ortiz Cano

引用次数: 0

Abstract

El presente estudio reflexiona acerca de los alcances del artículo 31 de la Ley 1258 de 2008, por la cual se establece la unanimidad de los socios como requisito para aprobar la transformación de tipos societarios, regulados por el código de comercio, de sociedad por acciones simplificada (S.A.S.) o viceversa, y los procesos de fusión o escisión en los que resulte beneficiaria o constituida UNA S.A.S. Respecto de esta norma se advierte su inconveniencia, pues va en contravía de la libertad de elección del tipo societario, así como su innecesaridad, por existir otros mecanismos legales que impiden que los socios mayoritarios abusen de su derecho.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一致同意要求对公司转型的不便:来自2008年第1258号法律第31条的反思

本研究考虑的范围,2008年1258号法第31条,其中规定了合作伙伴一致要求批准类型转换的结果,由股份公司,贸易简化代码(S.A.S.)反之亦然,合并或分立过程中受益或组建一个S.A.S.方面这一条例的不便说,因为它违背了选择公司类型的自由，也违背了它的不必要性，因为还有其他法律机制可以防止多数合伙人滥用他们的权利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista de Derecho Privado LAW-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Revista de Derecho Privado is a semi-annual publication that compiles the results of the investigative efforts, researches and articles written by professors and jurists from national and foreign universities, that are of interest to the legal community. The journal touches on subjects of private law, with special consideration to its development within the traditional roman domain, in order to make evident the contrasts and similarities between the Latin American and European legal systems, without overlooking, of course, the required confrontation, which today is a must, with the so-called the Anglo-American law. The purpose of the journal is to encourage debates within the legal science and promote dialog among legal sources; due to its determination to address issues from a comparative law perspective, the journal has international applications also with the objective to promote debates among scholars of diverse fields. The journal, available to the scientific and academic community (teachers, researchers and students) and members of the legal practice (lawyers, judges, public servants, and legal professions in general), is addressed to all legal professionals who, either from the point of view of theory or practice, seek to deepen their knowledge of Private Law, starting from its romanist foundations and arriving to the identification of an own Latin American system which can be compared with the European system and even with the common law systems.