The Liberal Paradigm of Security in Sir Walter Scott's The Antiquary

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Neil Ramsey
{"title":"The Liberal Paradigm of Security in Sir Walter Scott's The Antiquary","authors":"Neil Ramsey","doi":"10.1353/pan.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If war forms the prototypical content of Sir Walter Scott’s historical fiction, his novels nonetheless repudiate war’s violence as they propel their heroes into a future of peaceful progress and development (Jameson 266). Epitomized by Scott’s first three Waverley novels, which recount the progress of Scottish manners and society in the second half of the 18th century (the novels “by the Author of Waverley”), the historical novel archetypally tracks a historical progression from military action to companionate love and a settled, domestic life (Duncan 51–105; Christensen 153–75). The hero’s path to maturity and social integration allegorizes the nation’s own historical movement away from a past dominated by civil war, fierce and bloody conflicts between Jacobites and Hanoverians or Saxons and Normans, and towards a liberal world of peace and prosperity in which conflict is resolved through the discursive institutions of the law and polite conversation. In this liberal reading, war may be central to the historical novel, but war appears as an aestheticized and archaic romance which can invigorate yet which stands outside the progress and political control of modern life. The passive hero of the historical novel is a key figure of liberalism and its peaceful negotiation of conflict, the capacious form of the novel itself mimicking the inclusiveness that defines civil society. It is the contention of this article, however, that the emergence of liberalism cannot be so easily disentangled from the violence that it disavows. Focusing on The Antiquary (1816), in which Scott concluded the first three of his Waverley novels by bringing his history of Scotland up to his own era, this article argues that the novel does not simply displace war into romance but, rather, reveals a transformation of war under liberal regimes into a new kind of militarized discourse of security, or what Jacques Rancière has described as the “pacification of the political” (1995: 20). Georg Lukács’s Marxist analysis of Scott’s fiction invites us to read war back into the historical novel: his thesis is that individuals first began to see themselves as historical participants in national life as a result of the mass mobilization and political propaganda of the French","PeriodicalId":42435,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":"25 1","pages":"65 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2022.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If war forms the prototypical content of Sir Walter Scott’s historical fiction, his novels nonetheless repudiate war’s violence as they propel their heroes into a future of peaceful progress and development (Jameson 266). Epitomized by Scott’s first three Waverley novels, which recount the progress of Scottish manners and society in the second half of the 18th century (the novels “by the Author of Waverley”), the historical novel archetypally tracks a historical progression from military action to companionate love and a settled, domestic life (Duncan 51–105; Christensen 153–75). The hero’s path to maturity and social integration allegorizes the nation’s own historical movement away from a past dominated by civil war, fierce and bloody conflicts between Jacobites and Hanoverians or Saxons and Normans, and towards a liberal world of peace and prosperity in which conflict is resolved through the discursive institutions of the law and polite conversation. In this liberal reading, war may be central to the historical novel, but war appears as an aestheticized and archaic romance which can invigorate yet which stands outside the progress and political control of modern life. The passive hero of the historical novel is a key figure of liberalism and its peaceful negotiation of conflict, the capacious form of the novel itself mimicking the inclusiveness that defines civil society. It is the contention of this article, however, that the emergence of liberalism cannot be so easily disentangled from the violence that it disavows. Focusing on The Antiquary (1816), in which Scott concluded the first three of his Waverley novels by bringing his history of Scotland up to his own era, this article argues that the novel does not simply displace war into romance but, rather, reveals a transformation of war under liberal regimes into a new kind of militarized discourse of security, or what Jacques Rancière has described as the “pacification of the political” (1995: 20). Georg Lukács’s Marxist analysis of Scott’s fiction invites us to read war back into the historical novel: his thesis is that individuals first began to see themselves as historical participants in national life as a result of the mass mobilization and political propaganda of the French
《古物》中安全的自由主义范式
如果说战争构成了沃尔特·斯科特爵士历史小说的典型内容,那么他的小说在推动英雄走向和平进步与发展的未来时,却否定了战争的暴力(詹姆森266)。斯科特的前三部威弗利小说(《威弗利的作者》)讲述了18世纪下半叶苏格兰礼仪和社会的发展,以这三部小说为代表,历史小说典型地追踪了从军事行动到伴侣之爱和安定的家庭生活的历史进程(邓肯51-105;克里斯滕森153 - 75)。主人公走向成熟和社会融合的道路寓言了这个国家自己的历史运动,从内战主导的过去,詹姆斯二世党和汉诺威人或撒克逊人和诺曼人之间激烈而血腥的冲突,走向一个和平与繁荣的自由世界,在这个世界里,冲突通过法律的话语机构和礼貌的谈话来解决。在这种自由主义的阅读中,战争可能是历史小说的中心,但战争似乎是一种审美化和古老的浪漫,它可以激发人们的活力,但又站在现代生活的进步和政治控制之外。历史小说中的被动英雄是自由主义及其和平协商冲突的关键人物,小说本身的宽大形式模仿了界定公民社会的包容性。然而,这篇文章的论点是,自由主义的出现不能轻易地与它所否认的暴力分开。在《古董》(The Antiquary, 1816)一书中,斯科特将他的苏格兰历史带入了他自己的时代,以此作为他韦弗利小说的前三部的结束语。本文认为,这部小说并没有简单地将战争取代为浪漫,而是揭示了自由主义政权下的战争转变为一种新的军事化的安全话语,或者雅克·朗西弗里特所描述的“政治的绥化”(1995:20)。乔治Lukács对斯科特小说的马克思主义分析,让我们把战争读回历史小说:他的论点是,个人第一次开始把自己看作是国家生活的历史参与者,这是法国大规模动员和政治宣传的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Partial Answers is an international, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the study of literature and the history of ideas. This interdisciplinary component is responsible for combining analysis of literary works with discussions of historical and theoretical issues. The journal publishes articles on various national literatures including Anglophone, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, Russian, and, predominately, English literature. Partial Answers would appeal to literature scholars, teachers, and students in addition to scholars in philosophy, cultural studies, and intellectual history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信