Multi-objective Robust Optimization and Decision-Making Using Evolutionary Algorithms

Deepanshu Yadav, Palaniappan Ramu, K. Deb
{"title":"Multi-objective Robust Optimization and Decision-Making Using Evolutionary Algorithms","authors":"Deepanshu Yadav, Palaniappan Ramu, K. Deb","doi":"10.1145/3583131.3590420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms are predominantly used for solving multi- and many-objective optimization problems to arrive at the respective Pareto front. From a practical point of view, it is desirable for a decision-maker (DM) to consider objective vectors that are less sensitive to the small perturbation in design variables and problem parameters. Such insensitive, yet closer to Pareto-optimal solutions, lie on the so-called robust front. In real-world applications, such as engineering design and process optimization problems, perturbations in variables come from manufacturing tolerances, uncertainties in material properties, variations in operating conditions, etc. The existing EMO literature on robustness studies emphasized on finding the entire robust front, but hardly considered robustness in both optimization and decision-making tasks. In this paper, we propose and evaluate different algorithmic implementations of three aspects - multi-objective optimization, robustness consideration, and multi-criterion decision-making - together. Based on experimental results on two to eight-objective problems, we discuss the outcomes and advantages of different integration approaches of these three aspects and present the most effective combined approach. The results are interesting and should pave the way to develop more efficient multi-objective robust optimization and decision-making (MORODM) procedures for handling practical problems with uncertainties.","PeriodicalId":89841,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583131.3590420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms are predominantly used for solving multi- and many-objective optimization problems to arrive at the respective Pareto front. From a practical point of view, it is desirable for a decision-maker (DM) to consider objective vectors that are less sensitive to the small perturbation in design variables and problem parameters. Such insensitive, yet closer to Pareto-optimal solutions, lie on the so-called robust front. In real-world applications, such as engineering design and process optimization problems, perturbations in variables come from manufacturing tolerances, uncertainties in material properties, variations in operating conditions, etc. The existing EMO literature on robustness studies emphasized on finding the entire robust front, but hardly considered robustness in both optimization and decision-making tasks. In this paper, we propose and evaluate different algorithmic implementations of three aspects - multi-objective optimization, robustness consideration, and multi-criterion decision-making - together. Based on experimental results on two to eight-objective problems, we discuss the outcomes and advantages of different integration approaches of these three aspects and present the most effective combined approach. The results are interesting and should pave the way to develop more efficient multi-objective robust optimization and decision-making (MORODM) procedures for handling practical problems with uncertainties.
基于进化算法的多目标鲁棒优化与决策
进化多目标优化(EMO)算法主要用于求解多目标和多目标优化问题,以达到各自的帕累托前沿。从实际的角度来看,决策者应该考虑对设计变量和问题参数的小扰动不太敏感的目标向量。这种不敏感但更接近帕累托最优解的方案,位于所谓的稳健前沿。在实际应用中,如工程设计和工艺优化问题,变量的扰动来自制造公差、材料特性的不确定性、操作条件的变化等。现有的关于鲁棒性研究的EMO文献强调寻找整个鲁棒前沿,但很少考虑优化和决策任务的鲁棒性。在本文中,我们提出并评估了多目标优化、鲁棒性考虑和多准则决策三个方面的不同算法实现。基于二目标到八目标问题的实验结果,讨论了这三个方面的不同集成方法的结果和优势,并提出了最有效的组合方法。研究结果令人感兴趣,并为开发更有效的多目标稳健优化和决策(MORODM)程序来处理具有不确定性的实际问题铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书