Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst

Hongxia Yu, Z. Dong, Wen-Dan Zhang, Shou-xi Zhang, Jia Lu, Zhenyue Qin, M-W Bao, Huihui Wang, Ying Cao, Yilin Sun, Wenjia Liu, Jiming Chen
{"title":"Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst","authors":"Hongxia Yu, Z. Dong, Wen-Dan Zhang, Shou-xi Zhang, Jia Lu, Zhenyue Qin, M-W Bao, Huihui Wang, Ying Cao, Yilin Sun, Wenjia Liu, Jiming Chen","doi":"10.11648/J.JGO.20210902.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Endometriosis is a common, chronic gynecological disease. Laparoscopy is currently the preferred method of ovarian endometriosis. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal still need to be discussed. Objective: To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for the ovarian endometrioid cystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 47 patients who had undergone LESS and LESS ovarian cystectomy due to ovarian endometrioid cyst in our hospital from March 2018 to April 2019. The patients were classified into single-port group (14) and multiport group (33) based on surgical paths. The patients’ general characteristics and perioperative outcomes compared. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in the operation time and the maximum body temperature in 24 h after operation. There were significant statistical differences (all P<0.05) in postoperative decrease of Hb, intraoperative bleeding volume, total hospital stay and CS score. Conclusion: LESS for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal is safe and feasible, and it better than CMPL in relieving postoperative pain and inproving cosmetic effects and so on.","PeriodicalId":77904,"journal":{"name":"Supplement to International journal of gynecology and obstetrics","volume":"17 Suppl 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supplement to International journal of gynecology and obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JGO.20210902.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a common, chronic gynecological disease. Laparoscopy is currently the preferred method of ovarian endometriosis. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal still need to be discussed. Objective: To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for the ovarian endometrioid cystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 47 patients who had undergone LESS and LESS ovarian cystectomy due to ovarian endometrioid cyst in our hospital from March 2018 to April 2019. The patients were classified into single-port group (14) and multiport group (33) based on surgical paths. The patients’ general characteristics and perioperative outcomes compared. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in the operation time and the maximum body temperature in 24 h after operation. There were significant statistical differences (all P<0.05) in postoperative decrease of Hb, intraoperative bleeding volume, total hospital stay and CS score. Conclusion: LESS for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal is safe and feasible, and it better than CMPL in relieving postoperative pain and inproving cosmetic effects and so on.
腹腔镜单孔与多孔手术切除卵巢子宫内膜样囊肿的临床比较
背景:子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的慢性妇科疾病。腹腔镜是目前治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位症的首选方法。然而,腹腔镜单部位手术切除卵巢子宫内膜样囊肿的安全性和可行性仍有待探讨。目的:探讨腹腔镜单腔(LESS)手术与常规多腔(CMPL)手术在卵巢子宫内膜样囊切除术中的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性分析2018年3月至2019年4月我院因卵巢子宫内膜样囊肿行LESS和LESS卵巢囊肿切除术的47例患者资料。根据手术路径分为单孔组14例和多孔组33例。比较两组患者的一般特征和围手术期结果。结果:两组患者手术时间及术后24 h最高体温比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后Hb下降、术中出血量、总住院时间、CS评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:LESS切除卵巢子宫内膜样囊肿安全可行,且在缓解术后疼痛、改善美容效果等方面优于CMPL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信