Mining for the Bomb: The Vulnerability of Buried Plutonium to Clandestine Recovery

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
C. Tracy, R. Ewing
{"title":"Mining for the Bomb: The Vulnerability of Buried Plutonium to Clandestine Recovery","authors":"C. Tracy, R. Ewing","doi":"10.1080/08929882.2022.2164407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Efforts by the United States and Russia to bilaterally reduce their weapons plutonium stockpiles are currently stalled following a U.S. decision to dilute and bury excess plutonium in a geologic repository. Russia has derided this approach as impermanent and easily reversible. Conversely, many analysts contend that the recovery of buried plutonium would require large-scale mining operations, rendering it observable and preventable. Here, we show that the use of advanced mining techniques overlooked in prior analysis (namely, salt solution mining and in situ leaching) would enable the rapid, clandestine recovery of buried plutonium. Burial would therefore yield a novel plutonium geologic resource. We attribute the persistence of international technical controversy over the permanence of plutonium burial to state-level divergence in U.S. and Russian technological framings of plutonium and geologic repositories—distinct socially constructed understandings of the meanings, uses, and risks of these technologies.","PeriodicalId":55952,"journal":{"name":"Science & Global Security","volume":"76 1","pages":"131 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Global Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2022.2164407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Efforts by the United States and Russia to bilaterally reduce their weapons plutonium stockpiles are currently stalled following a U.S. decision to dilute and bury excess plutonium in a geologic repository. Russia has derided this approach as impermanent and easily reversible. Conversely, many analysts contend that the recovery of buried plutonium would require large-scale mining operations, rendering it observable and preventable. Here, we show that the use of advanced mining techniques overlooked in prior analysis (namely, salt solution mining and in situ leaching) would enable the rapid, clandestine recovery of buried plutonium. Burial would therefore yield a novel plutonium geologic resource. We attribute the persistence of international technical controversy over the permanence of plutonium burial to state-level divergence in U.S. and Russian technological framings of plutonium and geologic repositories—distinct socially constructed understandings of the meanings, uses, and risks of these technologies.
原子弹的开采:地下钚在秘密回收中的脆弱性
美国和俄罗斯双边削减武器钚库存的努力目前陷入停滞,因为美国决定稀释多余的钚并将其埋在地质储存库中。俄罗斯嘲笑这种做法是短暂的,而且很容易逆转。相反,许多分析人士认为,回收埋藏的钚需要大规模的采矿作业,使其可见和可预防。在这里,我们表明,使用在先前的分析中被忽视的先进采矿技术(即盐溶液采矿和就地浸出)将能够快速、秘密地回收埋藏的钚。因此,埋藏将产生一种新的钚地质资源。我们将国际上关于钚埋藏持久性的技术争议的持续存在归因于美国和俄罗斯在钚和地质储存库的技术框架方面的国家层面分歧——对这些技术的意义、用途和风险的不同社会建构理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Global Security
Science & Global Security INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信