Teachers’ Evaluation and Their Professional Development in Greece

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Giorgos Maggopoulos, Konstantia Svarna
{"title":"Teachers’ Evaluation and Their Professional Development in Greece","authors":"Giorgos Maggopoulos, Konstantia Svarna","doi":"10.20849/aes.v8i2.1360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore the views of teachers regarding their evaluation and professional development. The preferred methodology is a qualitative approach which has used the semi-structured interview as a data collection technique on a sample of ten primary school teachers. The respondents considered as the main purpose of their evaluation the improvement which results from the interlinkage between the identification of weaknesses and the implementation of training interventions. As far as the evaluation criteria are concerned, they mainly highlighted the teacher's professional skills, the learning environment and the consistency of service. Persons close to the teacher, such as the director, colleagues, the teachers themselves and the Education Advisοr are considered to be the most appropriate actors. The benefits of the evaluation include the rewarding of the teachers and the recognition of their work, as well as the establishment of a culture of evaluation, while the disadvantages include negative emotions and unfair practices (e.g., stress, fear, pressure, insecurity, competition), negative consequences (e.g., salary reduction, dismissal), categorization of teachers and additional workload. Professional development is regarded as extremely useful and necessary and is achieved through formal, non-formal or informal processes. Finally, the respondents considered that the teachers’ evaluation is directly linked to their professional development, as the former feeds the latter.","PeriodicalId":44145,"journal":{"name":"Asian Education and Development Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Education and Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v8i2.1360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the views of teachers regarding their evaluation and professional development. The preferred methodology is a qualitative approach which has used the semi-structured interview as a data collection technique on a sample of ten primary school teachers. The respondents considered as the main purpose of their evaluation the improvement which results from the interlinkage between the identification of weaknesses and the implementation of training interventions. As far as the evaluation criteria are concerned, they mainly highlighted the teacher's professional skills, the learning environment and the consistency of service. Persons close to the teacher, such as the director, colleagues, the teachers themselves and the Education Advisοr are considered to be the most appropriate actors. The benefits of the evaluation include the rewarding of the teachers and the recognition of their work, as well as the establishment of a culture of evaluation, while the disadvantages include negative emotions and unfair practices (e.g., stress, fear, pressure, insecurity, competition), negative consequences (e.g., salary reduction, dismissal), categorization of teachers and additional workload. Professional development is regarded as extremely useful and necessary and is achieved through formal, non-formal or informal processes. Finally, the respondents considered that the teachers’ evaluation is directly linked to their professional development, as the former feeds the latter.
希腊教师评价与专业发展
本研究旨在探讨教师对其评鉴与专业发展的看法。首选的方法是定性方法,它使用半结构化访谈作为10名小学教师样本的数据收集技术。答复者认为,他们评价的主要目的是由于发现弱点和实施培训干预之间的相互联系而产生的改进。就评价标准而言,主要突出了教师的专业技能、学习环境和服务的一致性。与教师关系密切的人,如主任、同事、教师本人和教育顾问ο被认为是最合适的演员。评价的好处包括对教师的奖励和对他们工作的认可,以及建立一种评价文化,而缺点包括负面情绪和不公平的做法(如压力、恐惧、压力、不安全感、竞争)、负面后果(如减薪、解雇)、教师分类和额外的工作量。专业发展被认为是非常有用和必要的,并通过正式、非正式或非正式的过程来实现。最后,受访者认为教师的评价与他们的专业发展直接相关,因为前者可以促进后者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Education and Development Studies
Asian Education and Development Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Asian Education and Development Studies (AEDS) is a new journal showcasing the latest research on education, development and governance issues in Asian contexts. AEDS fosters cross-boundary research with the aim of enhancing our socio-scientific understanding of Asia. AEDS invites original empirical research, review papers and comparative analyses as well as reports and research notes around education, political science, sociology and development studies. Articles with strong comparative perspectives and regional insights will be especially welcome. In-depth examinations of the role of education in the promotion of social, economic, cultural and political development in Asia are also encouraged. AEDS is the official journal of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association. Key topics for submissions: Educational development in Asia, Globalization and regional responses from Asia, Social development and social policy in Asia, Urbanization and social change in Asia, Politics and changing governance in Asia, Critical development issues and policy implications in Asia, Demographic change and changing social structure in Asia. Key subject areas for research submissions: Education, Political Science, Sociology , Development Studies .
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信